I shoot my Hasselblad occasionally with B&W 110 film. I develop the film myself and want to scan it for post processing high quality JPEG images. Most of the film scanners I was able to find online are limited to 35mm film. The only film scanner for 110 film I was able to get information on is the Kodak 7" Digital Film Scanner. Ratings for ease of use are very high, and quality ratings are mixed. However, the ratings are mixed because they seem to conflate scanner quality with editing features. I don't care about the scanner's editing features because I will use my post-processing software to convert the negatives to positives and then edit them. Any comments on the Kodak film scanners from UHH participants that have used it? Alternatively, does anyone have specific experience with other scanners you would recommend? Thanks to all!

USB-C is just a connector. The (not) fun starts when you realize that there are different LEVELS of USB-C cables that are required for certain devices. Using the wrong one can ruin your day.

Thunderbolt 4/USB4 cables with USB-C on both ends work with all current device standards. They're expensive, though!

Thunderbolt 3/USB4 cables work with everything but Thunderbolt 4. About the same price or a little less than TB4/USB4...

USB 3.2 cables with USB-C on both ends don't do USB4 or Thunderbolt 3 or 4. Much more affordable if you don't need more than 10 Mbps.

USB-C CHARGING cables don't move data, or move data so slowly you might as well not use them.

…and I've only scratched the surface.

If you have USB-C cables, MARK THEM so you know their purpose. It's very easy to limit the performance of an SSD by using the wrong cable. Just using a USB-A to USB-C adapter with an SSD and a USB 3.2 cable can cut its top speed in half.

Nope, you are misinformed, or do not understand how raw works. Dirtfarmer is right.

They is a jpeg embedded inside the raw file. That is what you see when opening a raw file, IF you have a viewer/program that will view it. Not all programs will open a raw file to view the embedded jpeg. You can not "post", as upload to a site, a raw file on the Internet. No one at this time has the capability to use a raw file. What you can do is, if you have an editing program or viewer, is open the raw file and save what you are viewing, which is the embedded jpg, them upload that file. Places, like UHH, have a list of file type you can upload.

I've never seen a place where you can upload a raw file for use on their end. Enlighten is if you do.

Also, the is no such cables as you mention. When you download from your camera to you computer, you are downloading the raw file. Now, if you shot raw plus jpeg, both will download if you select both. If you have such cables, show us a link that describes them.