Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ssymeono
Page: <<prev 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 40 next>>
Jan 15, 2016 09:32:18   #
Your pictures are dramatic and look as though produced by a great painter. (Please adjust your horizon on #1!)
Sarantis
Go to
Jan 13, 2016 09:23:09   #
BBphotography wrote:
I am a newby to Photography, but highly dedicated, i will try to collect the appropriate gear, till then, i experiment on shooting with a Nikon D3100 and a 18-55 lens, i love the feeling i get while i play with my camera and i will never give up on this. Nice to be here, Greetings from sunny Greece!


Welcome to UHH from another Athenian living in the USA. When you select images, remember to click "store original" to the right of Browse so that we may enlarge your images. Best of luck! Here is an Athenian sunset shot just before the Olympic games of 2004.


(Download)
Go to
Jan 13, 2016 09:11:23   #
Many good suggestions have been made here already. Professional art historians introduce their students to art using textbooks by Janson (History of Art), Gardner and also Fleming. I would recommend studying one of the great masters of all time: Nicolas Poussin (1594-1665). Wikepedia offers a complete list of his paintings in color and it's free!
Go to
Jan 13, 2016 09:02:03   #
Remus wrote:
Here's a tip I was taught when shooting a rifle but it works equally well (for me anyway) when I need to hold a camera steady for a shot. It's all about how to hold your breath. Most people breathe in and then hold their breath while taking the shot. But this means you are putting your rib muscles under strain and could cause a bit of trembling. Try filling your lungs then breathing out about a third of the way, then stop breathing out while you take the shot. I find this useful for those times when a tripod/monopod isn't being used.
Here's a tip I was taught when shooting a rifle bu... (show quote)


Why not try the exercise invented by Italian opera singers who must produce a huge sound in order to sing over and above the orchestra (of course, without a mike). It takes 16 seconds and aims at relaxing tension: breathe in slowly through the nose while counting four seconds; hold in breath for another four seconds; exhale slowly through the mouth counting four seconds, and hold your breath for another four seconds. You may repeat the exercise two or three times. Then always perform or shoot the camera with your two feet planted firmly on the ground about one foot apart. This exercise is also recommended for public speakers.
Go to
Jan 10, 2016 11:26:45   #
markngolf wrote:
Forgot to add. According to the serial number, as far as I could ascertain, It is one of the earliest f5's produced. Notice the serial number ends in 002!!

Mark


You didn't show the front element which is flat, you showed the back. About the serial number: the lens you show is the second one made in 1961. I happen to have #171502, one of the last made in 1969.
Go to
Jan 6, 2016 09:46:06   #
camerapapi wrote:
This lens was introduced in 1959 with the original Nikon F. I am not sure if it was also available for their rangefinder cameras.

It had an original Gauss design and the optical formula was similar to that of the Zeiss Sonnar lens. If memory does not fail multicoating began in 1973.

This excellent portrait lens, available today at reasonable prices, especially those made with single coating like mine was one of the first lenses to bring professional reputation to Nikon optics. Another lens that was spectacular in the 70's was the 80-200 f4.5 a lens well known for its sharpness at all apertures. This specific lens changed the reputation at the time of zoom lenses.

These three images were made using the 105 f2.5 Nikkor P of the late 60's with a Nikon D610. They show its sharpness.
I have used other lenses for portraits but I always come back to this one. It built a reputation as one of the sharpest lenses made for portrait photography. I guess today, after more than 40 years it is still true.
This lens was introduced in 1959 with the original... (show quote)


I would be curious to know the distance of your subjects in these great images. According to published sources, the closest focus distance is 47" (as compared to the 16" of the 105 micro).
Go to
Dec 27, 2015 11:09:45   #
A close-up from an unusual series of images on frosted windows.
Sarantis


(Download)
Go to
Dec 26, 2015 10:51:55   #
burkphoto wrote:
10x life size and greater magnifications = micro. 1/10 to life size is close-up. 1x to 10x is macro... That's the way I learned it. Nikon wants to call their close-up lenses "micro", confusing everyone. I have two of them, anyway. Micro Nikkors? Meh...


Both terms ("macro-" and "micro-) derive from ancient Greek and unless used correctly, they are likely to cause confusion, like the one encountered here. "Macro" is the opposite of "micro". Macro designates something 'large' or 'long' or 'excessive', while micro means 'small' or 'minute'. After all, Nikon did its homework and named its lenses correctly. There already exist in all European languages terms like "microscopy", "microbe" and many others to describe the study of very small things or "macrocosm" (=the great world), "macrograph" (=a photograph equal to or larger than life) or "macroscopic" (=visible to the naked eye and opposite of microscopic) and many others.
It is hard to argue with long established uses of words but UHH may wish to establish a committee of experts to reconsider the use of words and suggest alternatives.
Sarantis
Go to
Dec 25, 2015 11:29:47   #
rmalarz wrote:
That's right. 44 years ago this evening. I've enjoyed every minute of those years together. The places we've gone, things we saw, and moments we captured. Treasures, every one of them.


A very sentimental journey! To think that you two have aged together for 44 years. It's even more interesting that you purchased one of the last models and that your journey could have been 56 years (the first year for the F). As it happens, 1971 was both the year you purchased your F and that its famous successor the F2 was introduced. By camera standards, you nostalgically purchased an antique and still lived with it for a veritable eon of 44 years.
CONGRATULATIONS!
Go to
Dec 21, 2015 09:13:01   #
Thank you all for your suggestions and helpful comments. I am already adjusting contrast. I am particularly glad to have posted these images for those of you who live in warm climates and have never seen frosted windows.
Sarantis
Go to
Dec 20, 2015 10:22:52   #
topcat wrote:
Remember the spring? I kinda miss it already.


Double thanks for this wonderful image: one for the shot, the other for this unique to California flower (only northern CA?). It is related to the lily family.
Go to
Dec 19, 2015 08:42:52   #


Florida remains a most beautiful state even when weird. Sadly, it would also be the first to experience the devastating effects of climate change. I just finished reading that in the city of Miami Beach the water level rises an inch a year and parts of it are already in danger of flooding (Elizabeth Colbert, "The Siege of Miami", The New Yorker, 12/21 & 28, 2015).
Go to
Dec 18, 2015 11:08:09   #
Here are the three images marked for download.
Sarantis


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Dec 18, 2015 10:30:35   #
I invite criticism and reactions to a series of photographs I have created every winter, when the temperature deeps to below 12F. There are a couple of windows in my attic/3rd floor that face north and west and have storm windows. Just before frost, I carefully clean all windows so that when condensation freezes up, I can photograph the icicles that form on the inside surface of the storm window. The compositions become denser and deeper as the temperature gets lower. I show here three images from January 2015, photographed with the D800E and the AF 60mm macro on a tripod and remote release. The files have been reduced from 103.4MP to 8.42MP. I need to photograph before or at sunrise, you will notice the background getting pink as the sun comes out and light is reflected from buildings.
Have you ever seen similar images? Is the subject interesting?
Thank you in advance,
Sarantis

Original surface approx. 2X3 in


Original surface approx 3X4 in.



Go to
Dec 15, 2015 11:08:39   #
RWR wrote:
In defense of Braczko, 232001 is stated as the first AIS serial number in the Nikon Compendium (English Edition, April, 1993, Appendix, Page 181), and also here:

http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html

(Who to believe - looks like you're outnumbered three to one!! :lol: :lol: )


I am sorry for the confusion, I thought we were talking about the 105mm f/2.8. There is no dispute about the serial numbers of the f/4 (I own #252612).
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 40 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.