NJFrank wrote:
Playing around in Photoshop I created this image. I also have to give some credit to Mother Nature she is the one who made the flowers. Since the flowers is basically white I thought I would go with a B/W of sorts. FYC
I really like it.
If your not that familiar with PS and want to darken that one petal, use the "quick selection tool" to select that petal and use "brightness/contrast" to bring it down a touch. It looks much more natural than using the burn tool.
Gilbert
Nicely Done, especially #2.
I like the beached boats. This may not be the best composition for them, but there is great potential there.
Gilbert
NJFrank wrote:
Always a good thing to experiment. That being said #1 for me is a keeper. A very serene dreamy feel to this shot. The #2. colors reminds me of the 1960's post cards that a beach goer could purchase of the Jersey shore
And for that reason I am drawn to #2. With a little work like Linda did it could be a "retro" homage to those days. There is something delightful about some of the old staged, over-everythinged postcards from the 50's that can be reimagined with todays equipment.
Gilbert
Follow up: UPS emailed me back and requested my tracking number, which I sent them.
They responded with a thank you, we'll investigate.
Gilbert
rjaywallace wrote:
Having experienced a similar UPS non-delivery “delivery” first hand, the experience above related by UHH member “JGW30033” does not surprise me. My situation involved a high-end radio shipped from CCrane in California to an address in Illinois. It took me quite a while to persuade the vendor and UPS that I had not received the radio. In the end, I demanded a full refund and it took another 30 days for that to be issued. Caveat emptor.
Wow! That's a name from the past. I didn't know C Crane was still in business. Are they still as good as they used to be, i.e. the best?
To answer the question, I did call but after trying to get through their phone tree and all the prompts none of which pertained to the situation at hand, repeatedly hitting "O" for operator and being put back to the beginning of the tree-I gave up. I sent an email through the website, so lets see if I get a response.
Gilbert
I know we all use UPS and Fed-Ex a lot and wanted to pass on my experience
I had a package coming from Nikon USA via UPS. It was not marked signature required. I have "My Choice" so I tracked the truck all day as it drove past the entrance to my community at least 8 times. About 3:30 I got the "Getting Close" notification, so I went to the living room next to the front door. At 4:00 pm, I got pinged that the package had been delivered, but no picture attached. A moment later I heard the truck drive by without slowing down. I opened the door and there was nothing. Luckily I live in a townhome community with one way in and one way out. I walked to the outbound side and waited. I heard the truck stop and start a few times and stood in the road so he would have to stop when he got to me. I asked him about the package for my address. He just looked at me and reached across to the passenger side under the dashboard and pulled out my box. I asked him why he tagged it delivered when it wasn't. He said he could not find my unit number (all the houses have numbers prominently above the front doors). I asked him why he couldn't find mine when I heard at least 4 stops that he seemed to have found. He just hit the gas and left. My thought is he saw Nikon and figured he could get some free stuff, not knowing I was the rare person that was home and waiting.
Maybe not all porch thieves are out looking for opportunity, sometimes they might drive the truck.
Gilbert
ImageCreator wrote:
I'll try that next time and bring a ladder.
I have actually adapted a painters extension pole with a quick release on the top. Light fiberglass, fits in the trunk and extends to 15 feet. I don't use it with my DSLR, but works great with my Canon G16.
Gilbert
Bob, I'm not quite sure what I think. Technically great, but I delayed answering because I didn't know what to say. 15 minutes and a bunch of posts later, I am still thinking about it-but isn't that the point of a great photo?
Gilbert
My vote is for color. But that being said, it would be nice to get the camera about 5 feet higher so the farmland leads to the mountains and doesn't cut the base off. But great pano none the less.
Gilbert
JackW wrote:
Peachtree Camera in Marietta, Georgia (770)795-8020 has been servicing my gear for twenty years - Alan is certified by all of the camera manufacturers and actually does the service work for a lot of local camera houses (including KEH I think).
They are a family owned and operated business with three generations working in the shop. All of my pro photographer friends use Peachtree Camera plus a lot of the local newspapers.
Plus 1 for Peachtree Camera. AND they are honest.
Gilbert
Here is my $.02.
I adjusted the WB to the front bird, then cooled it off a touch when it came out way too golden, toned down the highlights and opened the shadows to bring out the water in the background. Then cropped. Everything was done in Camera Raw.
Thank you for the opportunity
Gilbert
fergmark wrote:
I like the biplane shot a lot. They are really good subjects. I visit a small country airfield when I get over to Bucks County PA where they have many, most of which are parked up in several unlit hangars. I was guessing you had been shooting in one, and so had the ISO up for that reason.
No-Like I said it's my first real shoot with the new body and I went a little to far to avoid any camera shake.
Thanks for your advice.
Gilbert
magnetoman wrote:
Youâve chosen intriguing angles in both shots Gilbert, which adds bucket loads of interest. I get your HDR look but itâs no longer my favourite - purely a personal thing. Nicely done though.
I remember seeing Tracy Curtis-Taylor land her Stearman at Yeovilton two or three years back - both very lovely! She since had an accident with it in the desert but, given her character, I suspect itâs up and running again.
I agree with the overcooked HDR, generally not my style, but these almost needed it to get the cockpit and engine details. But after seeing them on the site, I realized I pushed it to far and went back and adjusted them back. Sometimes I enraptured with the tweaking and forget the purpose of the image.
I also got to see Fifi, one of only two B-29's still flying.
Thank you
Gilbert