Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Notorious T.O.D.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 279 next>>
Sep 23, 2017 13:34:40   #
I believe you can buy a Pit Pass at NASCAR races if you want to spend some more money... Once you are in the Pits well...
At even NHRA Drag Races every ticket is a Pit Pass and people are free to roam and spend time in the Pits all day if they want to do it.

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 23, 2017 12:31:31   #
Cell phones are used a lot today to live stream on Facebook...

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 23, 2017 12:17:47   #
Is it just me or does the bird photo seem to be very soft and perhaps missed focus?

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 23, 2017 10:45:02   #
Save them as Custom Shooting Settings in C1, C2 and if needed C3. I have a setting for indoors as C1 and outdoors as C2 on my Canon camera.

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 23, 2017 10:34:15   #
Architect1776 wrote:
Just a guess they each paid $1,000.00 to get those vests and be in a special location(s) allowing for a good point of view.



In todays world these organizations treat media very very well in general. They understand the value of the extra exposure, pun intended, and the coverage both live and in images of their events bring to them. Small local tracks are where I have run into more issues shooting than any large regional or national event. At smaller tracks there can be a photographer who feels they are the "Official" track photographer and that you shooting may be infringing on their status or business. i have had these people tell me I can only shoot this or that and where I can shoot from. I try to get along with them but I also feel I have been given certain rights to shoot by the track management or organization. Often it is easier to just get along with them than to make an issue of it. Sometimes it is easier to just move into the stands and shoot from there with a longer lens.

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 23, 2017 10:23:10   #
Most drag racing tracks that I have been to you can either get a more permanent credential with a lanyard or a vest of some sort that identifies you as media to their staff. Some organizations are much stricter, NHRA for example, and others enforce the rules more loosely. Ultimately I feel you are responsible for your well being and equipment well being and not interfering with the racing in any way. Some track and organizations allow the use of flash or strobes and others do not. Usually you have to sign a release and sometimes a set of rules to adhere to when receiving your credential. I have even had some tracks ask for copies of your photos that can get a little dicy. Usually an inquiry with the sanctioning organization and the track staff where you want to shoot will help you learn how to get access if you can. This should be done several weeks to several days in advance of any actual event. The staff is often too busy to deal with this stuff during race days unless you are already know to them. In drag racing the shooters are pretty well known to each other and often friends. So, you sort of have to accept that they are wondering what you are doing there in their world and if you have the common sense and manners to shoot with them. In time they can become friends too. But many of them are shooting to make a living or part of their living and some of us are out there shooting to promote the sport, but not for a living. Be respectful of those who are trying to make a buck. It can also be a very long and hot day or days at an event. Many tracks have media rooms with internet access, workspace, drinks, snacks and meals. In todays world many of these people are trying to get their photos processed and uploaded to websites as quickly as they can.

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 22, 2017 08:19:42   #
dyximan wrote:
Thank you
I know it will be difficult to understand both systems adequately in such a short period of time, However my goal is to shoot basically the same photo virtually simultaneously under the same conditions with similar focusing point snd auto focus and simply distinguish between the two to my satisfaction which is the quicker more accurate system for me. And which produces the quality of photo that is acceptable to me. As well as to better understand the people here on the hog. Aa so far as the majority I have spoken to here and elsewhere so far consider the Canon system to be simpler than that of the Nikon and I simply want to use both csmers and make my own determination.
Thank you br I know it will be difficult to unde... (show quote)


I think you will find the 7D2 and the D500 both produce images that are acceptable to you. So, I am not sure this will help you decide. A few years ago I was shopping for a camera and ended up comparing a 7D to a 1D MKIII as that was in the same budget used. I ended up with the 1D MKIII and was very happy with it. You may want to consider the 1Dx MKI as Gene suggested if you are thinking Canon. The lens selection will be a big factor too of course. You might also compare images on Flicker taken with the camera and lens combinations you are interested in looking at for your new camera. Good Luck.

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 21, 2017 08:18:57   #
Nikon must like to be low bidder on some Government and Commercial Contracts...LOL

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 20, 2017 15:43:54   #
The Watcher wrote:
I was at a backyard sale where a lady had lots of older photo gear for sale. None of which interested me. As I wander around to the other tables, I come across a lone Nikon SB800 flash that wasn’t priced. I tinkered with it for a while, noting the battery leakage. I hunted down the owner and ask about the flash. She looked it over and said.... this might be the one that I’ve had problems with. Then she up and said.... you just take it and if you can make it work, then good for you. Back home, I pulled the old batteries (Energizer) and cleaned the contacts with vinegar on a Q-tip. Installed new batteries and the unit fired right up and worked as it should. After some more cleaning and the removal of some sticky Velcro, the flash looks like new.

A flash in this condition, sells for around $250

I think she let the flash go because of the batteries.
I was at a backyard sale where a lady had lots of ... (show quote)


I think she let it go because of a lack of knowledge on her part.
But you got something that worked out for you and kept it out of the landfill!

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 20, 2017 15:30:54   #
The 100-400 II with 2.0 TC I,II or III is not listed as autofocusing in the list of autofocusing lenses at F8 in my 1Dx MkII manual. Only with the 1.4 I, II and III TC. So, you may want to verify that and if you go past F8 it will be manual focus only as I read it...

Best,
Todd Ferguson

robertjerl wrote:
It is a 2x. He used the 100-400 before that, with a 7DII. His body is I believe a 5Dsr now.

Most of the time my 100-400 II is on my 7DII and I also use the 1.4x III. The IQ is about the same as the Mark I version without extender, which I also used to use. When on my 6D it is of course without extender. One of the main reasons I am going to upgrade my FF body. Probably to a 6DII* but maybe a 5DIV if I can come up with the $$. Both those will AF at f/8.0, the 6DII with 27 focus points and the 5DIV all 61 will work.
It is a 2x. He used the 100-400 before that, with... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 20, 2017 09:20:29   #
foathog wrote:
Don't forget that it focuses as close as 3 ft! zoom in at 400mm and you practially have a macro lens.


According to the Canon specifications it has a .31x magnification.
That is far from a true Macro 1:1 magnification minimum.
You can by a Canon 100mm Macro lens for 1/3 or less than the price of the 100-400 II if you are looking for Macro.
I will agree that you can do as you say and crop greatly and get something interesting if you have the megapixels to crop.

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 20, 2017 07:28:21   #
Eneloops and don't look back. The ones I have can be recharged 500 and 1000 times. That is a lot of usage...

WD40 is mostly fish oil....

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 20, 2017 07:12:51   #
Check out Black Rock Photography on FB. My friend Tara shoots her 5D3 and the 100-400 II most of the time. She loves the lens...

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Sep 19, 2017 10:22:13   #
Bob, You made a good wise buy!

Best,
Todd Ferguson

rmalarz wrote:
Ironically, I purchased mine from a friend who decided he was going pure digital. "So, I don't need an external meter". Fine. I'll give you $250 for it. Sold. Downloaded the profiling software, did a few hours of work shooting a color chart, etc. and have been using it since. Travels with me and whichever camera I decide to take. Coupled with the Expodev program on my iPhone, I've nailed my exposure/processing quite well.
--Bob
Go to
Sep 19, 2017 09:16:12   #
Bob,

The 758 is a great meter. I have one but just last week received a new 858 from B&H. So, far I like it even more than the 758. I expect I will be selling my 758 before too long. I doubt I would reach for it much more with the 858 within reach even though it is a great meter. I think meters are still very useful tools. I wish more people saw it that way.

Best,
Todd Ferguson

rmalarz wrote:
Todd, I'm particularly fond of my Sekonic L758DR. I have profiles stored in that meter for both my D700 and D800. Along with those, I also have a profile for the film I use for my Hasselblad and 4x5. That gives me the best of both worlds.
--Bob
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 279 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.