Posts for: mborn
Apr 1, 2013 08:05:40 #
romanticf16 wrote:
Much of PS6 is devoted to design and 4 color printing. Lightroom is strictly photography and image retrieval. It enables you to store a thumbnail of your images on your main drive, linking to your originals stored on specified internal or external drives. Manipulations are non destructive actions until exported, at which time they are executed on a COPY of your original file. The both can interchange files for manipulation and storage as needed.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Mar 31, 2013 07:36:58 #
Get filters that fit the biggest lens size and use step up or step down rings to connect to the smaller lens. much cheaper than buying filters for each lens
Mar 31, 2013 07:34:29 #
tainkc wrote:
Can anyone say, "content aware move"? T... (show quote)
Ditto, Double Ditto :thumbup: CS 6 leaves CS5 in the dust
Mar 30, 2013 08:13:05 #
take a FX lens and place it on a FX camera , aim at a scene and look though the viewfinder and note how the scene looks now take the same lens and place it on a DX camera and compare. If you have say a D800 you can cycle through the crop factors and see how the angle of view changes and how the subject seems bigger
Mar 29, 2013 11:26:22 #
nat wrote:
Thank you, Michael. I have a loupe for the LCD screen, but even with that, I often find a discrepancy when I download to the computer.
Remember you are looking at a jpeg on the lCD sceen of the camera and you can change the brightness of the viewing screen. Best help is the histogram
Mar 29, 2013 10:57:20 #
billybaseball wrote:
So, basically what you are saying here is that Nikon is better.
No He is not saying that, First I use Nikon. But Canon has different lens mounts depending on the Camera series, All Nikon lens fit all models of Nikon DX lens will fit on FX bodies and FX lens will fit on DX bodies All are compatible
Mar 29, 2013 09:37:02 #
nat wrote:
I was able to get to your website. I'm particularl... (show quote)
Nat
Private message me your e-mail address so we can correspond better
Myer
Mar 29, 2013 09:12:14 #
nat wrote:
I have PS, but I have been reluctant to spend much time learning it, as it seems so intimidating. FYI - You have an impressive bio and I tried to check out your website but it wasn't available.
That is interesting, I clicked on the link and it connected me. You can also use NIK in LR and LR is less intimidating than PS. Me personally I shoot in RAW, I find for me it gives me more options.
Possibly we could get together and do some shooting and I could show you PP in LR and PS
Mar 29, 2013 08:44:42 #
nat wrote:
Thanks, mborn. Hmm. You really brought out details and now I'm thinking, the original is more appealing (if it ever was in the first place, but I liked it)..he/she is not quite so handsome with every detail showing. That is also true of our species...right? Thanks again.
Nat
You are welcome the advantage to working in PS and with NIK is you can adjust the picture to what you want. You can show more ore less details. just did a 3 minute adjustment to answer the original question.
BTW I am in SE Mass
Mar 29, 2013 07:05:34 #
All that is needed is some PP in PS with NIK Color Efex Pro 2 Detail extractor and tonal contrast
Mar 29, 2013 06:54:00 #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Please don't take this wrong, but why it this impo... (show quote)
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Mar 28, 2013 08:34:27 #
DwsPV wrote:
Hi mborn
Looks really good n sharp! How far away were you roughly? But now the 500 becomes 1000 right, and I am try to get to 400 with my 70/200....
Cheers
Looks really good n sharp! How far away were you roughly? But now the 500 becomes 1000 right, and I am try to get to 400 with my 70/200....
Cheers
around 50 ft I just posted it since I could not find one that I took with 70-200 & the 2x
Mar 28, 2013 06:44:06 #
If you buy the Nikon 2x TC make sure you get Model III http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/Camera-Lenses/2189/AF-S-Teleconverter-TC-20E-III.html
I took this photo with the TC on a 500 mm f/4 with the TC
I took this photo with the TC on a 500 mm f/4 with the TC
Mar 28, 2013 06:33:17 #
DxO just rated the 5200 as better sharpness than the 7100 Might look at that camera rather than the 3200
Mar 26, 2013 05:49:09 #
Tea8 wrote:
Well the newest Canon like that is the SX50 I believe. Why not give it a look over or even the SX40 if the 50 is out of your price range. Or are you wanting to go more into the DSLR line? I'm a Nikon shooter so I can't really help you with Canon, but a little more info on whether or not you want to stay in the bridge camera line would be helpful for those who give you info on Canon.
Lillian Stokes, a great bird photographer has been taking a lot of photos recently with the SX50 and gives it great marks