Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: charles brown
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 140 next>>
Feb 27, 2024 03:45:18   #
Basil_O wrote:
That is why this time around, the big camera stays in the case. I just want to savor the moment. Last time was about pictures, which I got some pretty cool ones. The diamond ring is pretty awesome to see. I also got a really great shot as the clouds rolled through. But this go round, it is not about images, but the experience



πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘
Go to
Feb 26, 2024 18:10:47   #
jscorbin wrote:
When you say "remote viewing," how remote do you mean? Will you be near the camera to frequently guide it and just look at the image on a notebook computer while sitting in the shade, or stay back in the house with the camera some distance away?

Some issues:

(1) The solar filter is only good for before and after totality. For the four minutes of totality, you'll have to remove the solar filter, and may also need to refocus.

(2) If you want a decent view of the corona during totality, you'll need at least a 300mm lens for a full-frame camera, or better a 500mm or 600mm lens. With the same lens you plan to use, try taking a photo of the moon, which is about the same apparent size as the sun, to see how big the sun will appear in your photo. During totality, the corona may extend over one solar diameter or more on each side.

Alternatively, you could use a wide angle lens -- say 35mm -- to take a series of photos with the camera on the tripod, and let the sun move across the frame over the couple of hours of the whole eclipse, then make a composite to see all of the eclipse from first contact to totality through last contact. Practice this several days beforehand, just to see how to angle the camera frame along the sun's path. In two hours, the sun moves about 30Β°.

(3) For remote viewing where you are not present to guide the camera, it needs to be on a sturdy tripod and a tracking mount, to follow the sun because of Earth's rotation. The sun moves about Β½Β° (its own diameter) every two minutes. The tracker needs to be set up with its rotational axis parallel to Earth's axis (pointing near the star Polaris). Difficult to do in the daytime. You could set it up at night, cover it, and then use it in the daytime. If you get a tracking mount (several hundred $), practice a lot before the big event.

Some examples:
https://www.moveshootmove.com/collections/move-shoot-move-rotator/products/msm-rotator-for-star-tracking-time-lapse-panorama-photography?variant=21144679022669&aff=198
The Move-Shoot-Move tracker is good for shorter focal-length lenses, but inaccurate or slips for long (heavy) focal-length lenses

Better for a heavier camera/lens: https://www.skywatcherusa.com/products/star-adventurer-mini-pro-pack

(4) During totality, there is a huge variation in brightness from the little pink prominences on the sun's limb, to the inner corona, to the outer corona. You'll need several exposures at different durations to capture all parts of it. For example, a series of seven exposures from 1/500 sec. at f/11 to ΒΌ sec. at f/11, at ISO 1200 could get all the parts. You could then combine the series into a composite. To do that remotely, you'd need software that controls the camera.

If you are not planning to take photos, but just watch the eclipse on the remote computer, you'll still need some way to guide the camera and remove the solar filter during totality, and change the exposure for the live view. If there is any way you could be outside on the center line during totality, maybe with binoculars, that will give you by far the best view and experience. There are many things that go on during an eclipse, from the darkening of the sky, to stars and planets coming out, to crescent-shaped images projected on the ground through tree leaves, to strange moving shadows, to quieting of animal noises. It can be an emotional experience.

Good luck.
When you say "remote viewing," how remot... (show quote)


Thanks JBRIII for all the information. Was very helpful.
Go to
Feb 26, 2024 17:03:07   #
I have been using Photoshop Elements 2021 and no problem using the camera raw feature. Decided to upgrade to Elements 2024 and downloaded it successfully. However, when I try to use the adobe camera raw feature it won't let me. Tried to follow instructions provided on how to correct but not sure am doing it right. I think it is telling me my system is too old, but not sure. My desktop is about 7 years old with an Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G3220 @ 3.00GHz 3.00 GHz processor. Has anyone else experienced this problem? If so, what did you do to correct?
Go to
Feb 26, 2024 16:40:35   #
stu352 wrote:
I just found out today that I will be going to the path of totality for the upcoming eclipse. In case it isn't snowing or raining that day, I was thinking of getting a longer prime for my Canon EF-S APS-C body anyway, so this will be a good excuse. The longest I have now is the 55 - 255 kit lens. I think I've got the filter business figured out, but what focal lengths have worked well with APS-C machines for sun photography?


Search B&H Photo. They have everything you will need plus an explanation how to photograph eclipse.
Go to
Feb 12, 2024 14:16:14   #
Hal Masover wrote:
I'm preparing to take a 3 week international photography journey and might not take my laptop. I'm using a 45 mp camera. A reasonable estimate of how many photos I'll shoot on this trip would be something north of 2,000. My D850 uses an SD card and a CF Express B card. My decision is whether to buy a large capacity SD card, like 512, and just leave it in the camera, or several smaller cards that will be backed up by the CF Express card in case I lose any or all of them as I move through several countries? Are the large SD cards stable? Do these read as fast as smaller cards?
I'm preparing to take a 3 week international photo... (show quote)


I use a new card every day when travelling. Low-capacity SD cards are cheap and are reuseable.
Go to
Dec 27, 2023 13:03:07   #
jcboy3 wrote:
iPhone 15 Pro


Go to
Dec 27, 2023 12:56:04   #
Fencehog wrote:
I have the following Nikon F mount lenses for my Nikon D500:
Nikon 18-300 mm (used handheld when my grandchildren are performing, depends on my distance from the stage).
Tamron 18-400 mm (used handheld when my grand children are performing, depends on my distance from the stage, 100 mm can make a difference).
Tamron 160-600 mm (used on a tripod to photograph birds and squirrels in my backyard or on my neighbor's roof).
(these three lenses are sometimes attached to 1.4X or 2X teleconverters).
Nikon 105 mm macro (use it less after retiring than before).
Pre-digital time Nikon 60 mm macro (not used frequently now).
Has anyone used some or all of these lenses with a Nikon Z8?
If yes, what has your experience been? Do you have any suggestions, recommendations?
I have yet to buy a Nikon Z8, but am thinking about it. Chances of buying one will be better if I will not have to purchase new lenses, skylight filters, etc.
In case it will make any difference: I am nearing 92 and in a wheel chair, but in reasonably good shape for my age. Still know well what keys are for, but sometimes forget where I put them.
I have the following Nikon F mount lenses for my N... (show quote)


Had a friend who said to keep it simple. Going from a DX camera to a FF, think new lenses. Otherwise, why bother. Going from a FF to a DX, think adapter.
Go to
Dec 26, 2023 13:43:28   #
PHRubin wrote:
You don't need a filter during the total phase. 200mm is rather short for this purpose. I used a bridge camera during the 2017 eclipse set at full tele, ~1200 mm (35 equiv) and still cropped the image.



I used a Nikon bridge camera set at just under 1200 mm for the first photo. I had to drastically crop the image in order to get the attached results. If I remember correctly, I had the filter on when it was taken. The same is true for the other two photos.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Dec 19, 2023 14:36:05   #
kjfishman wrote:
What DSLR do you shoot with?

A. Nikon
B. Canon
C. Pentax
D. Other please specify


Had a Nikon DX D7500 and four lenses. Traded all my Nikon camera's, lenses, etc. for a Canon FF mirrorless system. Not sure I did the right thing.
Go to
Dec 14, 2023 16:56:50   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Photoshop Elements has a 30-day free trial:
https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-elements/free-trial.html

Of particular interest may be the three separate layouts and sets of tools:
Quick, Guided, Advanced


Go to
Dec 12, 2023 17:34:48   #
AzPicLady wrote:
I have a farm in the middle of Illinois. I had planned to go there for the eclipse. I recently downloaded a map of the course of the eclipse and found out that I'm about 15 miles outside the "total darkness" range. How much difference will that make?

For those of you who know the area, Effingham is right on the north edge of the path, and I'm 15 miles north of Effingham.


B&H has lots of different size filters that are in the $15-30 range. Usually includes lens filter plus glasses.
Go to
Dec 5, 2023 15:03:11   #
Ugly Hedgehog Newsletter wrote:
Hi all, I am retired but have always been an amateur photographer. Took a lot of pictures for my own enjoyment . Now that I am retired, I plan to go back to my country and become a photographer for weddings which is a good business.

Could someone tell me what kind of camera, lenses, flash and battery charger I should buy to do weddings? Iam not talking high end equipment but good enough to take good and sharp pics.Right now I only have point and shoot cameras with no interchangeable lenses.

Any help will be appreciated.

Vijay
Hi all, I am retired but have always been an amate... (show quote)


I've noticed that everyone is recommending a DSLR or mirrorless camera system. I recommend that you talk to some professional wedding photographers and do a lot of research before making a final decision as to what system you will be using. No one has suggested a medium format camera system which is what I have often seen as the equipment used by many professionals.
Go to
Dec 5, 2023 14:50:49   #
Harry13 wrote:
>That's out of about 9 cameras I still have.

My desk in my home ffice has a BIG drawer. It's full of cameras, Canon and Nikon, dunno how many. And maybe an old Voightlander (I bought one through the PX in Korea many years ago.) I've given away a few cameras, never sold one. Just consign them to that drawer. :-) I have one Canon that I use once in a while. Harry


Thinks that's bad, just talk to an old fisherman. Ask him how many rods and reels he has bought over the years that he still has.
Go to
Dec 5, 2023 14:43:15   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
He was saying this post should be in the photo gallery instead of main photography


Go to
Dec 5, 2023 14:41:13   #
User ID wrote:
So its gifting season, and some of us will also generously gift ourself as well. In many such cases the arrival of a new whizbang machine should spell adios for some seldom used relic that we havent yet kicked to the curb ... "out of kindness I suppose".

Fess up ! Whats your still functional but quite neglected old relic that has just hung around thru benign neglect or chronic procrastination.

I can fess up to six SLRs and a Pocket Zoom, some of them never having seen regular use at all and retired before their first birthday :-(

Okaaay Hawgz ! Step right up and Fess Up ! Itz good for the soul and good for the biome. Time to cleanse your soul and spill your gutz.
So its gifting season, and some of us will also ge... (show quote)


I had an old box camera that my dad used in the 1930s and 40s to take photographs. I last used it in the 70s and it still worked. Neither of my sons were interested in photography so I gave it to my nephew who teaches and runs a media center for a school system. I have had several digital cameras over the years and usually trade them in when I get GAS for a new camera. I know, I lose money, but very convenient.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 140 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.