Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: RogStrix
Nov 12, 2022 12:37:37 #
Fotoartist wrote:
Couldn't you get the same effect from being upside down?
This was your original comment, everything else followed on from that...
Nov 12, 2022 11:41:40 #
Fotoartist wrote:
And what suggests the motion there?
We were talking about whether the model was upside down or not...
Nov 12, 2022 10:59:31 #
Fotoartist wrote:
I'm not very observant. Please explain.
Try looking closer at the bottom half of the download...
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Nov 12, 2022 06:07:51 #
have you pre-drilled holes into the branches to hold peanuts as 'temptation' for the birds?
Nov 11, 2022 13:24:14 #
Fotoartist wrote:
In the download I now see the centrifugal movement in the fine strands of hair now.
Lol, there's much more obvious evidence...
Nov 11, 2022 10:47:50 #
Fotoartist wrote:
Couldn't you get the same effect from being upside down?
The evidence is in the picture that the model wasn't upside down...
Nov 9, 2022 13:41:39 #
watch dog?
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Nov 4, 2022 18:11:07 #
Perhaps add a periscope on the horizon above her knee, sort of watching you watching me...
Nov 4, 2022 08:44:14 #
anotherview wrote:
The principles of .....After all, a photograph must stand alone in its appeal to the eye and do so without words.
Excuse my snip.
In general I would agree with your statement, and the OP has invited comments about the photography so must expect replies like yours.
However, photography can be one person's interpretation of a scene and we need to try and understand what they are trying to convey.
The loneliness and isolation of the transgender model as they go through their metamorphosis are all demonstrated by these pictures, some more strikingly then others.
Just my personal opinion.
Nov 4, 2022 08:34:08 #
WirtzWorld wrote:
Sunrise, not sunset. And not a composite. It’s a single frame photograph enhanced with a single speed light. It was dawn and the background was brighter than the fore so I balanced the two and voila! this is the result. Nothing tricky or no crazy photoshop manipulation, just sometimes you have to out think nature. A very old and well worn trusted light meter is usually your best friend.
So a fill light which has created the shadows then?
Nov 4, 2022 08:01:38 #
lovely picture, but the lighting doesn't look right, so I'm guessing it's a very good composite, which IMO doesn't detract from the picture
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Nov 4, 2022 02:59:46 #
Is the photographer being expressive here. Whilst many would say there is too much empty space around the model, I wonder if this isn't deliberate on their behalf emphasising the loneliness of the model? Too often we like to pigeon hole our pictures in to certain narrow styles and think they should conform to photographic 'rules'. I think the photographer here is being sensitive to the model.
Nov 1, 2022 07:48:39 #
Jim Tonne wrote:
I have no objections ! I am using decades old image software and it in general does what I need so I have never bothered to get better software. Go for it, gents, let's see what you can do with this image. - JimT
Using different software, here's my best effort so far... (but still not happy with it)
Oct 31, 2022 14:12:21 #
dpullum wrote:
But... with the Topaz AI Trio the grain, noise, and low resolution can be made better than new.
I'd like to see the results of you doing that if Jim the OP doesn't object?
Oct 30, 2022 14:27:31 #
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.