Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Posts for: cannie
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Jun 9, 2012 09:54:29   #
cwilliams31 wrote:
Know what you mean - Some like Ken - Some don't because Ken is very opinionated.
MT Shooter is a very smart man tho.
He knows what he's talking about.
I'm defiantly not happy with my 18-135 but I'm sure he could recomend something starting with 18mm.


I had the 70-200mm and traded for the 18-200mm and I couldn't be happier. I have considered going to the 28-300mm, but after lots of reading, and the help of UGLY HEDGEHOG information, I am sticking with my 18-200mm. Just adding my 2 cents worth if it helps. :lol:
Go to
Jun 8, 2012 12:33:34   #
Frank T wrote:
I have a 28-300 and it's tack sharp but I don't think that the quality is, "significantly" different". In fact I've used both and I don't see a difference other than the 28-300 gives you a little bit more "reach".


Thanks Frank. I can probably make up for the reach in PSE, zooming in or cropping. It's that tack sharp I like, I don't fell my 18-200 gives me that. Maybe it is just my setting.
Go to
Jun 8, 2012 10:26:44   #
I have a Nikon 18mm-200mm DX VR lens, the only lens I use. Would there be a big difference in picture quality if I buy a 28mm-300mm VR lens? ( I have a NiKon D7000) FYI: My photography style is nature and landscape.
Go to
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Jun 7, 2012 10:31:07   #
marcomarks wrote:
cannie wrote:
Nikonian72 wrote:
UHH has our own Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Forum at http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-106-1.html

Here is one pertinent to your question:
FAQ: Sensor Sizes Chart & Comparative Format Views
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-26503-1.html


Now you have my little head spinning with all kinds of numbers and facts. I am just simple minded, if I want more picture in my view finder, I just back up, that is step back until I see what I want to capture. I have a D7000 Nikon, with a 18- 200mm DX- VR lens. I was thinking of going to a 28-300mm FX VR lens, but I hear the difference between the 200MM and 300MM is just backing up 2 or 3 steps to get the longer shot. Please let me know am I on track or am I just crazy and need to forget all this and just leave the camera on AUTO and not worry about anything but having fun.
quote=Nikonian72 UHH has our own b Frequently As... (show quote)


Lens length has absolutely nothing to do with the size of the sensor inside the camera body that captures the image. This thread concerns a larger solid-state sensor (translated as far more expensive) having better clarity and color definition compared to a smaller "crop" sensor (like your D7000 and most entry to mid-level dSLRs on down to P&S models) having less clarity and color definition when taking the same picture.
quote=cannie quote=Nikonian72 UHH has our own b... (show quote)


Sounds good to me translated as I DON"T NEED TO THINK about this... :lol:
Go to
Jun 7, 2012 01:09:34   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
UHH has our own Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Forum at http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-106-1.html

Here is one pertinent to your question:
FAQ: Sensor Sizes Chart & Comparative Format Views
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-26503-1.html


Now you have my little head spinning with all kinds of numbers and facts. I am just simple minded, if I want more picture in my view finder, I just back up, that is step back until I see what I want to capture. I have a D7000 Nikon, with a 18- 200mm DX- VR lens. I was thinking of going to a 28-300mm FX VR lens, but I hear the difference between the 200MM and 300MM is just backing up 2 or 3 steps to get the longer shot. Please let me know am I on track or am I just crazy and need to forget all this and just leave the camera on AUTO and not worry about anything but having fun.
Go to
Jun 6, 2012 18:59:30   #
coco1964 wrote:
Just looking at a D300 about a week ago and the gal at my camera store said that a D400 was in the works. She may have been refering to the D600 and I misunderstood. The D7000 is a better camera and is $1000 cheaper than the D300.....


Thanks that makes me feel better since I have a D7000. I am trying to learn to take it off AUTO. (AUTO is just so quick) click, click, click. DONE.
Go to
Jun 6, 2012 11:54:22   #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
cannie wrote:

I may be wrong, but I thought on the D7000 you can puta FX lens. Do I even know what I am talking about???? Just trying to learn.. :shock:

Yep. Do it all the time.
70-200, 24-70 are great on the D7000.
You can do it the other way and put a DX lens on the FX body, but it crops because it doesn't cover the whole sensor, so what's the point.


YES....... I think I am learning :lol:
Go to
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Jun 6, 2012 11:37:09   #
jerryc41 wrote:
GoofyNewfie wrote:
jerryc41 wrote:
Bekkie wrote:
I've heard rumors of a D600, a full frame camera.

I think it's a matter of when, not if. http://mansurovs.com/is-nikon-d600-on-the-horizon


I've read September...I'm holding off buying another D7000 or D700 ( for the low noise) for the possibility of the D600.

I'm waiting for the D7100. I'd rather have an upscale DX than a downscale FX. Besides, most of my lenses are DX.


I may be wrong, but I thought on the D7000 you can puta FX lens. Do I even know what I am talking about???? Just trying to learn.. :shock:
Go to
Jun 6, 2012 11:22:39   #
thank you for all the site information you guys are great.
Go to
Jun 6, 2012 10:18:50   #
VERY NICE....I would love one, but last year I bought the D7000, so I have to wait a COUPLE OF YEARS before I can even think about another Nikon. Have fun shooting.
Go to
Jun 2, 2012 11:11:08   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Ashok wrote:
I am new to these two cameras- which camera would you all exerienced photgraphers suggest - as a long term investment- or do I look at Sony?
thanks

I think you will find that the camera will not be a long-term investment. Unlike the film cameras of yesteryear, digital bodies are replaced by new models about every two years. I have a D7000, and I'm looking forward to seeing what the D7100 will be like.

What people generally do is stick with brand and concentrate on getting good lenses. Cameras comes and go, but lenses are forever. That's where you want to avoid compromising.

As for deciding what camera to buy, I always like to read reviews by people who compare cameras for a living.

Camera Reviews
kenrockwell.com
dpreview.com
snapsort.com
http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equipment.html

Lens Reviews
http://kenrockwell.com
http://photozone.de/
http://dpreview.com

Info:
http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html
quote=Ashok I am new to these two cameras- which ... (show quote)



Jerry, I like your reply, you give a wealth of information. Reference to site's is an added bonus. P.S. I have a Nikon D7000, and it's not my first NIKON.... :mrgreen:
Go to
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
May 31, 2012 20:57:39   #
jerryc41 wrote:
cannie wrote:
After using my D7000 on Auto for the past year, I want to start with manual setting. I have read the manual but still need more direction. Can someone recommend a book I can buy that would spell out the full capabilities of this camera in EASY to read and understand terms. Or should I just go ahead and take a private camera class for the D7000?

This might seem like heresy here, but don't knock Auto. I leave my cameras set on Auto so that if something catches my attention, I can take a quick shot without worrying about settings. If the subject is still there, I can experiment.
Many times, I have found that the Auto shot was better than my experimenting in A, S, or M. Of course, for specific shots, aperture or shutter speed might be of prime importance, so then Auto goes out the window.
quote=cannie After using my D7000 on Auto for the... (show quote)


Jerry AUTO is diffently my best friend. Just after joining Ugly Hedgehog, and reading what is said about the D7000 I decided to take a little time to learn the camera. Thanks for your input please keep up with me and let me know how I am doing. Will post pic's soon for feedback.
Go to
May 31, 2012 19:43:51   #
Mac wrote:
cannie wrote:
The response to my question has been great, I want to thank everyone for the information. I am on my way to better pictures.


Don't forget get to let us see them.


That's a deal... :mrgreen:
Go to
May 31, 2012 13:25:41   #
The response to my question has been great, I want to thank everyone for the information. I am on my way to better pictures.
Go to
May 31, 2012 10:14:55   #
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
DonTX wrote:
As you can see there is a yellowish lens flare next to the window on this building (taken in Pidgeon Forge, TN). Is there anything that can be done to get rid of or reduce this flare?

Thanks!

Don in TX


You can avoid lens flairs while shooting. The simplest way to see if you are likely to get a lens flare is to turn around, 180 degrees, from your shooting position and hold the camera out, away from you. If the sunlight is illuminating the lens, then, you have a good chance for lens flare.

If you have someone with you, simply ask them, when you are composing the picture, to look at your lens, and, above your camera, place a hand in the way of the sun, to cast a shadow on the lens. Bingo. No flair possible. Lens shades help, but are not a complete solution. A hand, a hat, a clipboard, a magazine... anything that can cast a shadow on the lens... these are the tricks of the trade.
quote=DonTX As you can see there is a yellowish l... (show quote)



OMG.....I can't believe you said to use your hand....that is what I do because I don't like the lens hoods. I thought if I wrote to use your hand readers would think I lost my mind. Thank you for making me feel better about my technique.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.