Okay, you asked for it. Here are some sources with evidence for the accusations of the Obama Administration faking data.

1. F**e unemployment reports to get him re-elected in 2013- http://nypost.com/2013/11/18/census-f**ed-2012-e******n-jobs-report/

2. B******i story. I don't feel compelled to offer any sources since this story has been debunked so thoroughly already.

3. Eric Holder and others lying to Congress - http://reason.com/blog/2012/06/15/definitive-proof-that-eric-holder-lied-t

4. Obama falsifying CIA reports on ISIS - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/intelligence-agents-obama-falsified-reports-regarding-jim-kouri

5. VA officials falsified data - http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/04/07/va-wait-time-manipulation-veterans/82726634/

6. Obama falsely claimed Iran was in Nuclear compliance - I had a hard time locating quote, but found this to be even worse - http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/264044/obama-f**ed-iran-nuclear-compliance-secret-daniel-greenfield

7. "You can keep you Doctor." - No need to verify - Everybody knows about this.

As I said before, you live in a bubble and I wouldn't be surprised if you weren't even aware of half this stuff. For that, I would not impugn you. But I have a high level of confidence that once you are aware, you will pretend this stuff never happened.

I plead guilty to putting words in your mouth. Do you think that there are any f**e news stories coming from liberal sources?

Your description sounds pretty accurate to me! Keenan seriously believes that there are absolutely no "f**e news" stories coming from liberal sources. Some people live in a bubble.

You said it! I usually don't respond to that guy, but once in awhile I just can't help myself.

Are you implying that we are no longer allowed to talk about Obama three days after he left office? If I recall, the Liberals on this site, including you, have been talking about George Bush for eight years.

How about the lowest Labor Participation rate in 40 years, or the slowest Gross Domestic Product growth under any previous President.

20% of Republicans did not v**e for Trump. The gap was filled in by millions of Democrats who switched over to v**e for him.

This story is almost laughable in light of Obama's record in the last eight years. Perhaps they are right about the White House Spokesman's false quotes about the crowd size, a subject of little importance. Here are some much more serious instances of Government "making up stories" on important issues during the last eight years:

1. Government falsified employment numbers in California in order for official unemployment record to be under 5% for Obama's re-e******n in 2012.

2. Obama himself made up story about B******i demonstrations for the same purpose as above.

2. Attorney General Eric Holder and several others, including Hillary, were caught lying to Congress on numerous occasions.

3. Obama falsified reports about ISIS coming from the CIA as evidenced by the open letter from 50 CIA analysts saying so.

4. Veterans Administration officials falsified reports on patients living and dead in order to inflate their perceived progress and collect big bonuses.

5. Obama claimed that "inspectors have determined Iran to be in full compliance with U.N. agreements on Nuclear Material," prompting a farsical back and forth with reporters by the White House Spokesman at a press conference.

6. If you like your Healthcare plan (or Doctor), you can keep it.

Not one person was disciplined or fired for the above fabrications, and these are just the first ones that come to mind. Obama himself just recently said that he was proud of the fact that he hasn't had a single scandal in the White House during his term!!??

Like the Chinese proverb, We are living in interesting times!

LOL

Perhaps you are right about George Bush's gradual decline in favorability ratings, but my point is still the same. He could not sink below 50% approval rating unless a portion of Republicans began disapproving of him along with the Democrats.

I think your chart shows an interesting phenomenon. I've seen this on many surveys especially about crime and the economy. Because of the flood of negative news coverage we get, people will often answer questions about how everybody else is doing in the Country with "crime is rampant, the economy sucks," and so on. When questioned about their own lives, the respondent will answer "I'm doing just great!"

I think I know the answer to this, something I have been noticing over the last two decades or so. Democrats are much more likely to give high marks to elected officials of their Party than are Republicans. I h**e to say it, but Democrats are far less likely to be informed about policy issues and to know what is going on in government than are Republicans. Therefore, they tend to give an automatic pass to elected Democrats, no matter what their performance in office. Republicans are much tougher on their own Party's elected officials.

Democrat Example: Ted Kennedy drives off bridge and k**ls woman. Runs away and hides for 18 hours before family members convince him to notify police. Gets re-elected to Senate for life.
Democrat Example: Mayor Marion Barry of Washington D.C. gets caught snorting cocaine with a hooker and gets re-elected to office by landslide.
Democrat Example: Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick of Detroit is convicted on felony corruption charges and sentenced to 28 years in the Pokey. Instead of being ostracised by the Detroit community, he is thrown a huge going away party by thousands of Detroiters and supporters. Even now there is a huge petition drive by supporters to get Obama to give him a pardon. Would probably have been re-elected if not residing in Federal Prison.

Republican Example: Richard Nixon covers up Watergate burglary and is pilloried by both Political Parties and forced to resign. Obama has 12 - 18 major scandals and not a hint of disapproval by Democrat Lawmakers.
Republican Example: George H. W. Bush says "Read my Lips, no new taxes," breaks this one promise, and is bounced from office.
Republican Example: George W. Bush, after near-record high approval ratings, in last year in office revs up Federal Debt, bails out Banks and GM. Republican disapproval contributes to giving him near-record low approval numbers.

There is an approval rating threshold of about 40% that a Democratic President cannot fall below because 80% of their Party just refuse to admit anything is wrong.
If you look at approval ratings for all P**********l Candidates going back to 1956, Hillary has the lowest favorability rating for Democrats, but it is still 51%!

Also, the Rush Limbaugh Theorem, "Obama is seen not as leading or governing the country, but as fighting against all the injustices of the establishment," plays a big part of it. Many Democrats may think that the Country is going all to Hell, but it has nothing to do with Obama. It is all seen as Bush's fault, even eight years later!

I don't think that the Paris Accord is really going to cost anybody much money. This is because it was only an agreement in principle to cut back on greenhouse gas emissions, with no actual directives on how to do so. That is why NASA's most famous G****l W*****g advocate, James Hansen, called the Paris Accord a big farce, with a lot of feel-good talk about C*****e C****e.

The same thing happened at the Kyoto Conference many years ago. There actually were directives given to the countries that signed on with Kyoto, but not a single country met it's greenhouse emissions goals. By contrast the United States, who did not sign on with Kyoto, actually reduced its greenhouse gasses by something like 15 %. The Kyoto signers did not have any reduction at all in their emissions.

If they were really serious about reducing greenhouse gasses, they would have Skyped or conference-called the Paris Accord instead of spewing tons of airplane fuel into our atmosphere.