Cany143 wrote:
Back --in the late '90's/early '00's-- when I did camera restorations/refurbs/customizations, I re-skinned lots and lots of cameras. While one of the 'usual' processes was to completely remove, restore, and re-glue the original skin, I likewise did plenty of complete re-skins, using 3rd party leathers of many types. At this point, I only have a handful of 'customizations' I'd done, and attached are a few examples of those (they're old photos, so please don't take them as anything other than what they are... I still have a few of the ones I'd refurbished, and I doubt that there'd be any use in posting better, more recent, shots, ).
I have no knowledge of what 'skin' is presently on your SONY, how it might be attached, or what processes it would take to properly remove, prepare the camera body, or re-attach some sort of aftermarket 're-skin'. Generally speaking, 3M products tend to be very good --adhesive-wise-- but the 'skin' itself might be fairly generic, and would be no more scuff or damage resistant than the skin that came on your camera. A 'customization', on the other hand, would be an entirely different matter. The rangefinder Kiev shown in image #2 is still pristine, and I DID use the camera extensively for a number of years.
Ultimately, for the purpose you stated, there is no reason to re-skin your camera. If, on the other hand, you wanted to make your Sony a 'one of a kind' sort of beauty, then sure, go for it.
Back --in the late '90's/early '00's-- when I did ... (
show quote)
I may not have been clear...I am just looking to keep my camera from getting unnecessary dings, if possible. As I use it everyday, I heard of the 3M skins and thought it might be a good way to keep it clean. I appreciate your thoughts.