Roscomar wrote:
Just curious to know how long it took for any "Hoggers" who purchased the Leica Q from B&H to actually receive it. It's been almost two months and counting. I've been a long-time loyal customer with B&H, but starting to wish I'd ordered directly from The Leica Store.
I really don't know but doubt seriously if any Hoggers (as you put it) have ever managed to get a copy of the Q from B&H, or any other bona fide Leica dealer for that matter. Just did a quick check of the web sites of: Adorama, popflash.photo, Classic Connection LLC; as well as the local (DC) Leica Store, Leica Store Miami and Leica Store San Francisco, and all are still listing the Q as either a pre-order or out of stock item. Hell, same situation with Leica Store London Mayfair and even
Leica Store Berlin (Bitte Liefertermin erfragen! i.e., Please ask about delivery date). Although there are online hands-on reviews e.g.,
The Leica Q
in Review and what
may be pre-production copies floating around for sale by Scalpers :) on
Amazon and
eBay, there sure seems to be some widespread availability problem.
wj cody wrote:
great camera. when now using her mamiya rz 67, Annie Leibowitz (sp?) is using the S2 with great success.
Graham Smith was making reference to the new
mirrorless SL, not the medium format S2 (DSLR).
Marilyng wrote:
Oh I thought it would help as in the winter when the snow is to deep to venture out I take a lot of photos from my sliding glass door.I was told the filter would help,not true then?
Im wondering if the recommendation could have been for you to buy a
polarizing filter, not a UV. These arent magical devices by any means but where you might want to take a photo
through your sliding glass doors, for example, a filter of this type can help in reducing interior reflections in some cases.
At any rate, Id second MtnMans suggestion. Everyone should a have polarizer. (And there are a slew of
prior threads on that topic.)
ginbudjim wrote:
I was sruck by the cost as well.
Me too. Out of curiosity I plugged one dollar into BLSs
CPI Inflation Calculator and the price is equivalent to $17.12 US in todays money. For a little perspective of sorts, the March 1936 issue of
Popular Mechanics was selling for 25¢ (one quarter of
Fortunes price but actually not too shabby itself since that works out to $4.28). :)
jerryc41 wrote:
Two answers that Leica owners may post: Leicas never have problems; Leica owners learn how to use their cameras, so questions are not necessary. :D
Hmm. I agree with the last part of your statement although Id substitute
know for
learn. And for the record, here are my two, all prettied-up for their portrait. Ive had the M4 (left) -- Best
135 Camera
Ever as
Comic Book Guy might put it -- since the early 1970s; the (TYP 240) since the Summer of 2013. :) :)
mikec01 wrote:
I'm a Canon user and am saving for a longer lens. However, I came across this - the price is ridiculous - can it it be any good at all?
"Opteka 500mm f/8 HD Preset Telephoto Lens" - the price is $89! would this simply be a waste of money, or is it worth the risk? Any comments welcome.
Take a couple of minutes and watch this guys
You Tube review. Seems like a pretty fair assessment all in all, especially since Canons dont have in-body stabilization.
Indi wrote:
A while back someone posted information on this LensTab thingy. It's useful for manually focusing lenses.
I'd like to get a couple but when I go to Norton Safe Web and type in LensTab.com it tells me that it doesn't recommend disclosing financial info (i.e. credit cards.)
Has anyone bought any from their website or know of any other site I can buy it from?
Thanks.
The Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts TAAB dealer is
selling them on eBay if that's any help.
Quick clarification/update for any who might be interested.
The news that Cosina was throwing in the towel, as one blogger put it, with regard to their line of Voigtlander-branded products has shades of
Mark Twains famous misquote. Its true that some items were purged, however, it seems the enterprise is very much alive and well. In fact, the
RINGFOTO subsidiary company,
Voigtländer GmbH, just announced plans for some
new E-mount lenses for Sony users.
GoofyNewfie wrote:
The adapter is only half the battle. You would have to have a long bellows so you could focus it as well. ...
Not to worry, it can be done! (Check this out
HERE) :)
Martys wrote:
One of my sharpest lenses is a Voigtlander 40mm, f2 pancake lens, used on my Nikon camera, amazingly performer and very small in size.
Sorry to hear this news.
That side of the story, the cancellation of the actual lenses themselves,
is unfortunate especially since these so-called Voigtlanders are well made and of Cosinas own designs. Perhaps they will see fit to reissue some, like the 40mm f/2 you mention, under their own brand name in the future.
I really dont think this latest event is sad at all. As pointed out on the Wikipedia page,
Cosina Voigtländer:
Cosina started producing cameras and lenses
under the Voigtländer brand in 1999, when it introduced a new M39 mount body and lenses. It has since produced a prodigious variety of these lenses in M39x26, Leica M mount, Nikon S rangefinder mount (some fully usable with Contax RF bodies), and SLR mounts including M42 and Nikon F. Cosina produces hoods and accessory viewfinders for many of the lenses.
Note that while the lenses feature familiar Voigtländer names, the optical formulas are all new, with the exception of the limited-edition collapsible Heliar. [emphases added]
As MT Shooter remarked, the
real Voigtlander died decades ago. In an article on the subject of Voigtlander LF lenses,
Arne Cröll notes:
In 1970, the Voigtländer company was dissolved and merged into Zeiss-Ikon, although LF lenses still carried the Voigtländer name. In 1972, Zeiss-Ikon stopped the production of all product lines, including the Voigtländer LF lens production; existing stock was sold for a few more years afterwards.
And the rest of the history is nothing more than a succession of different firms, with no connection whatsoever to the original company, acquiring rights to the Voigtland brand name then turning around and licensing it to various Japanese and other manufacturers to paste on their products as, presumably, nothing more than a marketing ploy.
So Id say, anyway, Im glad this happened and, Voigtlander, R.I.P. :)
blackest wrote:
basically with an auto only m42 you need something to push the pin in.
And there are, in fact, M42 to K-mount adapters that will do that very thing. Here are two different examples. Youll note theres a bit of flange along the inside at the rear and this serves to depress the stop-down pin allowing the aperture blades to be operated manually. Ive used both with several different lenses on a K-20 body without problems such as misalignment of the focusing scale or (more important) loss of infinity focus.
The downside is that, after a quick search on Ebay, the least expensive Kipon I found retailed for around $40USD whereas the method you describe for shimming the pin is, obviously, free.
obeone wrote:
Thanks, I have friend who is interested in buying one and asked my advice. I figured some one on the Hogs would know. I'll pass this along
Well, a lot of people know. Click
HERE