Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PhotoTex
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Mar 19, 2013 15:12:52   #
Hal81 wrote:
If your talking about an old box camera from the 30s the film was 25 asa spring loaded shuter, no adjustment. Some had a sliding hole behind the lens so you could change apature. They came in differant sizes that took differant size film. Before that it was the pin hole cameras. Had no lens at all.


This camera says Kodak and has a date on it of 1915. The shutter is spring loaded and there appears to be some kind of one single lens. I have another camera from the same era that is similar, but has an adjustment on the side that I assume changes exposure some way. I will have to look to see if it changes the size of the hole. Thanks for the info.
PhotoTex
Go to
Mar 18, 2013 16:27:26   #
Brian in Whitby wrote:
620 film is a Kodak version of 120 film. The only difference is the size of the hole in the end of the metal spool. I believe the 620 spool has a smaller hole. I seems to have been an effort by Kodak to force Kodak camera users to buy Kodak film.
Some cameras are able to use either size of film.

I seem to remember the colour film had an ASA (ISO) of 80. I think the B&W film was faster, probably 125. If you are shooting negative film there is probably a fair amount of latitude in the exposure that can be adjusted in printing.
620 film is a Kodak version of 120 film. The only ... (show quote)


Thanks for the info Brian.
Photo Tex
Go to
Mar 18, 2013 16:26:52   #
Brian in Whitby wrote:
620 film is a Kodak version of 120 film. The only difference is the size of the hole in the end of the metal spool. I believe the 620 spool has a smaller hole. I seems to have been an effort by Kodak to force Kodak camera users to buy Kodak film.
Some cameras are able to use either size of film.

I seem to remember the colour film had an ASA (ISO) of 80. I think the B&W film was faster, probably 125. If you are shooting negative film there is probably a fair amount of latitude in the exposure that can be adjusted in printing.
620 film is a Kodak version of 120 film. The only ... (show quote)


Thanks for the info Brian.
Photo Tex
Go to
Mar 18, 2013 15:26:32   #
kitcar wrote:
PhotoTex wrote:
I have a 1915 Kodak box camera and I would like to take some pictures to see how well these early cameras worked. But I have no idea what speed film to buy. Does anyone have some ideas on this?
Photo Tex


Being one of the oldies I like others I have run the whole gambit of cameras. Re' your question to 400ASA. with the Brownie, you have no control (basically) over aperture or shutter speed but it will be OK if the light reading is low (overcast), but knowing the work of a lot of processing houses you will still be pleased with the results. Kitcar

Kitcar
This is going to be fun!
Photo Tex
Further to my previose opinion to your question, what results can be attained with the Kodak Brownie?
Years ago I used to go to an international photographic exibition in Birkenhead UK with top awards. In the portrait section quite a few of us used to search out a regular photographer who year after year had a portrait hung (an achievment in itself) with the camera details "Kodak Brownie". I can't imagine he didn't have a top range camera of the day, but the challenge was the Kodak Brownie.The photograpger had an ARPS after his name, so knowing the shutter speed/ lens aperture & setting up his lighting to suit , his results were print any body would be thrilled with. So Photo Tex push that Kodak Brownie to its limits. Kitcar
quote=PhotoTex I have a 1915 Kodak box camera and... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 18, 2013 15:25:32   #
kitcar wrote:
PhotoTex wrote:
I have a 1915 Kodak box camera and I would like to take some pictures to see how well these early cameras worked. But I have no idea what speed film to buy. Does anyone have some ideas on this?
Photo Tex


Being one of the oldies I like others I have run the whole gambit of cameras. Re' your question to 400ASA. with the Brownie, you have no control (basically) over aperture or shutter speed but it will be OK if the light reading is low (overcast), but knowing the work of a lot of processing houses you will still be pleased with the results. Kitcar

Kitcar
This is going to be fun!
Photo Tex
Further to my previose opinion to your question, what results can be attained with the Kodak Brownie?
Years ago I used to go to an international photographic exibition in Birkenhead UK with top awards. In the portrait section quite a few of us used to search out a regular photographer who year after year had a portrait hung (an achievment in itself) with the camera details "Kodak Brownie". I can't imagine he didn't have a top range camera of the day, but the challenge was the Kodak Brownie.The photograpger had an ARPS after his name, so knowing the shutter speed/ lens aperture & setting up his lighting to suit , his results were print any body would be thrilled with. So Photo Tex push that Kodak Brownie to its limits. Kitcar
quote=PhotoTex I have a 1915 Kodak box camera and... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 18, 2013 00:44:36   #
Mogul wrote:
PhotoTex wrote:
Mogul wrote:
If yours is a Brownie #2, it takes 120 film. Look here for some information:
http://www.etsy.com/listing/117786701/vintage-1915-kodak-brownie-no-2-box


Thanks for the response. The camera indicates it was built for 120 film, but doesn't say what speed is needed. I bought a role of ASA 400, but I was trying to find out if another speed would work better. If so, I can exchange what I have for a more appropriate film


Mogul
Thanks for the suggestion and link. I think I will return one of the 2 400 ISO I purchased and try to get a 100 ISO. Then I will try both.
Photo Tex

Generally older films had very low ASA (ISO) ratings. I would suggest you use a film with a speed of 100 (or less if you can find one). Here is the address for a site that will show you your options:
http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?op=itemlist&cat1=Film%20%26%20Darkroom&cat2=Film&cat3=Black%20%26%20White%20Film
quote=PhotoTex quote=Mogul If yours is a Brownie... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 17, 2013 18:13:48   #
jerryc41 wrote:
PhotoTex wrote:
Mogul wrote:
If yours is a Brownie #2, it takes 120 film. Look here for some information:
http://www.etsy.com/listing/117786701/vintage-1915-kodak-brownie-no-2-box


Thanks for the response. The camera indicates it was built for 120 film, but doesn't say what speed is needed. I bought a role of ASA 400, but I was trying to find out if another speed would work better. If so, I can exchange what I have for a more appropriate film

I'd shoot the 400 and see how it turns out - probably dark (maybe not). Maybe the developing will compensate for poor exposure. Lower speed film was more common when this camera was new.
quote=PhotoTex quote=Mogul If yours is a Brownie... (show quote)


Jerry
Thanks for your help.
Jim
Go to
Mar 17, 2013 13:08:35   #
Danilo wrote:
You didn't mention the film size your camera takes (620, 616, 827, blahblahblah). Your choice of film speed may well be restricted by what is still available, perhaps only one. Most likely it would be around ASA/ISO 100 to 200, which is fine for general use.


I sent a message to the owner of a similar camer to ask about speed, but he hasn't responded yet. If he doesn't, I will take your advice and exchange one roll I have for an ASA of 200.
Go to
Mar 17, 2013 13:04:44   #
Mogul wrote:
If yours is a Brownie #2, it takes 120 film. Look here for some information:
http://www.etsy.com/listing/117786701/vintage-1915-kodak-brownie-no-2-box


Thanks for the response. The camera indicates it was built for 120 film, but doesn't say what speed is needed. I bought a role of ASA 400, but I was trying to find out if another speed would work better. If so, I can exchange what I have for a more appropriate film
Go to
Mar 17, 2013 00:57:49   #
I have a 1915 Kodak box camera and I would like to take some pictures to see how well these early cameras worked. But I have no idea what speed film to buy. Does anyone have some ideas on this?
Photo Tex
Go to
Feb 24, 2013 12:23:35   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Someone sent me this from a Facebook post.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=4328580861337

Jerry, It get much worse than that. As a Psychologist in Texas I see teen step-daughters accuse their step-fathers of sexually abusing them when the step-father will not let them do something they really want to do, like date a 24 year-old-dropout. The step-father will be under suspicion for the rest of his life. This is not uncommon.
PhotoTex
Go to
Jan 19, 2013 23:00:35   #
Thanks folks. I really appreciate your opinions
PhotoTex
Go to
Jan 10, 2013 04:50:10   #
lighthouse wrote:
I use the non L Canon 100mm F/2.8 on a 5D2
It is a very good lens and I have heard it may even be slightly sharper than the L version.


The non auto focus one, right?
Go to
Jan 10, 2013 04:49:35   #
dawson54 wrote:
I think I have every bit of equipment Canon sells for macro photography, from the 100mm L and 180mm L primes to the 2x extender, the 1X-5X micro lens, the 90mm Tilt-Shift (it does great close-ups!), and even a ring light flash for good measure. By far the 100mm L is the one I use the most. It is just an outstanding lens, from macros to portraits to telephoto. If it's not on my camera, it's in my bag. The other gear is all wonderful, but I think most people will get the most use out of the 100mm.
I think I have every bit of equipment Canon sells ... (show quote)

Wish I could afford the L lens
Photoex
Go to
Jan 10, 2013 04:48:47   #
Wendy2 wrote:
I have the Canon 100 mm. It is not an L lens but it sure thinks it is! Sharp, sharp, sharp!


Thanks. With the current recommendations and a limited budget, that's the one I will probably go with.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.