Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: The Fonz
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Feb 18, 2014 16:39:49   #
kid in 2040: "whats a RAW file, daddy?" :)
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 14:11:31   #
SharpShooter wrote:
Rac, I keep telling myself that. So I keep on trying. But after 8 wives, I'm starting to rethink it, as marriage is almost costing as much as my photography!! :lol:
Rac, how much longer should I try? I really need a new camera, but I don't know how to cook! What to do, what to do? :lol:
SS


There is your problem: Learn how to cook!
(Re:What to do, camera-wise: Larger sensors are more fun!) My favourite toy is a 5x7" :) - camera that is....I'm in love.....
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 11:38:12   #
"because things like this keep the camera people in business."
- Uphill battle that. 43% decrease in DSLR AND compact camera sales across the board last year, thanks largely to e.g. smart-phones (which reflects the trend to ease-of-use and technical non-commitment of the average owner - i.e. most cameras have become overkill).
[Personally, I haven't bought gear (let alone new gear) since 2009, nor do I see an urgent need to re-evaluate that.]
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 11:03:44   #
- Photographed sea-ice from underneath by putting my tripod and camera upside down under it. 4s exposures...
- Built a 5x7" underwater camera and started to lug that about to get a different shot (not that daredevily I guess, just a technical effort).
- "Trespassed" a fair few times as well, I think....
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 08:00:55   #
I kept a rough tab on my purchases and sales until recently via a spreadsheet, when I got bored with the exercise and saw the generally positive trend. I have owned way over 100 lenses and close to 100 cameras, but have been out-of-pocket less than $4000 over the last 20 years. Reason: Nearly nothing I bought was ever new gear and I usually traded well. Not getting paranoid about "upgrading" helps; I just buy stuff in kits and sell what doesn't work for me, or is in excess of needs.
Now I have three 35mm cameras, one DSLR with a few lenses, three cheap medium format cameras and one large format camera, also with a few cheapish lenses. Am going to cut down further to one 35mm camera and one medium format camera (keeping the DSLR and LF). Less seems more.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 07:40:42   #
I had a lens for Nikon until recently: A 65mm f0.75 Astro Tachon ... Mount diameter obviously wasn't the problem. :)
(filter size 95mm). It only fitted my F2 with the prism off though.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 06:47:13   #
Got a mint Vivitar 200mm f3.5, M42: 40$ plus 30$ shipping from the UK. Built-in hood; filter size 62mm, runs smooth and like new.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 06:42:09   #
'Love that reply, Winterrose :) Hey, I used to live around Hope Island; loved the place!
I'm personally not brand loyal; nothing wrong with Canons etc. either of course.
Back to the question: Personally, I'd be over the DX/FX swapping game; but then I play with too many other formats anyway (DX to 5x7"). Running about with only one system seems easier to me.
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 08:20:10   #
Not sure what you want this for; not counting excess pixels one hopes. Sensational photos have been taken for the last 100 years.
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 20:00:23   #
Schneideritis is not delamination, as earlier suggested (I just read that, sorry :)), either. Delamination would indeed have been more serious.
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 19:45:54   #
Well, to be fair, the 28-300 is a really nice walk-around lens, but is not particularly good at isolating the subject from the background.
Personally, for an FX Nikon and good flexibility, getting a 17-35 (or 16-35), a 50 (1.8/1.4/1.2...whatever) and the 70-200/2.8 is a great set to have and so many pros use that as their standard kit. If you do a lot of portrait work; augment that with a fast 85, and/or, say, a 135/2 DC. However, these lenses only shine, if you know what you're doing. Most people have far nicer gear than their skills will do justice these days, but then pros appreciate that, too: At least that keeps the prices down.
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 18:27:55   #
Good point.... RAW vs jpeg "discussions" aside, I am somewhat comforted by the fact that I occasionally still shoot (e.g. 5x7" ) on film. Many of those images, taken over the last 13 years, are favourites of mine; those images can still be printed in the next century, by whatever method and medium then available. But I am not intending to open the dumb digital vs. analogue discussion. Just sayin'; I use both and find saving digital files in more than one format the obvious and easy answer.
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 18:12:15   #
...unless you want to isolate your subject.
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 18:09:37   #
Well, I better suggest to Dave Burnett that he stop using his Holga then, LOL.
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 17:22:09   #
Pre-AI lenses won't mount. ALL other non-mirror lock-up F-mount Nikkors will be fine on the D7000 (bar those dumb Pronea IX-lenses). One of the nicest DX cameras out there.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.