Posts for: Beercat
Mar 13, 2014 11:44:24 #
I think this tread got morphed into something it wasn't.
The best basic advice I can give you is to place your camera in the "P" mode which will keep it in auto but your compensation dial will work.
Underexpose the picture. Try a few different settings but a -1.0 on your compensation is a good starting point.
You might also wish to try in the AV mode and extend your DOF to 16 or above then under expose, again starting at about -1.0
In post simply play with the "highlight" & Shadow settings. A bit of a tweak here and there should be all it needs.
The best basic advice I can give you is to place your camera in the "P" mode which will keep it in auto but your compensation dial will work.
Underexpose the picture. Try a few different settings but a -1.0 on your compensation is a good starting point.
You might also wish to try in the AV mode and extend your DOF to 16 or above then under expose, again starting at about -1.0
In post simply play with the "highlight" & Shadow settings. A bit of a tweak here and there should be all it needs.
Mar 13, 2014 10:42:57 #
A current article in a well known photography magazine will sort it out for you ....... From an article in Photography Monthly .....
The clue as to what a bridge camera offers is in its name. Bridge models slot in between digital compacts and DSLRs by offering the finer points of both genres. This makes them ideal for photographers who like the simplicity of a compact camera, although occasionally find it rather restrictive in terms of lens range and picture taking features, but don't want to make the leap to a full-blown DSLR. The models in this category, then, offer a 'bridge' between the two camps. Clever, eh?!
In most cases, a bridge camera also represents the middle ground in terms of physical size and handling ergonomics. Whereas a compact is largely about sleekness and pocketability, a bridge camera is typically a more sculptured affair with a chunky handgrip, sizeable rear LCD and large buttons that make function setting easier. While you could never describe a bridge camera as large, you'll certainly need to trade up a size or two in bags if you're currently a compact user.
Lenses on bridge cameras are fixed, but offer a whopping zoom range, so it's unlikely that you'll be left wanting when it comes to taking pictures. A typical zoom range will enable you to tackle everything from landscapes at the wide-angle end through to tame wildlife and sporting action at the telephoto end. They also focus reasonably close, so you'll be able to tackle some macro shots too. While having a fixed lens may be seen by some as a disadvantage (if you do, a DSLR is more your bag), it does mean that you'll never have any problems with dust getting on to the sensor and spoiling your shots.
When it comes to features, you'll find that most bridge camera have a foot firmly in the DSLR camp. While they offer the point-and-shoot simplicity of compacts, should you require it, they also have a DSLR-style set of exposure modes, metering patterns and file formats. Buying a bridge camera certainly won't prevent you from shooting using manual exposure, spot metering and the Raw file format should you so desire, such functions just maybe a little more hidden than they would be on a standard DSLR. Similarly, megapixel counts are also more likely to be in double figures, although they're not directly comparable to a DSLR as the sensors are smaller and so won't necessarily deliver the same results.
In most cases, then, a bridge camera can really be viewed as a DSLR with a lens that you can't change and, as such, are a very appealing proposition. Be warned, though, if you really enjoy using your bridge camera and get more involved in your picture taking there will be a time when you'll want to make the leap to a DSLR this photography lark can be highly addictive!
The clue as to what a bridge camera offers is in its name. Bridge models slot in between digital compacts and DSLRs by offering the finer points of both genres. This makes them ideal for photographers who like the simplicity of a compact camera, although occasionally find it rather restrictive in terms of lens range and picture taking features, but don't want to make the leap to a full-blown DSLR. The models in this category, then, offer a 'bridge' between the two camps. Clever, eh?!
In most cases, a bridge camera also represents the middle ground in terms of physical size and handling ergonomics. Whereas a compact is largely about sleekness and pocketability, a bridge camera is typically a more sculptured affair with a chunky handgrip, sizeable rear LCD and large buttons that make function setting easier. While you could never describe a bridge camera as large, you'll certainly need to trade up a size or two in bags if you're currently a compact user.
Lenses on bridge cameras are fixed, but offer a whopping zoom range, so it's unlikely that you'll be left wanting when it comes to taking pictures. A typical zoom range will enable you to tackle everything from landscapes at the wide-angle end through to tame wildlife and sporting action at the telephoto end. They also focus reasonably close, so you'll be able to tackle some macro shots too. While having a fixed lens may be seen by some as a disadvantage (if you do, a DSLR is more your bag), it does mean that you'll never have any problems with dust getting on to the sensor and spoiling your shots.
When it comes to features, you'll find that most bridge camera have a foot firmly in the DSLR camp. While they offer the point-and-shoot simplicity of compacts, should you require it, they also have a DSLR-style set of exposure modes, metering patterns and file formats. Buying a bridge camera certainly won't prevent you from shooting using manual exposure, spot metering and the Raw file format should you so desire, such functions just maybe a little more hidden than they would be on a standard DSLR. Similarly, megapixel counts are also more likely to be in double figures, although they're not directly comparable to a DSLR as the sensors are smaller and so won't necessarily deliver the same results.
In most cases, then, a bridge camera can really be viewed as a DSLR with a lens that you can't change and, as such, are a very appealing proposition. Be warned, though, if you really enjoy using your bridge camera and get more involved in your picture taking there will be a time when you'll want to make the leap to a DSLR this photography lark can be highly addictive!
Mar 12, 2014 16:38:38 #
This is a fine example of no right answer .......
The correct answer depends on the end user and what they are going to shoot with it. I shoot a bunch of video and I have small hands, I love the 70D I have. I love the touch screen for programing, when you get over 40 it's nice to not need to grab your reading glasses, the 'quick' mode is wonderful for programing.
The auto focus on the video works fine and as I said I shoot a bunch of video so the 70D was a no brainer over the 7D.
If I was using the camera strictly for stills I would choose differently.
As I said at the beginning, no right or wrong answer here, figure out your need and budget, then pick accordingly.
OK, about the Nikon v the Canon ...... you got to give the Canon Speedlighst an A+ ....... IMO, best on the market so I shoot a Canon over a Nikon as I do lots of flash work.
The correct answer depends on the end user and what they are going to shoot with it. I shoot a bunch of video and I have small hands, I love the 70D I have. I love the touch screen for programing, when you get over 40 it's nice to not need to grab your reading glasses, the 'quick' mode is wonderful for programing.
The auto focus on the video works fine and as I said I shoot a bunch of video so the 70D was a no brainer over the 7D.
If I was using the camera strictly for stills I would choose differently.
As I said at the beginning, no right or wrong answer here, figure out your need and budget, then pick accordingly.
OK, about the Nikon v the Canon ...... you got to give the Canon Speedlighst an A+ ....... IMO, best on the market so I shoot a Canon over a Nikon as I do lots of flash work.
Mar 12, 2014 16:00:15 #
Took this one on the fly last night out my back door. Set the exposure, turned on the on camera flash for fill and presto ....... if I had shot the picture 30 seconds later It wouldn't have been near as good. the 'real' beauty is my BH :mrgreen:
Mar 12, 2014 14:18:33 #
I always play with the 'highlights' & 'shadow' settings in post before I do anything else. IMO 80% of sunset pix fix is done in those 2 areas. People like to play with contrast & light exposure before they play with highlights and shadow settings during post edit ........ wrong ......... well IMO
Mar 12, 2014 14:02:58 #
Go to youtube and enter "Syl Arena Canon speedlight"
He has some nice classes on youtube he does for Canon. Syl is a speedlight freak ....... the more the better in his book
He has some nice classes on youtube he does for Canon. Syl is a speedlight freak ....... the more the better in his book
Mar 12, 2014 11:49:18 #
Another good choice, same sensor as the RX10 and the small package
:)
N Tom wrote:
I own a Panasonic FZ200 which I truly love for its... (show quote)
:)
Mar 12, 2014 11:10:08 #
I use a high end Canon and have 3 EX600 flash units.
I've done some similar off camera setups with 2 of the EX600's bouncing off the end walls and use the 3rd EX600 as the master plus a bit of fill. I love it! Great for quick setups where you want consistent results that are usually within the scope of easy/quick edits in LR. I love the EX600's ........... powerful and radio controlled, plus I can program each from the rear of my camera which is a huge plus with my aging eyes.
I know, expensive but well worth it for me as I do it for money.
I've done some similar off camera setups with 2 of the EX600's bouncing off the end walls and use the 3rd EX600 as the master plus a bit of fill. I love it! Great for quick setups where you want consistent results that are usually within the scope of easy/quick edits in LR. I love the EX600's ........... powerful and radio controlled, plus I can program each from the rear of my camera which is a huge plus with my aging eyes.
I know, expensive but well worth it for me as I do it for money.
Mar 12, 2014 10:50:36 #
Some of the cameras mentioned are not really "bridge cameras" :wink:
The Sony RX10 though larger than most is still considered a bridge camera.
What the RX10 has on all the other "bridge cameras" is the size of the sensor, the largest of all.
Another plus is the superb video so you now have a great 20MP still camera along with a very good video camera, all in one package. Some say the RX10 is heavy .......... it's the glass! Good glass usually has some weight to it and isn't cheap.
There are several other good bridge cameras, the question is which one fits your needs the best. As I take professional video I choose the RX10 because it was a great compromise to give me good quality video from a 1" composite sensor plus the need to take good stills to incorporate within my video edits, all in true bridge camera size :)
A few complaints I have with the RX10 is the LCD screen which has directional limitations. I also wish the shutter speed dial was a bit larger, plus I prefer touch screen menus but it does so much well I overlook some of the limitations.
When I shoot nothing but stills for money I still pull out my high end Canon but for a second body or travel camera I leave the Canon at home along with all the heavy extra equipment and now take the RX10.
The Sony RX10 though larger than most is still considered a bridge camera.
What the RX10 has on all the other "bridge cameras" is the size of the sensor, the largest of all.
Another plus is the superb video so you now have a great 20MP still camera along with a very good video camera, all in one package. Some say the RX10 is heavy .......... it's the glass! Good glass usually has some weight to it and isn't cheap.
There are several other good bridge cameras, the question is which one fits your needs the best. As I take professional video I choose the RX10 because it was a great compromise to give me good quality video from a 1" composite sensor plus the need to take good stills to incorporate within my video edits, all in true bridge camera size :)
A few complaints I have with the RX10 is the LCD screen which has directional limitations. I also wish the shutter speed dial was a bit larger, plus I prefer touch screen menus but it does so much well I overlook some of the limitations.
When I shoot nothing but stills for money I still pull out my high end Canon but for a second body or travel camera I leave the Canon at home along with all the heavy extra equipment and now take the RX10.
Mar 11, 2014 22:59:00 #
I have 9 cameras .........
One of them is a new Sony RX10. The new Sony bridge camera does very well against most of the 1.6X DSLR cameras and is way smaller.
Unless you want to carry around a full frame DSLR the new Sony RX10 is a great choice, a bridge camera with all the features found on most DSLR's except being able to change the lens but when you have a 25mm - 200mm that will hold 2.8 you really don't need to change much.
One of them is a new Sony RX10. The new Sony bridge camera does very well against most of the 1.6X DSLR cameras and is way smaller.
Unless you want to carry around a full frame DSLR the new Sony RX10 is a great choice, a bridge camera with all the features found on most DSLR's except being able to change the lens but when you have a 25mm - 200mm that will hold 2.8 you really don't need to change much.