Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: DoyleY
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14 next>>
Mar 16, 2023 12:51:28   #
psievers wrote:
Hi,

I have an Epson 8850 and love it. Requires very little maintenance and head cleaning and makes beautiful 13 x 19 prints.


How long have you had it? Have you had any trouble with overspray? Do you use borderless printing?
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 11:43:43   #
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
Epson tried to tell me you have to use Epson paper at twice the cost and I said nothing in your literature does it say that.
There new solution to overspray is to clean the plastic on pads after making a print. This model has some issues for sure but the eco tank and larger size prints are a plus. The overspray was on the plastic pieces on pad as seen in photos, just puddles of ink that must be blotted up with a q tip.
I think the print quality was excellent


Thanks, I might could live with a small border on the print if it will eliminate the problem with overspray. Say making a 12.5"x18.5" print.
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 11:10:25   #
yssirk123 wrote:
If you can stretch your budget a bit I would look into the Canon Pro-1000. It has phenomenal print quality and uses pigment ink. The larger ink cartridges also lower the cost per print. Highly recommend.


Hmm, 80ml cartridges is a plus. Thank you. It is looking attractive at the moment. I do like Canon products and have little or no experience with Epson that I recall.
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 10:33:46   #
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
I bought the 8550 in June and so far I'm on my 5th, yes 5th, machine due to ink smears on print. Someone suggested a small white border and that cuts down on over spray. I like birderless better but I can't deal with stray ink. The over spray caused puddles if ink when I did 11 x 14 borderless. Print quality was great. I needed a printer and copy, scan so I bout this one. You might consider a different printer if you have the copy, scan covered.
I also bought it when price jumped from 699 to 799 and was backorder. A month after I bought it price went back down to 699 and Epson said too bad. I would gave taken a pack of paper as a goodwill jester but no go.
I'm out of time so I'll come back later.
I bought the 8550 in June and so far I'm on my 5th... (show quote)


Thank you, this is similar to some of the complaints I have heard from other 8550 owners. Why have borderless printing if you really can't use it? This is helpful as I really only considered the 8550 because of the tank feature.
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 10:21:52   #
cjc2 wrote:
IMHO, either purchase a printer made for photo prints (such as the Epson P700 or P900) or get your prints made from an outside source. There is no tank type printer made for consumers that will produce good photo prints. The ink use, and cost, of the P900 is much less than the P700. Non-OEM inks are total garbage and a waste of money. Again, if that's what you intend to due, get your prints made by a lab as there plenty of good ones. YMMV. Best of lick.


I see what you are saying about the cost of ink for the P-700 vs the P-900. With ink for the P-900 almost just half as much as ink for the P-700. I wonder what the deal with that is?
That is something to consider. Do you have experience with the P-900?
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 10:10:03   #
burkphoto wrote:
The Canon Pro 100 was a gem of a printer for enthusiasts. It has been replaced by the Canon Pro 200, which seems to be a worthy replacement.


Thanks.
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 10:07:18   #
burkphoto wrote:
The 8550 seems to be fine, so long as you DO NOT PRINT BORDERLESS. Some users report that the printer just cannot handle the over-spray of ink that it produces when printing off the edges of the paper. It is advertised as capable of borderless printing, but the ink-absorbing pads very quickly become saturated with ink, and transfer that ink to subsequent prints when the transport rollers get ink on them.

When I worked in a lab, we made borderless prints on our inkjet printers by using paper larger than the image area, and trimming each print down to size. We had no interest in ruining a perfectly good printer with over-sprayed ink. Making a 12x18-inch print on 13x19-inch paper is a prudent practice. Making an 8x10-inch print on 8.5x11-inch paper is also prudent. Yes, you may have to trim the excess. Many people just use a larger frame and a beveled mat.
The 8550 seems to be fine, so long as you DO NOT P... (show quote)


Trimming would seem to be the wise a prudent thing to do. Thanks for your input.
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 09:56:53   #
Cragzop wrote:
Of course. My bad.
It still prints magnificent photos.
Good luck with whatever you choose!


A cartridge type isn't out of the question. The ink compared to pigment is still cheaper. I liked my Pro-100 but it seemed like everytime I turned around I was having to order ink.
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 09:25:40   #
Cragzop wrote:
I purchased the Canon Pixma Pro 200 about a month ago. It prints magnificent photos up to 13x19.
It uses 8 pigment cartridges. I just bought a set of 8 from B&H for about $105. Individual cartridges are about $14.
I also considered the 8550, but when I compared photographs, the Pro 200 looked better.
The printer lists for about $600.
You can also download Canon’s Print and Layout software, which interfaces with my Photoshop Elements, and other editing software.


Thanks, that is one to consider but according to Canon it uses dye based ink. I would like to get away from cartridges if I go with dye base.
Go to
Mar 16, 2023 09:23:34   #
yssirk123 wrote:
If you can stretch your budget a bit I would look into the Canon Pro-1000. It has phenomenal print quality and uses pigment ink. The larger ink cartridges also lower the cost per print. Highly recommend.


Thanks, I will check it out.
Go to
Mar 15, 2023 13:36:44   #
bob fleer wrote:
I had purchased when the supply chain opened up one and enjoy it. No cartridges is a blessing. the prints are good and and respond well to my Lightroom Classic program. Setup was easy and having the front screen on the printer sure helps. Two things about printing 19" the feed is on the back for that size and I would not print borderless it uses more ink and excess will spill over the the pads what will catch the excess.


Thank you.
Go to
Mar 15, 2023 13:21:09   #
bsprague wrote:
This is almost more of an ethical dilemma than technical. If you selling prints, longevity is important. Using Canon's suggestions, pigment ink lasts around three times longer than dye ink. I think there are only two choices in the 13 x 19 size! Both use cartridges.

If you sell prints from the dye ink Epson 8550, are you obliged to tell the customer that the prints have a shorter than optimal life?


Maybe so, as well as not to place in a well lit area such as direct sun etc. My thinking too.
Go to
Mar 15, 2023 12:11:34   #
Ok Hoggers, I'm not a pro but I have sold a few prints. I'm currently without a large format printer and would like to get a new one. I would like one that will print up to 13"x19". Of course larger would be ok too depending on operating cost. The last large format printer I had was the Pixma Pro 100. I don't really want to go back to a cartridge type and would rather go with a tank type ink system. I have been looking at the Epson 8550 and it interest me but I have heard a few mention having trouble with it. Do any of you have experience with it?
I'm not a cheapskate but I'm not loaded either so I would like to keep the cost around a thousand bucks or so.
I have looked at pigment type and dye type and while I would rather go with pigment I don't believe the cost of ink for a pigment printer is practical for me. If someone can educate me more on that I would appreciate it. In fairness to any prospective buyer I do think about the longevity of pigment vs dye.
This printer would be dedicated for photo printing alone as I have printers for other printing needs.
I know it is ultimately my decision but I would greatly appreciate any helpful input.
Go to
Mar 12, 2023 09:33:12   #
I have no problem buying used. I just bought a D850, 200-500, 24-70 2.8, and a 70-200 2.8 all in excellent condition. The lenses were less than half what they would have been new.
Go to
Mar 8, 2023 16:10:30   #
rlv567 wrote:
That's the way to do it!

Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City


Thank you. This will be a new computer. I'm weighing whether to opt for 10 or 11. I should have made myself more clear.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.