Posts for: EvKar
Sep 28, 2020 18:24:01 #
rmcgarry331 wrote:
On your Nikon DX 7100, you probably be better off with the AFS DX Nikkor 16-80mm f2.8-4. It is extremely sharp, light weight, and less expensive than the 24-70. It was designed to cover the same range as a 24-120 on an FX camera, on a DX camera.
Thanks... the 16-80mm might be the ticket, but I think I prefer the f2.8 throughout the range. Which comes at a cost from the wallet and with the additional weight and size. I'll keep thinking about it, tho.
Sep 28, 2020 17:52:36 #
Fotoartist wrote:
The Nikon 24-70 has long been known to be one of the sharpest Nikon lenses ever if that is of utmost importance to you.
That is what I have always understood. I do think sharpness is important to me. I do all I can to gain that sharpness by being solid in my stance, having the proper shutter speed, and using a tripod when needed.
Thank you for your input...EvKar
Sep 28, 2020 17:48:21 #
rmalarz wrote:
In fact, weight will contribute to sharper photographs in a positive manner. But then, I'm inclined to ignore weight in favor of quality.
--Bob
In fact, weight will contribute to sharper photographs in a positive manner. But then, I'm inclined to ignore weight in favor of quality.
--Bob
Thanks for your input... I was just surprised at the weight compared to my prime lenses... but then I have not utilized a quality zoom before.
EvKar
Sep 28, 2020 17:45:17 #
PixelStan77 wrote:
I would keep the Nikon 24-70 and use a monopod to assist you for even sharper images.
Thank you for your reply...
Sep 28, 2020 12:43:11 #
I have been wanting the versatility of a zoom lens for a long time, but my experience with such lenses in the past is you sacrifice a little on the picture quality in the way of sharpness for the convenience of having a wide range of focal lengths. The bigger range, you achieve less sharpness. But should you pay for the higher end lens, the above should not be an issue.
I love my prime lenses, 50mm and 35mm for the sharpness, but with my Tamron 18-270, I cannot achieve the sharpness I desire; but then again, I didn’t pay much for it compared to the high end lenses that have the better glass and same focal length. I just could not justify the expenditure for just a hobby.
Well, I keep finding my self in volunteer picture taking events… events that have large gathering and small, where I desire consistent sharpness and in a focal range of my primes. As I don’t trust the 18-270 to achieve the results (except outdoors, then even that is touch and go), I’ll swap out my primes throughout the event. In the process of swapping, I’m missing shots and I’m a nervous wreck… you guys have been there!
Well, all the above to say that I finally broke down and purchased for my Nikon D7100, a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR at a hefty cost of $1,899. I was excited about this lens, even the cost didn’t dampen my enthusiasm (I got over my GAS attack), but the size and weight have made me question my decision. So, my question to the UH group… is this something that I have to live with; should you want quality/sharpness in a zoom, you’ll have to understand it will be a bigger lens due the amount of glass needed to achieve this quality?
Comparing the Nikon to the Tamron and the Sigma versions at the local camera shop (where I just bought the Nikon 24-70, and the D7100 several years back), I felt that I wasn’t seeing the sharpness that the Nikon generated… but then again, they were lighter and less costly lenses. And the various reviews that I read said the same thing, the Nikon achieves better sharpness. But at 2 and half pounds (3/4 pound, 9 oz heavier than the Tamron), is it worth it? I have 30 days to return should I desire… am I just having “Buyer’s Remorse”, or is this to be expected should you want to up your game?
I love my prime lenses, 50mm and 35mm for the sharpness, but with my Tamron 18-270, I cannot achieve the sharpness I desire; but then again, I didn’t pay much for it compared to the high end lenses that have the better glass and same focal length. I just could not justify the expenditure for just a hobby.
Well, I keep finding my self in volunteer picture taking events… events that have large gathering and small, where I desire consistent sharpness and in a focal range of my primes. As I don’t trust the 18-270 to achieve the results (except outdoors, then even that is touch and go), I’ll swap out my primes throughout the event. In the process of swapping, I’m missing shots and I’m a nervous wreck… you guys have been there!
Well, all the above to say that I finally broke down and purchased for my Nikon D7100, a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR at a hefty cost of $1,899. I was excited about this lens, even the cost didn’t dampen my enthusiasm (I got over my GAS attack), but the size and weight have made me question my decision. So, my question to the UH group… is this something that I have to live with; should you want quality/sharpness in a zoom, you’ll have to understand it will be a bigger lens due the amount of glass needed to achieve this quality?
Comparing the Nikon to the Tamron and the Sigma versions at the local camera shop (where I just bought the Nikon 24-70, and the D7100 several years back), I felt that I wasn’t seeing the sharpness that the Nikon generated… but then again, they were lighter and less costly lenses. And the various reviews that I read said the same thing, the Nikon achieves better sharpness. But at 2 and half pounds (3/4 pound, 9 oz heavier than the Tamron), is it worth it? I have 30 days to return should I desire… am I just having “Buyer’s Remorse”, or is this to be expected should you want to up your game?
Sep 15, 2020 18:08:24 #
Looks like Trouble.. I would keep a Squeeze/Hug on him!
Aug 29, 2019 19:52:09 #
Jul 29, 2019 23:32:16 #
Ouch! Thanks for sharing your personal pictures, stuff that we don't see every day. Again, thanks for serving! Does your TBI limit you today? I'm sure it must, but can I ask in what way? Just tell me if I'm getting too personal and to leave it alone. :)
Jul 29, 2019 23:23:12 #
I guess this is not someone that you'd want to help cross the road. Crazy and scary! I have a feeling that I'd wouldn't last doing your job, as I have to figure things out the hard way. Thanks for serving our country.
Jul 29, 2019 23:13:51 #
Great shots and excellent use of DOF. The brilliant colors were really enhanced by your focal points sharpness and the darker background. Excellent. Always fun to shoot photos of colorful subject. And I thought Kodachrome was what brought out the color! :)
May 1, 2019 12:59:49 #
Excellent Shot... I'm so jealous of your abilities as a photographer. And I'm so jealous of the Osprey, as well... I'm throwing away my fly rod! 
Apr 24, 2019 13:24:21 #
Wow, that is a swallow that should be proud of his foliage... and you should be proud of that photo. Excellently done!
Jan 22, 2019 22:33:06 #
Great Job GrandPa... pictures that will last a lifetime and more. Who knows, you'll probably be taking pictures of them surfing before we know it... be sure to share.
Jan 21, 2019 20:08:36 #
Wow, Great set.. all are winners. I love the richness of the colors. The spray of the breaking waves catching the Golden Hour is awesome. Thanks for sharing. 
Jan 18, 2019 23:13:50 #
Great Pictures... Great Timing! But I just got to know... the mystery is... when a tree falls and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? Did this tree know you were across the street, thus was forced to make a sound as it broke? Still a mystery! 