Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PVR8
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 41 next>>
Sep 9, 2018 13:07:13   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Bring one DSLR and one compact and the 16-300mm lens, depending its size and weight. You have to decide if this is a photo trip, with allowances made in traveling for taking time to set up and adjust, or if it is a pleasure trip, during which you'll take pictures. If you're on a tour, how much leeway will they allow for your to chance lenses and cameras and change settings. On a tour of China years ago, most people were fast with their photography, but one woman with a DSLR kept everyone behind her waiting while she got the best shot ever taken by a camera.
Bring one DSLR and one compact and the 16-300mm le... (show quote)


Thanks Jerry. I am going to do what you suggest but I am also leaning towards taking the Tokina 11-16 also since it's so great for wide angle and interior shots.
Go to
Sep 9, 2018 00:13:16   #
rcarol wrote:
I would limit it to the Tamron 16-300. The Tokina is a great lens but is big and heavy. You can always shoot and stitch in post if you need anything wider. Travel light and enjoy yourself. And by all means, take the P&S as well.


Good advice. Thanks!
Go to
Sep 8, 2018 23:06:23   #
Hey guys & gals, I am traveling to Cuba in about a week and I want to do as much picture taking as possible. I'm going to take a art tour that includes museum art, statues, and street art. I wanted to get some opinions about what gear I should take with me. My arsenal includes two dslr bodies, Nikon D200 and D7100. I'm not sure if I should take both bodies since I will also be taking a Nikon Coolpix s9500 p&s camera. My biggest concern is what lenses to take as I want to travel with the minimal amount of gear needed to do some good shooting. My lens arsenal includes Nikon 50mm 1.8 Nikon 18-55mm , Nikon 55-200mm , Tokina 11-16mm 2.8 , Tamron 16-300mm , Tamron 90mm 2.8 macro. I generally use the 18-55mm & 55-200mm when I'm shooting with the D200. I was thinking that the Tokina 11-16 & Tamron 16-300 might be all I need. Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thanks....
Go to
Aug 23, 2018 21:43:35   #
drmike99 wrote:
I am surprised by the single card slot choice. But my first 7 years with a DSLR (2010-2017) were spent with a single card camera (D5000) and I never felt any kind of lack. Since last year I’ve had my D7100 and 2 cards. Since I use one card for JPEG fine and the other for Raw, I see it only as a convenience (I use the JPEG images mostly SOOC — occasionally cropped — and Raw to post process) so even with my 2 cards I don’t have a true fail-safe backup for card failure and frankly I don’t see that lack as a deficit.
I am surprised by the single card slot choice. But... (show quote)


Agreed...
Go to
Aug 23, 2018 13:41:18   #
timcc wrote:
As a Sony user, I welcome the Nikon and future Canon entries in the mirrorless market. I will stick with Sony, but the increased competition will benefit us all. That said, even if I were a Nikon fan, I would wait a year or two for the inevitable bugs to be worked out of the brand new models. Mirrorless has never been a Nikon forte, so I expect some growing pains.


That's good logical advice. The price may also decrease over the next year or two. I might be ready to switch over to mirrorless by then, but I'm in no rush to do it as I'm still getting great photos with my D7100 and even with old faithful, beloved D200.
Go to
Aug 23, 2018 00:46:52   #
Pegasus wrote:
It will be in a few hours. Anyone planning to watch it live?


I just watched it. Very interesting. Nikon declared its determination to become the number one camera manufacturer in the world. The head of the imaging production division said that Nikon will continue to make improvements and advancements to it's line of dslr and mirrorless cameras. The two mirrorless models seem to have been engineered to jump into the mirrorless foray in a very big way. It will be interesting to see the results from testing of the cameras capabilities and the marks they receive. I hope they do very well.
Go to
Aug 23, 2018 00:33:27   #
Hey guys, I just finished watching the Nikon's live from Japan unveiling of the new Nikon Z mirrorless cameras. The marketing slogan is "THE RE-INVENTION OF MIRRORLESS". The head of Nikon's imaging production division said that Nikon will continue to make new developments and improvements to Nikon's dslr cameras and mirrorless models.
Go to
Aug 22, 2018 19:14:29   #
therwol wrote:
The article does mention using and adapter for a DSLR lens on a mirrorless camera. If the flange-back distance is less with mirrorless, then it's possible. I think it's a given that Nikon will have to offer such an adapter. So the question I have is whether that expensive 2 grand zoom that someone just bought will work on the newer cameras without any loss of functionality/speed. I think it's given that Nikon lenses that require a focusing motor in the camera, some of which are still made, will be pretty much dead in the water. I think that initially, these cameras will appeal to people with a lot of money or those who don't have a lot invested in the older technology and first time buyers.
The article does mention using and adapter for a D... (show quote)


True. And even many first time buyers may not opt for mirrorless until they become far less expensive. Many first time consumers may opt for less expensive dslr camera bundles for taking pictures of family members and vacations. They may not be highly educated regarding detailed camera specs or pros and cons. They just want nice pictures that they find affordable. I'm a hobbyist who's primary objective is to capture pictures of things that I find interesting, beautiful, or memorable and I don't necessarily need the latest and greatest gear to do that. I'm sure there are many other consumers who share the same perspective. I enjoy chiming in on this blog and learning & sharing ideas in a respectful way. This is a wonderful blog minus the occasional idiot who comes in and attempts to denigrate others.
Go to
Aug 22, 2018 18:51:41   #
gwilliams6 wrote:
PVR8 if you hadn't come with your totally fake news post, and had real facts to present, I would have respected that, even if I disagreed with your conclusions. Then maybe someone would not have had to educate you to the truth. Sorry if in your case, the truth hurts.


You apparently have mental health problems. Take your meds as prescribed or go slither back under the rock you came from and wait for another oportunity to display your deplorable vile existence.
Go to
Aug 22, 2018 12:56:22   #
therwol wrote:
Will there be a lens adapter available out of the gate? Will there be full functionality with current lenses? Those are questions that people with a lot of money invested in their DSLR equipment will be asking.


Here's a rational unbiased answer.

https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/features/dslr-vs-mirrorless-cameras-how-do-they-compare
Go to
Aug 22, 2018 12:48:37   #
Shutterbug57 wrote:
It all depends on what you mean by "replacing". In new camera sales, MILCs are doing pretty well. In the installed MILC/SLR/DSLR base, they are a much smaller part. Obsolescence, either technical or physical, will be the major determining factor in when SLRs & DSLRs are removed from the population of cameras at work (pro or otherwise). Think of how long it took to get the cars from the 1960s & 1970s off the road. Newer cars did not replace them as they just went used market, but sooner or later, they just quit working.

Now, with DSLRs, let's look at my installed base. I have a D70s, D200 & D500. I also have a X-T2 MILC. The D70s is pretty much obsolete, technically, and is reserved for training grandkids - it still works, just at 6MP with the noise profile of a ~20 year old camera. The D200 I still use, mostly as a backup or second lens camera to support the D500. I look at DSLRs like computers. In the 1980s, you had to buy a new computer every couple of years as the technology advanced, by 2000, the Pentium had come in and computers lasted much longer. Today's computers will last a good long time before they require replacement. The D50/D70 era was the early age of DSLRs, they were underpowered and needed replacement fairly quickly. The D200 still works fine, if there is enough light - same as always. Over 800 ISO, it is a noise master. In the lower ISP range, it puts out fine images. The D500 works well even in low light. For what I shoot, it should last many, many years. Yes, new tech will come out, but the D500 with my pro-level glass will continue to put out fine images.

I bought the X-T2 as a briefcase camera as it is small and light and can cover 18-200 with 2 small and good quality lenses. If forced to pick between the D500 & X-T2, I would go with the D500, but I am enjoying the X-T2 quite a lot. BUT, the X-T2 has not taken the D200 or D500 "off the road".
It all depends on what you mean by "replacing... (show quote)


Of course, what you're saying makes practical sense. Mirrorless is a newer and more advanced technology, but to think that mirrorless is going to replace dslr is simply wishful thinking. There is far too much investment into dslr for that to happen any time soon! The current glut of dslr cameras, lenses, and accessories in the camera market place will in itself keep dslr quite viable for quite awhile.
Go to
Aug 22, 2018 12:27:22   #
gwilliams6 wrote:
Sorry PVR8, you need to look at the numbers and the market graphs, it is happening already that mirrorless is replacing DSLRs. Many DSLR users like you are just in denial about reality. You have never used the latest mirrorless , or you would know the truth is they have significant advantages that NO DSLR can EVER physically have. That is why pros and amateurs alike are switching. And that is why Nikon and Canon are putting their best money and tech into new fullframe mirrorless systems. Nikon's debuts tomorrow, Canon's debuts likely by Sept. 4.

You are so wrong and uninformed. All mirrorless companies DO NOT manufacture DSLR cameras. But the major Japan Camera Makers Executives at latest JCM convention publicly stated that the reign of the DSLR is over and mirrorless is the future, here now. DSLRs wont disappear overnight, but their dominance is over, that is just reality.
Your lack of any real knowledge here is truly sad.
Sorry PVR8, you need to look at the numbers and th... (show quote)


Your trashy condescending lashing out at someone who disagrees with your perspective is what's truly sad and quite immature. This very informative helpful blog and the decent people who share here deserves better than your undesirable inflammatory input!
Go to
Aug 22, 2018 00:32:52   #
Mirrorless may eventually replace dslr but no time soon. There are too many consumers who are invested in dslr equipment that they are familiar with and attached to. Mirrorless will undoubtedly cut into the camera market but the advantages of mirrorless cameras are not significant enough to have most consumers re-invest in photography gear. This why all of the current mirrorless manufacturers are still manufacturing dslr cameras. The primary concern for the majority of consumers is the quality of the photographs they take and very high quality photos can be achieved with dslr cameras and good lenses. Many people predicted that cell phone cameras would be the end of dslr but that hasn't happened and it will be quite awhile before that happens, if ever. It's more likely that mirrorless will someday over take dslr, but not right away, IMHO..
Go to
Aug 16, 2018 22:48:59   #
HOT Texas wrote:
I guess you haven't been out with me I see them everywhere and my local KCEN TV was shooting a Video for news cast last week with a Sony a7rIII and your right Not Dead YET, but on there way out.


I don't think Nikon or Canon are on the way out. Each of the manufacturers have loyal followers and they will introduce new offerings to compete in the market. Nikon is supposed to be releasing 2 new full frame mirrorless cameras very soon and I'm sure Canon isn't going to drop out of the competition. I'm a member of a couple of photography clubs and each club has over 2000 members. The vast majority of the members in either club use either Nikon or Canon cameras and there are far less Sony users in the groups.
Go to
Aug 16, 2018 22:30:05   #
1046William wrote:
I am another user Of Nikon D7100. I have two San disk Extreme Pro cards in each slot. I am just learning how to process RAW shots. I want to use the comined setting of RAW + jpeg. I would think given the lack of storage Slpt #2 should be set for overflow. When I am shooting on a wildlife trip I can easily shoot up to a thousand shots a day. Usual on continuous 8fps bursts. Using the RAW + jpeg setting how many shots would I be able to get on both cards?


1046William: I just grabbed my camera and discovered that it was set for medium image size so I changed it to large image size and the shots remaining on the cards went from 2300 down to 1300. So if shooting in large image it seems that the 32 gig cards will hold approx. 1300-1400 shots.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 41 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.