"But, on the other side it didn't say nothin'.
That side was meant for you and me!"
Which pixma?
I have the ip8720, and have never had an "actual" problem.
When it tells me one or more cartridges are empty, I keep printing
until I get an ugly print - usually 20-25 pages (8-1/2 x 11's).
I have really beaten the hell out of it - approx 3000 prints in the past
13-14 months. Still playing catch up; just finished August 2019. Only
6-1/2 months to go. ☺☺☺
Instead of "Export", select "Export As".
Multiple choices; and give it any name you want.
🙌🙌🙌
Took my gear (D610, 2 lenses) in for trade. Offered a tad less than MPB, bit more than Adorama, without the shipping back and forth hassle.
Worked for me 👍👍
Sounds more like he wants to do a virtual/online book, not a physical one
Well planned or serendity = right place, right time
HDR, p/s preset, well planned PP workflow, or sooc
However you got there, it works for me
I'd find a spot to show it off
👍👍👏
Do,re,mi...weights and measures...scales of justice...fish...dragons?
Jack47 wrote:
Why do they call it Cloud storage?
"The answer, my friend..."
donrent wrote:
What in the hell WORLD do you fly around in ?
He's either "reached The Outer Limits", OR "crossed over to The Twilight Zone"
MTshooter - ask him for a quote
Linda S. wrote:
My camera is a Canon 5D4. I have the first version of Canon's 70 - 200mm f/2.8 lens, which is very heavy.
At the local camera store, I saw how much lighter the Canon 70 - 200mm f/4 image stabilized version 2 lens was. So I traded in my 2.8 for the 4.
My question is that the corner of the box that the 4 came in was crushed. The lens itself was stabilized within two pieces of Styrofoam ... one on the bottom and one on top of the lens.
It was the top corner that was crushed. That area contained the top of the styrofoam, the camera bag and the USA warranty.
I'm assuming that since the camera lens was in between the styrofoam that nothing really happened to it.
Is that a correct assumption? What is the best way to test the lens...take a series of shots at all the apertures?
Thank you in advance. I hope I was clear.
My camera is a Canon 5D4. I have the first version... (
show quote)
Why not just take the lens - and all the packaging - back to the store, and have them test it? Or replace it?
jabe750 wrote:
How do I find the optimal sharpness for a variety of my lenses? When I use manual focus on a particular subject it still seems not sharp.
Do you mean you want to find the "sweet spot" for each of your lenses? There have been numerous threads describing how to test for that. You can do a search here as well as on youtube. Good luck and good hunting! ✌👍
For years, the focus/hype was on pixel count. Then, the discussion shifted to the quality/size of the individual pixels. Not being an engineer, but having only a modicum of common sense to rely on, it would seem that there is a limit to sensor size (there's only so much you can fit inside the camera), and the number of pixels that will fit on said sensor. So the engineer must choose; more smaller pixels or fewer larger pixels. Which will result in gathering more data, produce higher IQ, better photos? Which matters most, size or quantity? Or is it all hype? Which department has the final say, enginering or marketing? Gentlemen, start your engines! 😈😈😈
rehess wrote:
No, anyone {including me} can make a mistake; if only perfect ones responded, the silence would be deafening.
I thought I made a mistake once, but I was wrong.
😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈