Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jkatpc
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 38 next>>
Jul 10, 2018 08:35:28   #
sippyjug104 wrote:
Right on target..! Excellent series of dragonflies.


Thanks for taking the time to look! They were more cooperative than the hummingbirds.
Go to
Jul 9, 2018 12:21:33   #
kpmac wrote:
Very nicely done.


Thanks for taking the time to look.
Go to
Jul 9, 2018 12:21:07   #
Dr.Nikon wrote:
Nice work .., #1 is the most popular .. your 850 seems to likes the Tamron ...


Thanks! I like that one best myself also.
Go to
Jul 8, 2018 18:52:23   #
AlohaJim wrote:
Beautiful first shot.
Great clarity.
You nailed it!
aloha
jim


Thanks, Jim!
Go to
Jul 8, 2018 17:49:07   #
jaymatt wrote:
Nice, Jim--especially the first one.

Thanks, John! It is also my favorite.
Go to
Jul 8, 2018 17:42:45   #
Wow! I especially like the Milky Way shot over the cemetery.
Go to
Jul 8, 2018 17:37:48   #
Although I initially set out to capture hummingbird images, there were more dragonflies flitting about the yard than I remember seeing in the past several years. Maybe the above normal rain. Anyway, I stalked less suspicious quarry. Nikon D850 with Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2, somewhat high shutter speeds and a speedlight to manage the ambient light.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Mar 13, 2018 05:44:33   #
Thanks for posting this, SS. I'm very interested in portraiture but have not done much of it. I'm going to concentrate on honing my skills and practice. Here is one of a couple of my granddaughters (with my wife holding a gold reflector since it was a dreary, grey day).


(Download)
Go to
Feb 9, 2018 05:52:34   #
pounder35 wrote:
LOL!!!! Photography is supposed to be relaxing. I tend to shoot nature subjects that don't move. Trees, mountains, etc. I did have this subject pose for me. Very patient.


Looks like his contact fell out :)
Go to
Jan 31, 2018 05:56:05   #
Apaflo wrote:
The wrong kind of processing was used on the warbler image. It emphasized the photon noise rather than removing it.

Smoothing rather than sharpening is needed on the background. Only the detail of the bird itself needs any sharpen applied.

A quick reality check can verify this, though it will not come even close to providing a production image. Just mask off, or use a simple selection for the background, to separate it from the subject. The selection can be feathered to make the transition less obnoxious. Adjust the feathering depending on the pixel dimensions of the image being worked on. Then apply a Gaussian blur to the entire background. Experiment with how much feathering and how much blur.

Then reprocess from the beginning and back up one step for anything that brings out noise in the background.

Incidentally this demonstrates a case where "capture sharpening" is very detrimental.
The wrong kind of processing was used on the warbl... (show quote)


Thanks for the information. I haven't ventured into the more advanced areas of Photoshop yet (only editing in Lightroom). Appreciate your observations.
Go to
Jan 25, 2018 19:00:52   #
Steve Mc wrote:
Jkatpc that was a 850? So nice WOW!


Yes indeed and a severe crop to boot. Thanks!
Go to
Jan 25, 2018 18:54:19   #
mcveed wrote:
Speaking of rabbit holes and pointless posts, let me introduce you to Chris... 343 posts!!
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-509204-1.html


lol!
Go to
Jan 25, 2018 18:50:50   #
Mark M USN RET wrote:
Hey Jim, Concur. ...and Great pics. I can see Kathy and Michelle having a fit over us communicating via UHH

Mark


Mark, sent you a PM. Great to see you here!
Go to
Jan 24, 2018 05:54:58   #
GalaxyCat wrote:
I don't want the D850 any more because I've read that there is too much noise. Maybe the pixels are just too many, or too small so that the limit of the technology is reached in this design. Plus, the camera has to be even more sensitive to vibration/shake/etc... due to the smaller pixels, which is required if the sensor is the same size as other dslrs, which is the 35mm size.

Comments?


I do not believe it to be too noisy nor subject to blur if used with the right lenses and using the right technique. True, it does challenge you, but the results are spectacular, in my opinion. Here is a mallard and a yellow-pumped warbler, both cropped to just about 1:1 in LR, and the detail is pretty good. Lens was Tamron 70-200 2.8. I have the D850 and D500, and find the noise level at high ISOs to be more than acceptable, with the D850 less noticeable due to higher resolution.


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Jan 3, 2018 20:28:54   #
MT Shooter wrote:
PROOF OF PURCHASE is the one and only way ALL manufacturers verify that you actually bought the lens new and not used. Its required! If you choose to sacrifice your 6 year warranty right because you are too "embarrassed" to ask for a copy of the receipt, then that is your choice and your choice ALONE. If she does not want you to know what she paid for the lens she can simply black out the amount. But Tamron NEEDS to know WHEN the lens was bought AND whether or not it was bought from an authorized dealer to validate the warranty. No camera or lens manufacturer will require any less! Tamron offer their "Pre-Registration", you do not HAVE to pre-register for warranty work, but you WILL have to submit that proof of purchase to receive warranty repairs in the future. Their pre-registration is simply a convenience to the customer so you don't have to submit that same documentation again in the future should you need service.
Time to put on the big boy pants and follow all the rules that the rest of the world has to follow!
PROOF OF PURCHASE is the one and only way ALL manu... (show quote)


Thank you.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 38 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.