Drop Box works well for me.
I primarily shoot landscape and wildlife. For landscape, I prefer metal and so do most of my clients. That is especially true in larger sizes. Wildlife seems to seek more variety and Moab papers are the most popular but Ilford gets some praise, too.
I have used Backblaze for a couple of years now and really like it.
Image Master's recommendations are spot on. I have similar setup and no complaints.
Let me add one other note. The 5DIV is a tough body. I was on a shoot in Nevada with that body when I tripped and fell. My camera went flying through the air and landed on hard ground about 10 or more feet away. I feared it would be seriously damaged. I took it to Canon's most recent repair facility in Burbank, CA. In 15 minutes they returned it to me and said it was neither shaken, stirred nor scratched. It continues to work just fine. So, my vote is 5DIV for sure.
While I rarely shoot fires, I do shoot a lot of wildlife and often in difficult settings. I currently carry two bodies -- Cannon 5DIV and Canon 7D. Of the various pairings I have shot over the years, the current combination has proved to be the best with a variety of of lenses and I have becomes a confirmed two body shooter.
I used Ed Hamrick's updated, revised and polished software and still am working on copying hundreds of 35mm images to my storage disc working with Windows 10. All the copies are sharp and can be polished if needed in Photoshop. Some have appeared in my last couple of books and look just fine.
I have been using the almost legendary Nikon Coolscan IV with Ed Hamrick's VueScan software. Ed totally upgraded the software for the Nikon scanner and I have been very happy with it. I realize that the scanner-- the last ever made by Nikon -- may be a bit hard to find. But it and Vuscan are a match made in scanning heaven.
Very nice set of eagles. You earned those ticks the hard way. Congrats.
Robert...Great suggestions. I was about to add my thoughts but you really covered all the bases.
If you can find a Nikon CoolsvanIV scanner, it does an excellent job scanning 35mm slides and you can edit those files in Lightroom or other computer based editing tools.
After shooting several times on the outskirts of Los Angeles, I have concluded that both light pollution and air pollution can be factors and often are factors when trying to shoot a sharp moon. It gets better the further I get from the city. No surprise. I get much better results when shooting the moon in the Sierra.
Very , very nice Images in one of my favorite locals. Are we looking at Convict Lake in a couple of your fine shots?
Actually, that was my first thought. But exposure compensation was smack in the middle where it needed to be. But the memory cards (2) are totally blown out.