Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: skornfeld
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17 next>>
Dec 27, 2019 11:28:13   #
imagemeister wrote:
My experienced $.02 ......Yes, Gitzo is mostly name recognition IMHO . Never owned one , but have seen and handled them. IMO, your selections are mostly overkill for what you have - but I do understand that most people with Nikon 850's ARE into name recognition/impressionism. Any of the ones you mention should do you well and I LIKE having a centerpost - just in case you need to high - and quickly.
.


Thanks for the but not sure what you meant 850 people being into name recognition? I worked my way up to it as my skills and usage increased. I moved from a 7200 to a 810 to the 850 and upgraded my lenses along the way. If I was just into name recognition I wouldn’t have asked question.

Maybe I just read more into your comment than was intended, if so then I retract the above.
Go to
Dec 27, 2019 08:41:42   #
tradio wrote:
I have only experience with the Gitzo and I am very pleased. A tripod is an item that you don't want to skip on so check them all out thoroughly and another thing to consider, although I never have had to do it, is the ease of getting parts should that problem ever arise.
* I have the BH 50 and I'm sure you will love the BH-40. I've never looked back.


Thanks
Go to
Dec 27, 2019 08:30:49   #
It's time to move on from Manfrotto be free tripod, too shaky and the head has become a pain. I've decided on a RRS BH-40, please no advise on that as I've done my research and handled my friend's.

My problem is with the legs. I've kind of narrowed it down to either a Gitzo traveler for $600; a benro series 3 Mach 3 for $330 or a Indira Series 2 Stealth for $400. RRS legs are out of my price range. I shoot mainly landscape and travel along with grandchildren sports. I understand none of these combinations will fit in carry-on and I am willing to put it in my checked luggage. I shoot with a nikon 850 and my heaviest lens is a 70-200 f2.8. I'm going to B&H Monday to see in person, but wanted to see if anyone in this group has first hand experience with any of these legs and/or if you think the Gitzo is worth the extra money or is it just brand recognition?
Go to
Sep 30, 2019 20:34:56   #
Thanks to everyone!!!
Go to
Sep 30, 2019 15:36:00   #
PierreD wrote:
I've lived in Phoenix for 20+ years.... The opportunities for photography are limitless. What are you primarily interested in? Nature & wildlife, cities, monuments, native art, etc... Without a bit more info. it's just about impossible to provide meaningful recommendations.


mostly landscape, not a birder or wildlife. Cities at night light up, sunrises and sunsets
Go to
Sep 30, 2019 10:12:07   #
Thanks to all of you
Go to
Sep 29, 2019 12:54:18   #
thanks to everyone who replied so far
Go to
Sep 29, 2019 10:45:10   #
Going to Phoenix area beginning of December to visit a relative but will have a few days to site see/photography. Saguaro is only about 2 hours away but in doing some research I didn't realize how huge it is! Looking for some recommendations that are a easy relatively short hikes (couple of miles) or something else of interest in Phoenix area. Have already done Grand Canyon and Sedona in previous trips.
Go to
Sep 21, 2019 06:44:31   #
Gene51 wrote:
Yes. Focus-HDR then advance the focus-HDR and repeat for each focus point. Merge each focus point to HDR, sync your adjustments for each HDR set, then export the resulting dng files to Photoshop for pano stitching.


Thabjs
Go to
Sep 20, 2019 15:28:11   #
Gene51 wrote:
It's not that hard to do. Figure out what your focus bracket is going to look like, and take an HDR set for each focus point. Merge each HDR set in Lightroom. When they are all done, adjust one of the resulting dng - essentially the same as a raw file - until you are satisfied with the result - then sync the adjustments to the other dng files. With all the dng files looking pretty similar, then export the images to Photoshop for pano stitching. You can try it the other way, processing the focus stack first then doing the HDR merge, but I think you'll find the adjustment options on HDR better when you are working with dng files than with tiff or psd.
It's not that hard to do. Figure out what your foc... (show quote)


So this method I'd do the focus stack manually in camera but set the bracketing for each focus point and then blend in photoshop
Go to
Sep 20, 2019 12:57:32   #
Jim-Pops wrote:
I have done focus stacking first. Once this is done I have opened in Photoshop Camera Raw, Created 3 exposure setting one as shot, one -1 and one +1 then combined the 3 using Aurora HDR and saved this image just as it was when Aurora opened it. Some times I adjust the sliders for the setting in the -1 and + 1 to add shadow or improve sky for the under exposed and over exposed.
The final results does not look HDR it is just a more evenly distributed light.


Excellent, sometimes we overlook the obvious - thanks a lot!
Go to
Sep 20, 2019 11:20:25   #
via the lens wrote:
The current version via subscription of LR Classic does this. You'll need to experiment to see how it works for you.


I am up to date with both but don't see an option to do both. Would I just take the layers and do the usual for focus stacking and then just run the bracketing steps, skipping align?
Go to
Sep 20, 2019 10:57:58   #
I shoot mainly landscape with a Nikon 850 and know how to focus stack and exposure bracket but was wondering if there's a way to do them with the same series of photos or even combine 2 separate series in PS or Lightroom? I understand I can do the focus stack series and then take another shot exposing for the sky and then blend them in PS after I'm done with the stacking, but this can be very tedious especially with trees or other things breaking the horizon.

I have googled and found tons of stuff and the subjects separately but nothing about combining them.

I though maybe someone had figured out a work around.
Go to
Sep 6, 2019 07:59:32   #
tshift wrote:
Thanks for the information.

Tom


No problem
Go to
Sep 6, 2019 07:41:17   #
That was the total but I didn't have them repair the lens since it was a nikon 50 1.8 and I could almost buy a used one for what they were going to charge. BTW - the lens seems to work fine. It did take almost 6 weeks from the time the store sent it to them till the time I got it back.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.