Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: don26812
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 next>>
Oct 24, 2020 11:43:16   #
don26812 wrote:
Same here.


Actually, when I first set up my P-100, I could not get it to connect with my WiFi, so I then hardwired it. :-)
Go to
Oct 24, 2020 11:12:35   #
quixdraw wrote:
Have had the printer for a few years - always hard wired and with WiFi light on. Haven't noticed any problems. What kinds of issues can be experienced?


Same here.
Go to
Sep 7, 2020 10:51:46   #
coskibum wrote:
Pictures with people that close their eyes.
Looking for a photo software program that can open peoples eyes.


I suspect most consumer photo editors include that capability. For many years now Adobe's Photoshop Elements has included it. It was improved a bit ago, and now works even better. The Auto mode almost always gets the job done. You do not even have to select the eyes.

Of course, a normal price of about $80 is a lot to pay for the ability to open eyes. But PSE 2020 contains lot more magic.
Go to
Aug 21, 2020 15:51:43   #
amfoto1 wrote:
Actually, this thread has stayed on the tangent of the original question asking for feedback about the original 7D.

You tried to take it another direction by asking if there would be a 7D Mark III.

Is it any surprise that you didn't see much response? To get your question seen it would have been better to start a new thread, rather than hijacking someone else's thread.

All that said...

Canon has tried to market the 90D as replacement for both 80D and 7D Mark II. Both the older models are still in stock many places and are currently being offered at a discount. Brand new 80D are $100 off ($999)... while 7D Mark II are $250 off ($1399). Comparatively, 90D aren't discounted ($1199). All prices are for body only from B&H Photo, an authorized Canon dealer.

Is Canon discounting the older models to clear the shelves, or is this just a reaction to the slowed photo market and current economic uncertainties?

Personally I hope Canon will produce a 7D Mark III. I don't consider the 90D a very direct replacement for it.

7D-series cameras have been the most pro-oriented APS-C models Canon has produced. They are sort of like scaled down 1D/1DX-series cameras.

- With one exception, 7D-series have been the only Canon other than 1D/1DX-series to use dual processors running in parallel AND to have a discrete chip dedicated to running the AF system. (The exception is 5DS/5DS-R, which have dual processors to handle very large image files, but do not use a discrete AF chip.)

- 7D Mark II uses a unique, 65-point AF system that in most ways is equal to or better than the 45-point AF system in the 90D. With certain lenses, 90D has more f/8 capable AF points. And it has a superior Live View AF system. But for sports/wildlife the viewfinder AF system of the older 7DII is generally superior. It's viewfinder is also slight larger (1.0X versus 0.95X, if memory serves).

- 7DII is better built... more metal exterior panels, higher durability rating (200,000 shutter actuations versus 120K rating for 90D), probably better sealed for dust/weather resistance.

- 7DII has dual memory card slots, 90D only has a single one.

- 7DII BG-E16 vertical battery grip is superior to the BG-E14 that the 90D gets as a hand-me-down from 80D and 70D. The 7DII's grip has a more complete set of controls. They include a secondary joystick and an AF pattern toggle switch. Although a joystick has been added to the 90D camera body (a good thing!), 70D and 80D didn't have either of those on the body and so the battery grip designed for them doesn't have them either.

- 7DII can't do 4K video and 90D has an articulated Touchscreen LCD, which the 7DII lacks. One might argue those are more "consumer" items than "pro" (along with WiFi, GPS and some other geegaws).

While I certainly would like to see Canon produce a 7D Mark III... I'm not very hopeful. I'm not sure the market supports it at present. Camera sales have really slumped the last couple years. Canon has done well enough (outselling the next three manufacturers combined), but still has seen a significant drop in sales. The rare bright spots are in mirrorless cameras (putting aside whether or not those are "better" or the right or wrong choice for some people's uses).

Canon has just recently submitted two cameras for certification... though we don't know much about them. They used a "DS" prefix in their coding, which suggests either DSLR or full frame mirrorless. In the past they've used that designation with EOS DSLRs and R-series... but a "PC" prefix for M-series (APS-C mirrorless) and Powershot (non-interchangeable lens digitals... "point n shoots" to "bridge"). These will possibly (probably?) be announced before the end of the year. Place your bets now... a high MP R-series (75 to 83MP?.... Aside from the 7DII (which already has had a year longer market life than it's predecessor), the oldest APS-C DSLR is the most entry-level Rebel T7/2000D (aka 1500D in Asia). Those models are updated fairly often, though the last time little change was made (mostly just a newer sensor). The other current APS-C Canon models, aside from 7DII, aren't that old. Third possibility is a full frame DSLR, but Canon has said "no more 5D-series and 1DXIII is fresh out of the gate. That leaves only the 6DII as a possibility... but that model is only three years old.

Maybe one of the new cameras is a 7D Mark III.... wouldn't that be cool! The only problem, to come to market by the end of this year it would have been in development when the 90D was intro'd a year ago, at which time Canon stated that camera was the replacement for both 80D and 7DII.

Whoops! Looks like I'm even guiltier about hijacking this thread!
Actually, this thread has stayed on the tangent of... (show quote)


You are absolutely right, I had totally forgotten that I had asked my question in a comment. I apologize for that. But I am glad someone did address my question with some details and apparent knowledge. Since much of my photography is sports, the frame rate and quick focusing capabilities are prime features to me.
Go to
Aug 20, 2020 13:34:51   #
Well, this thread has gone off on a tangent relative to my original question. :-)

That in itself provides the answer.
Go to
Aug 19, 2020 11:54:38   #
Any rumors about Canon ever introducing a update to the 7D Mk II? That is my current camera. I started and still have the 7D.
Go to
Jul 19, 2020 12:00:27   #
The chart comparing the versions of PSE is a very good starting point. It and the advice from another poster to download the trial version are both good advice.

I found the comment that PSE 2020 is a mature product and thus implying the current version may not be that much improved over PSE 14 to be somewhat interesting. Photoshop itself is well over 20 years old. I think most people would not want to use one of the early versions.

One other low risk quick idea. Watch PSE 2020 YouTube videos to get a feel for the program. You can do that quickly, and not risk missing the sale price. Moreover, based on history we are over halfway through the product cycle for PSE 2020 and other sales will be coming along. But the $69 price certainly is a good one.

The bottom line are the improvements to the program since PSE 14, features you would use?

FWIW
Go to
Apr 30, 2020 23:23:26   #
bsprague wrote:
"I read it somewhere." "Some guy on this forum told me that."

I read that a lot too. But, I don't think it is true. The coding teams are separated by a couple oceans. One appears centered in North America and the other is near Mumbai. Read the scrolling credit screens in Help > About.

One has "Quick", "Guided" and "Expert" modes. The other has endless graphics tools. That's different code. Tool icons and workflows are similar. The update and release cycles are very different.

It may be that at one time an early version was "dumbed down", but the two products went different ways for different markets.

In the end, it makes no difference. They both work well at what they are supposed to do for the people they are targeted to help.
"I read it somewhere." "Some guy o... (show quote)


Both Lightroom Classic and Photoshop Elements use database technology, Elements in its Organizer, and Lightroom Classic in the Library module. Using database technology to manage images yields a much more robust approach than simply using a file manager.
Go to
Apr 30, 2020 12:26:10   #
CAPaez wrote:
Hi, fellow Uglyhedgehogs!
I am new to the group and I like to draw on your knowledge.
I am not as experience photographer as most of you. My shooting is mostly done on vacations. I love landscaping and
photos of architectural.
Since I know have time, I am going to work on my photos and I find myself wondering which is best, Lightroom or Photoshop Element.
I have a lot (thousands) of pictures to work on. Many are JPEG (until I learned)about raw. Now I shoot on both. Unfortunately most of the pictures are in jpeg format.
Is Lightroom only a subscription base software?
Which is easier to learn? Which is gives better control?
With all that info, which would you recommend- Lt or E? Would you have both for different applications?
Thank you. In advance!
Hi, fellow Uglyhedgehogs! br I am new to the group... (show quote)


By now you have seen a lot of good information from the group. In many respects, they are opinions and preference. So let me throw mine into the pot.

1. Remember, Lightroom was initially designed for professional photographers to help them manage and edit their huge quantity of photos efficiently. Elements on the other had was designed for the amateur consumer.
2. Both have evolved over the past years and are good at managing and editing photos.
3. Traditionally, Lightroom has been viewed as harder to learn than Elements. But, to a large extent, I believe that is based on what you started with first.
4. There is no question that Lightroom is more powerful program than Elements. But, for example, Elements has an Organizer that easily and efficiently can manage large numbers of photos. Photo collections of greater than 50K are easily managed. Like Lightroom, it uses database technology.
5. Like Lightroom, it can handle RAW images but as expected its options are less powerful.
6. And of course, its Expert mode is similar to Photoshop CC but simplified.
7. I am not sure about Lightroom, but I do know you can download a free 30-day trial of Elements. I my gues in that amount of time, you will be able to see if it satisfies your current needs and gives you room to grow.
8. If and when you outgrow Elements, Lightroom Classic provides a command to automatically convert your Elements Organizer Catalog to Lightroom with your keywords etc intact.

I started with Elements in 2001 or so. I have used it, taught it, and tested it for Adobe since then. But I have also been testing Lightroom for a few years. Last year I converted my 80K collection of photos/videos to Lightroom classic. It was time for me to move on and learn new things.

The bottom line is Elements served me well, and I still revert back to it from time to time, and continue beta testing. I also use Photoshop CC when the other two programs do not meet my needs.

FWIW
Go to
Apr 26, 2020 22:41:08   #
gvarner wrote:
That’s good to know that it backs up everything. I had read about LR and assumed that Elements did the same thing. Thanks for the info.


It's all good.
Go to
Apr 26, 2020 11:46:47   #
gvarner wrote:
I’m not sure of Elements makes backup copies copies of the original photos during its backup procedure. I think it just backs up the Catalogue database with the edit data, its thumbnails for viewing in the Organizer and the links to the file locations. That’s why I always copy my originals to a folder on an external drive first And then copy that folder to my HD before importing into Elements. You could copy yours to another external drive before importing.


I have used this pair of commands for many years (including the Restore step), so I know it works. And, as you recall, the original poster said he had contacted Adobe. BTW, the Organizer's Backup command is unlike Lightroom Classic in this regard. Lightroom only backs up the Catalog, not the photos themselves. The Organizer backs up everything.
Go to
Apr 26, 2020 11:19:18   #
dadorphan wrote:
Thanks to everyone for their detailed suggestions. I wound up contacting Adobe and as a result am purchasing another a (4 TB) backup drive. I will then use “back up and restore” on Photoshop Element’s Organizer to restore my photos to that new backup drive. Thanks again.

Michael


Michael, that is the easiest way, and will work great. That is why Adobe included the Backup and Restore commands in the Organizer. I have used this approach for many years to upgrade equipment, move from one computer to another, etc. As part of your process, first Reconnect any files in your current Catalog. Also, before backing up, Repair and Optimize your current Catalog. The idea is you want your current Catalog to be as clean as possible, before backing it up. Do all of this prior to running the Backup command. I assume that you will be backing up onto a separate drive drive than where you plan to store your originals.

By the way, you want to make sure the Catalog is stored on an internal drive. It's not that large. That way, Elements will run efficiently. Elements has a command to move the Catalog if you need to.

Finally, depending upon the number of items in your Catalog, the process could take a few hours.
Go to
Apr 22, 2020 12:44:59   #
If you just started the Organizer for the first time, its Catalog is empty. They need to be imported to show up there. The pictures are where they have been. The Catalog is a database. It does not hold the pictures, just information about them, including where on your computer they are stored.

The Catalog is like a card catalog in the public library. It hold info regarding the books, but they are on the shelves. Your situation is analogous to a library where the card catalog is empty. No one has filled out the information and inserted the cards yet.

OK, so we don't use card catalogs anymore, but a computer instead. Doesn't matter, we can't go to the library anyway. :-) Stay safe.

FWIW
Go to
Apr 21, 2020 18:55:51   #
That's a good approach, especially if you have not edited the photo yet. You could do that along the way.
Go to
Apr 21, 2020 12:03:20   #
I may have missed something you have already tried. But maybe this will help. From you comments, you seem to be quite knowledgeable about the Organizer, so my suggestions will be brief. Feel free to post back if I am not being clear.

1. Have you tried searching for a couple of them by filename? Also, make sure that they are not Hidden.
2. Assuming that does not work, try this test. Using Windows Explorer, copy a few to a new folder that is very easy to find.
3. Once there, again in Windows Explorer, rename them in some way.
4. Now back in the Organizer, try to import them, and see what happens. If you are successful, do this to the remainder of the problem photos.

Trying the above will not impact your existing folder of photos, as you know.

FWIW
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.