Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: berchman
Page: <<prev 1 ... 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 next>>
Jun 30, 2012 09:07:54   #
I do mostly street and event shooting with some portraiture. I've been carrying a D700 with the 17-35 and a D300 with the 70-200, but my plan was to replace the D300 with another full frame. I have had a D800 on order since mid February. I would like to solicit your opinions as to whether I would be better off for my purposes with a D600 rather than the D800, given that my street shots are done very fast and require a camera that will focus fast and accurately and that some of the opinions I've read about the D800 is that it is very fussy about exact focus since it renders such detail.
Go to
Jun 21, 2012 14:02:08   #
glojo wrote:
With me I always tend to go for the cheapest cure and that is 'User error'

I am a terror for forgetting I touched something or adjusted something and sadly the time I find out I have done something wrong is when I look at the images I had shot :oops: :oops:

These cameras can be so complex if we want them to be, the options, the menus, the Banks we can select, it is all a minefield waiting for me to press just one single little icon.

Is it worth considering putting the camera back to the factory defaults?
With me I always tend to go for the cheapest cure ... (show quote)


Get Tom Hogan's book on the D300. He explains in incredible detail how everything works and suggests solutions.
http://www.bythom.com/nikond300guide.htm
Go to
Jun 21, 2012 08:23:07   #
When I'm carrying my Nikon D300 with the 70-200 f/2.8 lens and the Nikon D700 with the 17-35 f/2.8 I've been mistaken for a professional. After bypassing a number of shots in Central Park (NYC) because I didn't want to change lenses on the fly, I decided that two cameras was the solution. I always answer, "No, I'm just a hobbyist."
Go to
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jun 20, 2012 06:35:00   #
Patriot66 wrote:
Stef C wrote:
Patriot66 wrote:
nikon af-s dx nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6g ed vr ii Just bought this lens because was not getting "sharp" pics from my Tamron 70-300. Does anyone have this lens and have comments good or bad?? Would like to think I made a good choice - thanks for the input.


haha i feel like you should've asked for reviews before you bought it :).

It's a good lens, but with any superzoom you're going to be sacrificing one thing for convenience and that is image quality.

Check out reviews at photozone. Ken Rockwell loves it, but he's lazy and doesn't want to change lenses all of the time.

It's not going to be as sharp as a prime, or even a mid range telephoto, but you also shouldn't really ever have to change lenses.
quote=Patriot66 nikon af-s dx nikkor 18-200mm f/3... (show quote)


OK now I really feel like an idiot. Here is what I have: Kit 28-55 nikon, Zeiss 1.4 55 mm fixed, aforementioned 70-300mm Tamron (not thrilled with) and 200-500mm Tamron. Need something to fill the gap in the middle. I want a lens that will do wildlife (near), landscape and maybe a wide angle for group shots if needed. Looked at the site but that is complicated as well. ANY help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Rick
quote=Stef C quote=Patriot66 nikon af-s dx nikko... (show quote)


It all depends on how much money you have to spend. My first lens was the previous model of the 18-200. I wasn't happy with it. I bought the 70-200 f/2.8 and the 17-35 f/2.8 and I felt there was a big improvement. Get any of the Nikon FX pro lenses. The cheapest semi-pro which still is very good is the 24-120 f/4. I have it and like it a lot.
Go to
Jun 17, 2012 23:22:52   #
D0r1neK wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on a bag to put your camera and equipment in as not to draw attention that expensive equipment is in that bag.


I traveled through India, Vietnam and Bangkok with two big Nikons on either shoulder and never experienced any threat. I left other expensive equipment in my hotel room without a problem.
Go to
Jun 9, 2012 15:40:05   #
IvanF wrote:
Peter Hurley is the photographer's name. http://peterhurley.com/

He cuts the top of the head off to place the eyes approximately in the "rule of thirds" position and because he finds the the face/jaw line/neck area more expressive than whatever people do with their hair.

He shoots in the horizontal format because he likes a lot of negative space around his subject.

Just because this style works for him is not a reason for other people to copy it but they do. Go figure.

BTW, he give great workshops. If there is one in your area, do take it, but don't copy his style, copy his work ethic. He is quite extraordinary.

Peter Hurley is the photographer's name. http://pe... (show quote)


I PM'd you regarding Hurley.
Go to
Jun 9, 2012 06:32:41   #
pooterpa76 wrote:
for the life of me i can't remember the photographer's name but he was featured in an internet article recently & is supposed to be a highly respectable, well established name in headshot photography & he typically shoots headshots in horizontal format & commonly cuts off the top of the client's head. it's now like his trademark.
jimberton wrote:
i have seen these and used it a few times from client requests.....just looks like a crooked photo to me....

and another thing...this new trend in cropping off part of the top of the head on a portrait???????...............i have had 3 clients in the last week come to me to get portraits without the tops of their heads cropped..as they received from my competition....

seems like everything is trying to replace anything that is or was standard.

i sure don't mind change, but some of these "trends" are pretty lame....but it's up to the client.
i have seen these and used it a few times from cli... (show quote)
for the life of me i can't remember the photograph... (show quote)


Peter Hurley is the name of the guy and he is marketing a two day headshot intensive workshop for $1500.
Go to
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Jun 7, 2012 10:01:52   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Festina Lente wrote:
I have read on this site several references that Canon and Nikon do not recommed using the tripod mount to attach a camera strap. I have not been able to find any facts from Nikon or Canon to back that up.
But I did find the following link that, while not very scientific, seems to ease any worry one might have about using the tripod mount on the bottom of your DSLR to attach a shoulder camera strap.

Comments?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bUK7G5Gy5B4
I have read on this site several references that C... (show quote)

Like some other posters, I'm not too impressed by his demo. One thing the manufacturers mentioned in their responses was the jolting forces, as in dropping the camera a few feet and having the bolt take the stress.

Aside from the strength of the camera's tripod socket, what about the strength of that 1/4" bolt? A quick online search turned up lots of broken tripod mounting situations. Most involved the bolt breaking when the tripod fell over, but there were also cases of the threads being stripped. Below are some of the cases I found.

*Help!!! I had an accident with my tripod today. I was mounting my Nikon D300s onto a tripod with a ball head today. I didn't seem to be using much force, but the thread of the tripod just broke off in my hand. There is maybe a few mm of the thread sticking up out of my cameras mount socket, and it's stuck in tight. Does anyone have any ideas of how to get it out? Or any ideas of how much it might cost in a repair shop to get it removed?
*I'm not sure what happened but I found it on the floor with a broken tripod mount.
*Hey, so a few weeks ago I broke the bottom part of my camera off that allows it to connect to the tripod screw.
*My tripod fell, and the tripod mount of the camera was broken.
quote=Festina Lente I have read on this site seve... (show quote)


I don't understand this guy's problem with the ball head. I slide my D300 fitted with an L bracket on to the quick release of the ball head. The only thing going into the camera's tripod socket is the heavy duty allen screw of the L bracket.
Go to
Jun 7, 2012 08:29:03   #
If anyone is really worried about the tripod mount giving way when carrying a camera with a strap which attaches to the mount, I suggest getting an "L bracket" from ReallyRightStuff.com and attaching the carrying bolt to the spare hole on the L bracket. These brackets are expensive, but they look like they were made by a pre WWII German machinist.
Go to
Jun 7, 2012 06:41:35   #
dragonfist wrote:
I wonder if the concern might be more about the attachment screw on the tripod mount loosening and the camera taking a tumble? With all the jostling around a camera would take while walking about with it on the strap that would concern me more that the setup pulling apart. Vibration is great at loosening screws.


I regularly check that it is tight. It only takes a few seconds.
Go to
Jun 5, 2012 19:57:17   #
naturepics43 wrote:
berchman wrote:
naturepics43 wrote:
berchman wrote:
naturepics43 wrote:

Your "Quality" setting is set to "Basic". Try changing to "Fine". Also faster shutter speed will help.


How did you determine what the Quality setting was?


Looked on EXIF info.


I opened the photo in Adobe Bridge, and looked at all the metadata, but I could not find anything that identified the quality setting he used. Did you deduce it from the file size (1.48MB) or the dimensions 3216x2136)?
quote=naturepics43 quote=berchman quote=naturep... (show quote)


I have Opanda on my computer to open EXIF info. Under"MakerNote" the quality setting is the third item down.
quote=berchman quote=naturepics43 quote=berchma... (show quote)


Thanks. Looks like a useful piece of software.
Go to
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Jun 5, 2012 17:16:14   #
naturepics43 wrote:
berchman wrote:
naturepics43 wrote:

Your "Quality" setting is set to "Basic". Try changing to "Fine". Also faster shutter speed will help.


How did you determine what the Quality setting was?


Looked on EXIF info.


I opened the photo in Adobe Bridge, and looked at all the metadata, but I could not find anything that identified the quality setting he used. Did you deduce it from the file size (1.48MB) or the dimensions 3216x2136)?
Go to
Jun 5, 2012 09:51:10   #
naturepics43 wrote:

Your "Quality" setting is set to "Basic". Try changing to "Fine". Also faster shutter speed will help.


How did you determine what the Quality setting was?
Go to
Jun 5, 2012 09:20:46   #
I travel with a ThinkTank back pack filled with two cameras and three lenses, a flash, and an Epson P6000 viewer. At German airports (Berlin, Frankfurt) I am taken aside to a special room where my equipment is checked for residues. In the US it is never checked.
Go to
Jun 3, 2012 11:15:57   #
I have a CameraSlingers strap for carrying two cameras screwed into their tripod holes. I have carried a Nikon D300 with the Nikon 70-200 on one and a D700 with the Nikon 17-35 on the other with no problem. But as insurance, I use an Upstrap as a safety backup. I should also mention that the bolts are screwed into the hole in the ReallyRightStuff L bracket on each camera.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 next>>
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.