Now this is really gorgeous......
A little too raunchy for my tastes and that pose is, well, a bit strange. Some of the best submissions in this section follow the dictum "Less is More." A little "mystery" always adds to the appeal. Sorry, I didn't see your other shot.
As spectacular as that video is, nothing quite matches experiencing that type of weather in person!
Toby wrote:
Thanks for this post. Something like this from one experienced was needed to put things in perspective.
I appreciate it..not to criticize other respondents, but you really can't judge its effectiveness on the basis of one or two experiences or simply practicing on mannequin. I would gestimate that in 40 years, I have used CPR well over 10,000 times. Patients needing CPR because of a cardiac rhythm disturbance generally do better than those with structural damage but the latter do survive as well
jerryc41 wrote:
I've taken several CPR courses, and the instructors said that it seldom works. Kind of ironic.
Well if they believe that, they shouldn't be teaching CPR
Well, having worked as a critical care nurse practitioner for almost 40 years, I would take issue with this.... I have resuscitated many people over the years and the majority of them survived using CPR...frequently we use this to support the patient until we can get a defibrillator if the issue is a rhythm problem. Now, out of hospital cardiac arrest is a different issue, primarily because it frequently occurs in a setting where bystanders are not trained in CPR. We say "time is muscle." meaning the longer they are down without support, the poorer the outcome; however, if rapid intervention is near, perhaps in the form of a first responder, survival rates are improved. Admittedly, this is horrible thing to go through,......occasionally, ribs are broken, regardless of how carefully it is done. Virtually all of these patients are unconscious during the event. But, I would also say that the majority have told me they would put up with a sore chest to be able to go on living,
Personally not a fan of extensively inked women but if gives them enjoyment, that's great.
DRam11 wrote:
Agree. Someone should give that coach a talking to. The girl is 15 - give her a break and some comfort, not a scolding.
That coach needs more than a talking to.....she should be banned.....period!
RainierView wrote:
We appreciate the help in the past identifying other items we have collected. Another item we've had in our vintage kitchen collection for many decades, looks like some sort of gadget for maybe whipping something up, but not sure exactly what it was used for. Has anyone ever used one, or know what this was for?
The last photo is of the Bakers Rack (in our antique and bar room) my wife set up where its displayed.
Its a food dicer....Used to advertise these on TV constantly every weekend...
I used to work in a hospital Emergency Department when a man came in with a bee in his ear. He wasn't stung but when that thing started buzzing, it literally thew him off his feet. We used alcohol here as well.....
He really didn't seem like he was interested in posting the quality edits that I see for the most part in this section. Hairy crotches seemed to be the focus in many of his shots, rather than the entire model; we're well rid of him
Hit return to digest...should take you back to the last place you were
I read that Youtube and Roku are feuding over money...that might be one of the issues
You'll get all of that in Boston and 20 miles in any direction from there