Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jmdenver
Page: <<prev 1 ... 30 31 32 33
Jul 13, 2012 14:45:12   #
Paul B. wrote:
Very good B&W picture,job well done.


Thank you, Paul B.
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 14:29:27   #
gessman wrote:
jmdenver wrote:
Lately, I've been re-exploring my interest in B/W photography. Certain scenes just lend themselves to B/W better than color. Digital sure beats hours in a darkroom. This is an old truck outside of Silverton, CO. Anyone know what it was?


Looks like a 1937 International pickup.


Gessman, I think you maybe correct. There are definitely some similarities. What was it about the design that allowed you to make an educated guess on the make and year. I didn't even know where to begin looking?
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 09:02:18   #
RowdyBlue wrote:
Very nice. I'd like to see it in color, too.


I wish I could show you a color version, but I only shot it in B/W. I have since learned from my foolish mistake.
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 09:00:12   #
rpavich wrote:
Nice shot...nice choice of lens...nicely done.


Thanks for your input.
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 08:59:05   #
Blueduck wrote:
Tops on the wow meter. Nicely done.


Thank you for your thoughts.
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 08:57:40   #
sands wrote:
jmdenver wrote:
Lately, I've been re-exploring my interest in B/W photography. Certain scenes just lend themselves to B/W better than color. Digital sure beats hours in a darkroom. This is an old truck outside of Silverton, CO. Anyone know what it was?


Not sure what kind of truck it is, but an extraordinarily good B&W photo. Can't imagine seeing it any other way.


Sands, I appreciate your thoughts. Thanks for looking.
Go to
Jul 12, 2012 14:20:13   #
CORNISH wrote:
Nice b/w shot, like it


It seems my English friends are all checking in. Thanks
Go to
Jul 12, 2012 14:19:03   #
What I love about this site is you get to meet people from all over the world. Cheers from across the pond. Thanks for looking.
Go to
Jul 12, 2012 14:11:25   #
Lately, I've been re-exploring my interest in B/W photography. Certain scenes just lend themselves to B/W better than color. Digital sure beats hours in a darkroom. This is an old truck outside of Silverton, CO. Anyone know what it was?

A fixer upper

Go to
Jul 12, 2012 14:01:33   #
The Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad is a narrow gauge railroad running between Chama, New Mexico and Antonito, Colorado. It runs over Cumbres Pass at an elevation of 10,015 ft. One of the benefits of this train is that it runs adjacent to a highway for a number of miles. After it stops for a time at the top of the pass, allowing you to take pictures there if you so desire. You can then get in to your car get ahead of it several more times giving you plenty of time to prepare to photograph it again and again. C&C welcome.

Toltec Cumbres Narrow Gauge RR

Go to
Jul 12, 2012 01:54:55   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
The best way to see true macro is to:
1.) turn-off Auto-Focus;
2.) adjust lens to closest focus, know as Minimum Focusing Distance (MFD);
3.) select photo mode (Aperture priority, Shutter priority, Manual);
4.) move entire camera/lens combo in-&-out toward subject, taking photo when image is in focus via eyepiece;
5.) note Working Distance (between lens front element & subject).
For a 90-mm lens on a Nikon body, WD is 135-mm = 5.3-inches. Any farther away is a close-up. MFD results in minimal DoF. I tend to shoot a bit farther back (better DoF), then crop to macro proportions. 10-inches will not capture a true macro image, but is crop-able; 24-inches is definitely too far away for macro.
The best way to see true macro is to: br 1.) turn-... (show quote)
That makes complete sense. Thank you for taking the time to explain the difference. What would be the benefit, if any, if I were to use a set of extension tubes with this 90mm lens? Would it enable me to work at an even closer MFD?
Go to
Jul 11, 2012 22:27:11   #
Thanks, Tinusbum, I appreciate your input.
Go to
Jul 11, 2012 22:24:52   #
Nikonian72, please excuse my ignorance. I still am not sure how a close-up and a macro differ. I know a macro is at least 1:1 but how can you tell if what you are shooting meets that requirement? I see you cropped my photos much tighter and they maintained the same quality of resolution that they had previously. I used a Tamron 90mm with a D7000 and was approximately 10 inches from the bee and maybe 24 inches from the butterfly. In other posts, I have read that simply cropping a close-up does not make it a macro yet you seemed to imply by cropping my photos that they are now macros. I am missing something. Would you be so kind as to enlighten me? Many thanks in advance.
Go to
Jul 11, 2012 22:16:33   #
Bret, thanks for looking. I have been watching this site for quite some time now and admire your work.
Go to
Jul 11, 2012 15:44:25   #
Just some local flora and fauna.






Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 30 31 32 33
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.