Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: nadelewitz
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 134 next>>
Apr 29, 2020 13:13:41   #
happy sailor wrote:
Canon AF LED Window for Canon Speedlite 430EX / 430EX II Flash CY2-1601-000. $21.99 on eBay or

this link. https://uscamera.com/product/canon-speedlite-430ex-430ex-ii-af-led-window-cy2-1601/ part listed at $14.81


Well worth the cost. This flash is worth $100-150 or more used.
Go to
Apr 29, 2020 13:10:58   #
Quinn 4 wrote:
I need help: How do I get pictures from a CD to a computer. Answer in plain English, not computer English if you could. Pictures of what I have to do would be of great help. I have a HP Slim Desktop 260-a010 with Windows 10. That all I known.


A little basic instruction on file management....moving files, copying files, creating folders to organize etc.....would do you well. Getting files from a CD is no different than getting them from a camera, flash drive, external hard drive or other storage. Moving/copying files from computer to another medium is how you SAVE and BACKUP data.

If you don't know how to do this simple stuff, you are missing the whole idea of a computer. Find someone to show you this.
Go to
Apr 29, 2020 13:05:10   #
Look it up on eBay to see if any of these are selling and have actually sold. "Sold" prices give an idea what it's worth.
Go to
Apr 29, 2020 13:02:17   #
bkyser wrote:
I'm not really a computer guy, but trying to learn. I really want to build my own photo editing computer. Not necessarily to save money, just because I like the pride of learning something new, and having it work (hopefully)

I have read several posts telling people to disable the ability of Photoshop to use the graphics card. If this is the case, would it make more sense to spend the extra money one would have spent on a graphics card, to boost the ram even more? I get that for gaming and for video editing, that you pretty much HAVE to install a graphics card.

Which speeds up a photo editing computer more, extra RAM or a graphics card?

I'm planning on using a "Ryzen 5" processor if that helps.

Thanks
bk
I'm not really a computer guy, but trying to learn... (show quote)


A little confused.
If your motherboard has onboard graphics or the CPU has graphics built-in, and you ADD a graphics card for better graphics capability, you would disable the ONBOARD graphics. You would do that in the BIOS configuration. If, that is, adding a graphics card doesn't automatically disable/override the onboard graphics.

You presumably would have no reason to use onboard graphics if you are adding a card.
Go to
Apr 29, 2020 12:52:20   #
seagull5 wrote:
I have been running around in my mind. A back up camera. I go over the spechs over again and wanting the same speech's. I have found the RX10M4 to give me alot more than I ask and it gifts me well. I have been on the phone with B and M, Canon Tech. Sony tech. Any good suggesation to where I can go. I realize that This is expensive I have given it too much thought.. The RX has been great...I couldn`t ask for more,,,Maybe a short yes or no and a short explination...This may be a foolish question....but It I don`t ask I may not get assistance. Thank you I will try to not feel foolish
I have been running around in my mind. A back up c... (show quote)


No.

If I had any idea what you are talking about I could give it more thought.
Go to
Apr 28, 2020 12:17:56   #
Could it have been a viewer for Minox film?
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 23:15:46   #
frankraney wrote:
In my opinion you are only partially correct. if the RAID controller is in the raid, then that raid can be moved from computer to computer. If the raid is set up as redundant or backup then the drive can be moved to another computer and read. This would be a raid 1. Each disc is a mirror of the first one in a raid 1.this is done but writing to all disk at the same time with the same data.

In a RAID 0 the data is split up between all the disks and is used for faster reads and wrights, no mirroring is done. If one drive fails you lose some of your data. but if you have a raid array of four drives that equals say one terabyte you can back that raid up to another drive with software, then you haven't read for fast read write and a backup.

As far as backing up goes you're correct. When you backup or copy a disc to another one you copy the viruses and everything, thus the need for continuous virus protection on the system.

At least that's the way I understand it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels#RAID_1
In my opinion you are only partially correct. if t... (show quote)


Begging your pardon, but your "opinion" is confused or lacking in awareness. Do some damned research in the Internet, will you?

1. A RAID array is setup by a controller, either in hardware (on the motherboard) or a software controller. A RAID drive could be read by an IDENTICAL controller on another computer. The controller is what formats the drives in a RAID array, ANY RAID array. Whether it is RAID 0, 1, 2, 3, whatever. Most often the drives are a PROPRIETARY format of that RAID controller, and ARE JUST NOT READABLE BY A DIFFERENT CONTROLLER.

2. What do you mean "If the RAID is set up as redundant or backup"? ALL RAID IS REDUNDANT. That's what the "R" stands for. Do you know what that means?
It means that multiple drives are being used to hold the data, in different ways on different RAID methods, with all of them appearing as one drive to the computer operating system.
If one drive fails in a RAID array, it can be replaced, and the controller reconstructs the drive to take its place in the array.

The drives in all RAIDS except 1 are not identical. No single drive contains all the data. Mirroring (RAID 1) makes all the drives identical, with all the data on each one.
But these identical mirrors should not be thought of as "backups" in the sense that they cannot be individually read out of the array they were created in.

On that note, I am done banging my head against the wall with folks who don't understand and don't want to. "Opinions" are irrelevant. We are talking about how it all FUNCTIONS, not what you WANT it to be.

Over and out!
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 19:06:16   #
Dikdik wrote:
I use a program called freefilesync and have for several years. Great for backups of only files that have changed.

Dik


So do I. Sync programs MAINTAIN a backup by adding new files, updating changed files and deleting files on the backup.
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 18:50:45   #
rck281 wrote:
I give up. You have outlasted me and, I suspect everyone else. I don't have any more time to waste today.


I guess knowledge and common sense win out. Bye.
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 18:24:08   #
DirtFarmer wrote:
The difference is in the last line:
"It's probably OK to back things up on media that may not be safe for long term storage. However, safety requires multiple copies in either case."


That's not MY line. You're talking to someone else.
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 18:20:11   #
rck281 wrote:
I agree with you. The only difference is that a backup program can create backups on what ever schedule you set and they are retained at what ever interval you choose. But yes, every backup of a defective drive or virus infected drive will duplicate that condition.


Your "difference" is exactly what I said. Give up the argument, please.
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 18:18:45   #
DirtFarmer wrote:
IMHO there's a difference between backing up and archiving.

Backing up is making copies of files that you will be using again sometime soon.

Archiving is making copies of files that you don't think you will be using in the immediate future, but may well want to reuse them a little later than soon.

Backing up is for the short term. Archiving is for the long term.

It's probably OK to back things up on media that may not be safe for long term storage. However, safety requires multiple copies in either case.
IMHO there's a difference between backing up and a... (show quote)


So what's the difference? Short-time backup, long-term backup (archiving), it's still a backup.
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 18:04:13   #
rck281 wrote:
BACKING UP means making a copy of a drive's contents onto another drive with a sync program, ....

I agreed with everything you said until recommending a sync program for backup. A sync program will replicate a virus, accidental erasure, etc to the targeted drive. A proper backup is done with a backup program such as the Windows 7 built into Windows 10, Acronis, EaseUS To Do Backup, etc. These allow you to keep multiple backups and an image of a drive.[/quote]

A sync program is just a way of automating doing a backup. Any of those backup programs will backup a defective drive as nicely as a good drive.

Making an image of a drive that is defective will produce a defective new drive.

By "the Windows 7 built into Windows 10", I presume you mean using "Backup & Restore (Windows 7)" utility to create a system image. Same idea as using EaseUS, Acronis, Ghost, AOMEI Backup or others to create a restorable image.
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 17:43:49   #
rochephoto wrote:
PS - I have all my critical data backed up on mirrored on duplicate LaCie Raid5 network storage devices. One is at my studio/business and 1 is at my house. I figure I can't more secure than that. I'd use the cloud but my files are too numerous and too large.


At the risk of opening a can of worms again on UHH.....

RAID is not backup. Mirror drives are not the same as making copies of a drive.

Reasons:
1. A RAID drive is most commonly NOT readable outside its RAID array. The RAID controller typically creates proprietary-format drives that are only readable in the RAID array they were
created by. There ARE exceptions to this, but you cannot know unless you take a drive from your RAID array and connect it via USB to a computer and (try to) read it. Please don't argue with ME. A little cursory research on the Web will find many discussions of this. I thought RAID mirroring was the way to go with my NAS, until I had to read one of the mirrors separately and could not, in Windows, Linux, Mac operating systems. The drive was NOT a recognizable format.

2. If there is a drive error (it's starting to fail for example), accidental/mistaken deletion, a virus or other data-related issue, the effects/problems are instantly replicated to the second (third, fourth...) drive instantly. So you have defective mirrors. Not exactly what you want, is it?

BACKING UP means making a copy of a drive's contents onto another drive with a sync program, or manually. This way, you decide when to do the backing-up, knowing FIRST that the data drive is good.

What you are doing is NOT protecting your critical data.
Go to
Apr 27, 2020 17:25:55   #
hj wrote:
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I have always understood that the terms flash drive and thumb drives are the same. Are you confusing terms or am I confused? Perhaps someone else will comment. If a flash drive is the same as a thumb drive per the definition shown, then 2 TB and up are NOT common. Most seem to be in the 16 gb to 64 gb range.


Flash drive and thumb drive are two names for the same thing. There are others.....USB stick is one.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 134 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.