AirWalter wrote:
If they could just figure out a way to remove the lunacy that causes a person to want to harm another person, the problem wouldn't be there. But no one talks much about that because it is easier to talk about taking someone's rights away because some lunatic decides to k**l or harm someone with his choice of a weapon.
Why does this country have more lunacy than other civilized countries?
Jim70 wrote:
It's not true that the West was doing nothing.....the Congress was all tied up with impeachment and everybody else was engrossed in the Harry and Megan split from the Royal Family. And if that wasn't enough, 2000 Democrats were trying to become President (so they could get their very own impeachment trial).
Fortunately, the news media was on the case …..wait, maybe not!
Never mind....
https://thebulwark.com/the-ten-weeks-that-lost-the-war/
5dogsken wrote:
Must be a lot of ill willed citizens in this land compared to other other civilized countries. The question is: Why?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26551975/
quixdraw wrote:
And enough good, I suppose you could have learned German, Japanese, or Russian and managed to survive. The implement is harmless by itself, it takes a person of good or ill will to activate.
Must be a lot of ill willed citizens in this land compared to other other civilized countries. The question is: Why?
clint f. wrote:
So the guy who helped Our country by reducing unemployment to the lowest rate in over 50 years and saw the stock market rise to the highest level in history and you can’t find a single positive story anywhere. Can’t concede a single action in a positive light. Nothin personal but “you are what you eat.” I’m guessing you will be v****g for Joe, and that’s fine but after 50 years in the swamp he’s gonna fix it all now? We are probably both reasonable people, might even enjoy each other’s company, but will never agree on this.
So the guy who helped Our country by reducing unem... (
show quote)
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1VFKB_enUS696US696&sxsrf=ALeKk03spMD3jp1ky50-IQWbnm_oMgXYdA:1589655327701&q=world+leader+approval+ratings+2019&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiCsP3Ih7npAhUQLa0KHfhTDGMQ1QIoBXoECAsQBg&biw=1600&bih=757
Well, at least we agree on SOMETHING. That's a start. ENJOY! Life IS short. Wink of an eye and it's GONE! Wish you peace.
David Martin wrote:
Nor any neutral stories, for that matter.
Remember back in the day when the news reported things in a neutral fashion?
And that in itself casts suspicion.
Not necessarily true :
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
But remember bias and factuality are are not the same thing.
https://www.google.com/search?q=most+factual+news+sources+2020&rlz=1C1VFKB_enUS696US696&oq=most+factual+news+sources&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l2.16092j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Most sheeple feel more comfortable reading things that align with what they already believe.
Also remember there's a WHOLE WORLD of media out there besides what's published in this country.
If you read enough you'll understand why trumpfans are SO defensive of their position. It literally IS them against the whole rest of the world.
Notice he attacked the source---with a lie no less--and TOTALLY ignored the content.
These folks have no intention of letting facts and reality intrude on the little world fuxsnooze has created for them. ENJOY!!
clint f. wrote:
Oh please. They are maintaining the President told people to inject disinfectant. We all know that is not true. In my book that disqualifies them as partisan. Show me a single positive story about our president and I may change that opinion.
Re: "We all know that's not true":
https://www.google.com/search?q=did+trump+suggest+injecting+bleach&rlz=1C1VFKB_enUS696US696&oq=did+trump+suggest+injecting+bleach&aqs=chrome..69i57.22870j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
It's VERY hard to to find ANY positive stories about him ANYWHERE. Except fuxsnooze and {gr}oan.
clint f. wrote:
I wonder how this would be different without the constant barrage of negative news from the MSM and press. Even stories that are ludicrous are beat to death and sold as t***h. One must also wonder if the disapproval in the UN and NATO countries is because he asked them to pay their share of the defense of their countries. I don’t think of it as a popularity contest, but wonder how that opinion has changed in China over the last few months. Finally, I think his approval rating is going to go down among the domestic “security apparatus” as the lawyers start indicting the deep state players.
I wonder how this would be different without the c... (
show quote)
You may be right. But then again:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/15/donald-trump-c****av***s-response-world-leaders
clint f. wrote:
Your next move is to claim 18,000 lies. Then Russian conspiracy in plain sight and quid pro quo or maybe hair color or his wife and kids. Thank me, I made it easier for you.
He doesn't need your help. The whole world's got his back:
https://www.google.com/search?q=what+the+world+thinks+of+trump&rlz=1C1VFKB_enUS696US696&oq=what+the+world+thinks+of+trump&aqs=chrome..69i57.19040j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
scallihan wrote:
Trump lost all credibility when he mentioned maybe injecting disinfectants would work. He tried to back pedal and say he was just baiting the press, but he's not that good an actor. I saw that interview, and he was serious.
https://www.alternet.org/2020/04/heres-why-people-stick-with-trump-and-fox-news-even-when-their-lies-k**l/
robertjerl wrote:
Some in the US are. But pretty much only Fox interviews or reports on them.
The others slam it because President Trump was mentioning it. Some in the media, and others - including "scientists" and "medical people" who don't like President Trump seem incapable of giving him credit for anything good.
Some of them are so bad about it that if President Trump said "poverty is bad for people" they would start gathering arguments to show that poverty is a wonderful and good experience. But not for them, for other people.
Some in the US are. But pretty much only Fox inte... (
show quote)
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1VFKB_enUS696US696&sxsrf=ALeKk01vqBPVzCx4vS2pyM5MTlxT58e7lA%3A1589643156276&lei=lAfAXpyXEIjKswW-uprgDQ&q=fox%20news%20misinformed&ved=2ahUKEwjBq4Se2rjpAhVESq0KHcuHB38QsKwBKAV6BAgAEAY&biw=1600&bih=757
phlash46 wrote:
No he's not. He has, at least, a checkered history. You have the typical Trumpian disregard for real science.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/15/c****av***s-death-toll-right-denies-figures
cinderbomb wrote:
Thank you patriot!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/15/donald-trump-c****av***s-response-world-leaders
robertjerl wrote:
Some in the US are. But pretty much only Fox interviews or reports on them.
The others slam it because President Trump was mentioning it. Some in the media, and others - including "scientists" and "medical people" who don't like President Trump seem incapable of giving him credit for anything good.
Some of them are so bad about it that if President Trump said "poverty is bad for people" they would start gathering arguments to show that poverty is a wonderful and good experience. But not for them, for other people.
Some in the US are. But pretty much only Fox inte... (
show quote)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/05/15/lancet-editorial-trump-administration-c****av***s-response/
Architect1776 wrote:
What does this stupid link have to do with anythin.
Really stupid.
Shouldn't you be screaming"f**e news"? The article merely exposes you to a realty that fuxsnooze hides from you. You wrote: "They are getting the t***h out...". So please, enlighten us and point out ANY unt***hs in that Lancet article. If you can't do that just go quietly into the night. Otherwise, your a hypocrite. Before you respond, type" fox viewer ignorance" into your search engine.