Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: abc1234
Page: <<prev 1 ... 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 ... 330 next>>
Jan 8, 2014 11:53:43   #
Chuck, pop for the Expodisc. It is so small and reliable and you never have worry about finding something "white" or "gray". You are too experienced to leave it to luck.

The odor was as much sulfurous acid from the sodium sulfite.

I do not want to tell you that you have to shoot raw but I will say that they give me so much more color detail than jpg's. If you like your jpg's, you may love your raw's. Actually, not the raw's themselves but the jpg's and tiff's you make from them.

The overlay adjustment layer is like flashing. I just learned about it and find it amazing. Check these out.

http://www.photoshopessentials.com/photo-editing/layer-blend-modes/multiply/
Go to
Jan 8, 2014 11:20:26   #
I like the low angle. It does wonders for making the adult look big, imposing and protective. Two of the chicks if that is the correct term are distracting. Also distracting are the plants around the main subject. I would add some blue to the sky.

Looks like some sharpening may have been done to the birds. They have wonderful detail that might be brought out better by tweaking the levels.

Keep photographing the birds. They are so interesting.
Go to
Jan 8, 2014 11:13:06   #
Chuck_893 wrote:
Thanks, ABC. I was playing with the "sunset" mode in the camera, which (so far as I know) is an intentional "whoopee" mode to zip up the color. It's not intended to be a perfectly accurate rendition (but in 20/20 hindsight I probably should'a made one normally to see the difference). I'm in love with Photoshop, too, but generally not to the extent that I'll totally change a picture. I spent too many years in film to do that much manipulation. I was trained to try to get it in camera. I find myself agreeing with many sometimes-intense critics of the Photoshop-the-bejeebers-out-of-it crowd. It begins to stop being photography. :)

I know I blew the composition because I didn't even see the kayaker at first. I was literally focused on the sunset, waiting for the "perfect" moment, and I was hand-holding so I was studying the shot on the screen when I caught movement out of the corner of my eye. I just had to squeeze it off before he was in an even worse position. I only yesterday figured out how to get the branches off the boat, but I rather like the jaggy shoreline look. I wouldn't remove the rest of the trees, nor would I crop the right-hand tree because I had already carefully considered the framing I wanted, with trees on left and right. What I hadn't considered was a serendipitous kayaker gliding into frame. :D :D :D
Thanks, ABC. I was playing with the "sunset&q... (show quote)


Hi Chuck. We are pretty much on the same page. My point with the white balance is get it "right" so you see what it was and then, if you wish, change it. I started working in the darkroom in 1959, first with black and white and then color. As a chemist, I miss the darkroom. As a photographer, I do not. Digital allows you to work a photo like you never could. Do not feel guilty about that or not capturing the "perfect" picture in the camera.

I did not look at your metadata but this shot is made for raw. It gives you so much more editing latitude.

Do not knock serendipity. How many photos owe their beauty or greatness to it?
Go to
Jan 8, 2014 10:07:33   #
I would remove the trees in front of the kayaker. Sky and reflection too bright and off-color for my taste. I would use an Expodisc to get the white balance correct. I would also make the kayaker a little lighter.

I wonder what the shot would look like with the trees cropped off from the right. The sun will probably be too close to the edge.

The interesting possibilities of the sky make up for less-than-compelling composition. The problem with pictures like this is that you do not have a lot of time to find the right place for an interesting composition. The kayaker is good but you see how little time you had to get him in the right position.
Go to
Jan 6, 2014 15:03:19   #
Nightski wrote:
I love this bird in the snow. I wish there was a way for you to use manual focus, because I know you would nail it then. You're so good with your flower & foliage images. Maybe you just need a dioptric adjustment.It is very difficult to use manual focus in the cold however. Borrow your husband's zippos. :-) Or is it because you can't hold the camera still? I can't. I have to use a tripod. I'm praying that you get a lens with IS. :-) It's amazing.


The image stabilization on my 18-200 walk-around is just about useless. However, my monopod does make a difference.
Go to
Jan 6, 2014 14:43:50   #
Country's Mama wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion but, there is actually no sky in this picture. It is all snow. At the top of the picture you can see the blurred fence that is in the background. I am afraid that a blue sky would look unnatural as it is snowing like crazy.


That never stopped me from dropping in a new background!
Go to
Jan 6, 2014 13:16:57   #
I dislike the exaggerated colors of the edit. I do like the clear, dark sky of the original and would fix two things in the picture.

As has been mentioned already, I would fixed those converging lines of the buildings. I do not like parallel lines that are not parallel. Just my taste. Then I would bring out some of the building detail. Not a lot because the drama of the picture for me is the bright sun and great sky. If you want to see the building detail, then go out there when the sun is elsewhere.
Go to
Jan 6, 2014 13:07:00   #
The big issue I have with the photo is the sky. The picture could have just as well have been in black and white. The foreground gets totally lost in the background. I stopped shooting snow and skies like this decades ago. Just my own taste.

However, this picture could be a lesson learned. How about changing the dull sky to blue? I would play with this but am not at my graphics computer. I would mask off the foreground and either replace the background or its color. The selection wand in PS/PSE may not work well because of the poor contrast between the foreground and background. However, you might find a channel that will work. Of course, refine edge may work.

The focus issue is another matter. Autofocus may not work well because the amount of contrasting material is so small. You might try manual focus and a depth of field table.

Good luck.
Go to
Jan 4, 2014 22:48:20   #
I hope these links work. All taken by Dorothea Lange. Nothing new under the sun.

http://www.shorpy.com/node/2499?size=_original#caption

http://www.ciudaddemujeres.com/mujeres/Fotografia/LangeDorothea1.jpg

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS_CKy1WEcIGdMvoDA0hGCF4UiON_s6z5-wjksea9B3kARM6di6

http://www.dptips-central.com/image-files/dorothea_lange.jpg
Go to
Jan 4, 2014 07:34:00   #
The picture reminds me of something Dorthea Lange did and the shutter is necessary. I like the unconventional framing with the large black space and putting the subject near the corner.

My big issue with the picture is the exaggerated contrast and sharpness. Neither looks real. I like the strong blacks and whites but I would like to see more mid-tones and less sharpness.
Go to
Jan 4, 2014 07:19:48   #
amehta wrote:
You can set your camera to make a new folder for each day you shoot. Then when you specify which folder you are importing, it's just dealing with pictures from that day, not stuff you've already taken care of.


This is one of the two solutions to problem. All you have to do is to remember to do it. Unfortunately, LR ignores the folders on the SD so you have to copy that folder to your computer and then import it into LR.

The second solution is that when the pictures on the SD appear on the import screen of LR, click "Uncheck all" beneath the main screen. Then, click on the photos you want to import. Make sure you sort the files by capture date or file name.

In any event, do not delete photos from the SD. I suggest using only two cards. When the first is full, use the second one. Once that is full and you need a new card, delete the first and use it. The reason is that you do not want to delete something accidentally that you may want later. Unless you have a compelling need, do not buy a third card because then you will want to buy even more and before you know it, you cannot find anything. And make sure you backup your computer daily.
Go to
Jan 3, 2014 15:53:14   #
MT Shooter wrote:
You must be talking about Digitalrev.com, they offer that service on all their lenses and bodies.


Indeed I am. What do you know about them?
Go to
Jan 3, 2014 14:34:57   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Sigma USA will service their grey market lenses, but not under warranty, you will be charged for the parts as well as the labor.


I am aware of that. However, the vendor in Hong Kong offers me the option of my returning the lens to it for service or paying to have it serviced in the US.
Go to
Jan 3, 2014 14:09:01   #
Mark7829 wrote:
Well that should be an indication. You will not know for sure until you actually need service.


You are absolutely correct. They can change their policy.
Go to
Jan 3, 2014 13:23:47   #
Mark7829 wrote:
If you buy from HKong, this could be problematic. For a Nikon lens, it is considered to be a grey market. Nikon in the USA will not service grey market items. All items at one point or another WILL NEED service. I would never buy offshore or ever by grey.


It is a Sigma lens and Sigma USA will service it. I called. However, one of their authorized repair centers will not. Go figure.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 ... 330 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.