Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bob97
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Sep 29, 2014 10:33:53   #
Thanks for all of the links you have posted recently. They were very helpful.
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 17:10:42   #
blacks2 wrote:
Some fall scenes of the Tetons.


Wow! These are spectacular.
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 16:46:34   #
boberic wrote:
Pardon my lack of knowledge (which is astounding) buta re there cameras with on board HDR bracketing?


I don't know much about HDR, but I think so. I am certain there are people on the main discussion thread who would know for sure.
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 11:18:07   #
Merlin1300 wrote:
And that's where the camera is at a great disadvantage! The human eye has the ability to detect a single photon of light - when properly dark adapted - and some have estimated a total dynamic range of about 20 stops !!
http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html
So - - if the image has uniform lighting - then the camera can produce a fairly good likeness of what you saw with a single shot.
But what really makes for intriguing photos - are lights and shadows - and that is where working images in Post can be helpful - from boosting the darks and blunting the brights to recompose a more faithful JPG rendition from the captured RAW data - to using Auto-Bracket and a HDR program to produce something more like what you remember seeing.
http://essenceinphotography.com/beginning-your-journey-to-perfect-hdr-photography/processing-a-prefect-hdr-photograph/
Just another aspect of Photography designed to keep us off the streets and hidden in our back-room computer labs :D :D
And that's where the camera is at a great disadvan... (show quote)


Wow. Thanks again for the info. and the links - very good stuff. I have been spending more and more time at my computer slowly learning the intricacies of the post-production process.
Go to
Sep 22, 2013 08:41:32   #
R.G. wrote:
This is what "real" HDR is all about - trying to bring the brightness levels of the picture closer to what the eye sees.

Some people enjoy the surreal uber-pop that excessive HDR gives, but that is not the proper use of HDR. In fact that is exactly what a serious HDR user would go to great lengths to avoid.


Yes. That is what I am after, trying to get the camera to capture what I see (or think I see).
Go to
Sep 22, 2013 08:38:33   #
Hopesfate wrote:
I didn't realize the "quote reply " was there in the beginning either.
It does help for everyone to know who we are replying to. I was just rambling along until someone kindly told me to use it. &#128522; Welcome.


Thanks. I usually just read and learn.
Go to
Sep 22, 2013 08:37:25   #
Merlin1300 wrote:
Right - - then you needn't care about the intricacies of aperture and shutter priorities -
as long as you understand the difference, and how each will effect DOF and motion blur - you'll be all set.
For whatever mode (aperture or shutter priority) you choose - would set +1/2 to 1 eV and pick the best shot.


I have got the "knowing" down pretty well as far as aperture and shutter speed are concerned; however, it doesn't always translate into a good picture. Time and practice....
Go to
Sep 21, 2013 18:18:32   #
speters wrote:
It all depends what you bracket for. There is White Balance Bracketing, Shutterspeed bracketing for HDR and so on.What are you trying to do?


I am trying to produce the best image I can but am not really into HDR. Thanks for your response.
Go to
Sep 21, 2013 18:17:13   #
Merlin1300 wrote:
Nope - - but as some have mentioned - many autobracket for purposes of doing HDR in post (post processing)
http://www.stuckincustoms.com/
and if THAT is your purpose - then - yes - you should be shooting Av (for Canonites) - or constant aperture
When auto-bracketing - if so enabled - the camera will shoot 3, 5, 7 shots automatically with constant ISO and Aperture - varying the shutter speed to obtain different exposures - typically +1-2 eV around the camera's nominally determined exposure.
IF the scene is bright enough - you may do this handheld - but if your shutter speeds get much below 1/60 to 1/30 sec (depending on your image stabilization) - you'd be better off on a Tripod.
-
IF you don't CARE about HDR - and just want to pick the best shot of the three - then you can shoot whatever mode you want.
-
I don't know if your camera supports auto-bracketing - but it is a nice capability to have.
Nope - - but as some have mentioned - many autobra... (show quote)


Thanks for all the info. I am not really interested in HDR at present. I am just trying to get the best exposure I can.
Go to
Sep 21, 2013 14:33:28   #
boberic wrote:
I guess the shortest answer is no. But as has been said it all depends on what you are looking for. If you are looking to control motion blur or camera shake then shutter bracketing is a good idea.If you are simply looking for the "best exposure" either or might work best,


Thanks for your help. I thought that might be the case.
Go to
Sep 21, 2013 10:23:01   #
jeep_daddy wrote:
Most people do bracket so that only shutter speed affects the exposure. If your camera is in M or Av (A), then only shutter duration is affected. If you set your camera in Tv (S) then the camera will adjust the aperture settings. When this setting is used the DOF will change from frame to frame.


Thanks for the information. This is what I thought, but I always read about bracketing for aperture, not realizing that the next step in many cases is HDR.
Go to
Sep 21, 2013 10:20:40   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Please use the Quote Reply tab, so we know to whom your reply is directed. (as I did on this reply)


Thanks. I am somewhat new to this.
Go to
Sep 20, 2013 19:57:55   #
Nice shots. I particularly like #2.
Go to
Sep 20, 2013 19:56:13   #
Thanks for the info. Nikonian72.
Go to
Sep 20, 2013 19:55:48   #
Thanks. I didn't consider HDR since I have never tried it.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.