A better question would be "is there scientific evidence to refute the existence of a creator?".

No, ole sarg, it's you who doesn't know very much. The government's accounting says that it costs more than $200,000 per hour to fly Air Force 1. That no doubt includes all the luxury, security, support etc. that the president requires. So let's assume that the real cost to fly Air Force 1 is $25,000-$30,000 per hour which are the normally understood rates for flying a Boeing 747.

Candidates and their campaigns pay what it would cost to charter a plane for only the campaign staff. Assuming that to be the equivalent of chartering a Boeing 757, that would be about $8,000 per hour. So the taxpayers are stuck with the remaining $20,000 plus per hour to fly a commercial 747, or the remaining $200,000 per hour to fly AF1.

http://www.npr.org/2016/07/07/485097272/fact-check-air-force-one-who-pays

Pregnancies resulting from rape are a moral dilemma indeed, and our policies should have an exemption available in those cases. If you add up all the pregnancies caused by rape as well as a******ns done due to health of the mother and health of the infant, that is still less than 10% of the total a******ns. An a******n is the taking of a human life, and the ability to do so should be severely limited.

Whether or not Trump is an asshole, Hillary appears to have gotten favorable treatment from the law that most citizens would not have received.

They are. Just as are the modern day Dems.

If you imagine the politicians as teams on a football field, in the 1940s to 1960s it would have been like the Democrats were on the left side 40 yard line and the Republicans on the right side 40 yard line. Now the Republicans have backed up to about the 20 yard line while the Democrats have backed up halfway through the parking lot.

Unfortunate, indeed. By the time a woman is making the decision to have an a******n, at least one tragedy has already taken place. Probably more. Now it will be compounded by the taking of a human life.

I'll tell you about conservatives supporting pursuit of happiness for women seeking a******ns as soon as you tell me about liberals supporting life for the unborn.

You don't like it because it's in sterling rather than bucks?

You are correct that the GOP congress was very one-sided in these things. The difference is that the GOP congress is toothless when it comes to politics and political maneuvering. They need a few more Rahm Emanuels and Nancy Pelosis and a few fewer Darrell Issas and Paul Ryans in the GOP if they want to accomplish anything.

I didn't say anything to contradict what Comey stated. I said that the media would certainly treat another person quite differently than they are treating Hillary. I said maybe the FBI/prosecutors would do so as well.

Whether or not this investigation was r****d, it's more than obvious that Obama's administration is very one-sided in it's administration of the law. Eric Holder and the New Black Panthers in Philadelphia. Lois Lerner and tax exemption applications. John Koskinen and destruction of evidence regarding the same topic. Janet Napolitano and her labeling of armed forces veterans as "right wing extremists"

Which conservatives do you observe who want SMALL government and a BIG military? The ones in office want BIG government and a BIG military.

I'm sure that Comey didn't "see those things here". At the same time, I have a hard time believing that both the media wouldn't "see those things here" if there were some other person under investigation. Maybe the FBI or prosecutors as well. I have no belief that either the media or the government are even-handed in cases like this.

Are you describing all expatriates as t*****rs? That seems unlikely.

Fortunately our resident Democrats don't resort to the same language and similar attacks.

Just out of curiosity - was that wet dream that the law applies equally to all?