Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: Swede
Page: <<prev 1 ... 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 next>>
Jul 6, 2012 13:31:38   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Can anybody help me with this
Thanks All, I finally did have a pretty good look at the Camera. There are no holes in the bellows the lens plate and lens are there, so is what I think is the focus plate, no hood came with it but a towel worked just fine. I figured out the fstop and shutter speed, BUT what I can't figure out is how you focus it. I think the lens is suppose to slide back and forth on its track, but how do you keep the shutter open to focus it.
I'll get it eventually, with all your help, much appreciated
5x7 negatives
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 16:53:13   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Shutter count
jerryc41 wrote:
Swede wrote:
jerryc41 wrote:
Rader wrote:
I downloaded this free version but havent seen where it tells me how many times my shutter has been triggered? Maybe I am overlooking something.


MT Shooter wrote:
Here is a link to the most complete EXIF data reader I have ever found. Use the freeware version, it won't let you edit EXIF data but its great for reading it:

http://www.picmeta.com/products/picture-information-extractor.htm

What make and model camera?

Nikon D200 and D2x
Swede
quote=jerryc41 quote=Rader I downloaded this fre... (show quote)

Here's more for you to try.

Shutter Count
*http://www.camerashuttercount.com/
*http://kentweakley.com/blog/photo-tip-photos-camera/
*http://regex.info/exif.cgi
*Get Irfanview (free) and also get the plug-ins for it. Start the program, open a photo, click on Image > Information > Exif info.
*Get ExifInfo - also free. Unzip and get the icon onto the Desktop. Find a photo and drag it onto the icon. A window will open with loads of info. Look down the list for Shutter Count (or whatever they call it).
*http://www.cambridgeincolour.com):For Canon users, try this: http://www.astrojargon.net
*For Nikon users check this: http://drchung.new21.net/previewextractor/
*http://www.astrojargon.net/EOSInfo.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
quote=Swede quote=jerryc41 quote=Rader I downlo... (show quote)


Thank You Sir, but that's enough for today
Greatley Appreciated though
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 16:51:09   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
What Should Have Been Immediately Obvious is Now In Specific Relief
gym wrote:
Are any of you fans of the Original Star Trek? Remember the episode where a life form invaded the ship and fed on anger, hostility, and rage? The crew finally defeated it by getting their emotions in check, and literally laughed the creature off the ship.

This guy is a troll and feeds on all these responses. In a way it's a lot like some here who specialize in invectives and vitriol on the political discussions. They don't discuss, they 'stir'. And it's the venom and the exchange of insults that serve as food for their egos. If we would leave his ridiculous treads totally empty, I think he'd just wither up and disappear.
Are any of you fans of the Original Star Trek? Rem... (show quote)


The Star Trek episode that he reminds me of is the one with the kids before puberty on a planet that were healthy, yet all the parents died, but soon as they go through puberty they get this disease. Maybe it's just the change, young or old??
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 16:45:20   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
What Should Have Been Immediately Obvious is Now In Specific Relief
jerryc41 wrote:
les_stockton wrote:
I'm not sure what the issue is, unless a person has a chip on their shoulder to begin with. When I'm on here, I generally expect that most probably have a better camera than me (certainly newer), but there are a few that don't. I've never tried to suggest to anyone that I'm better because I have a better camera, and I certainly haven't suggested that anyone that has a better camera than mine means that they're a better photographer. It is what it is. Some day, I'll have better equipment, but for now, I work with what I have, and with most people that don't have as good as I do, I give them the same advise; learn the principles of photography, and then get the most you can out of the equipment that you have.

Honestly, I don't recall any posts by Tarkus. I think I would've remembered the name, but I'll go back and check. Maybe it was in threads that I just didn't read.
I'm not sure what the issue is, unless a person ha... (show quote)

He had a different avatar then. http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-49168-1.html
quote=les_stockton I'm not sure what the issue is... (show quote)

Maybe some kinda pill from S/W- WOW. yet I know that down south you are aloud to voice your opinion as here above the 49th.
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 16:36:44   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Shutter count
jerryc41 wrote:
Rader wrote:
I downloaded this free version but havent seen where it tells me how many times my shutter has been triggered? Maybe I am overlooking something.


MT Shooter wrote:
Here is a link to the most complete EXIF data reader I have ever found. Use the freeware version, it won't let you edit EXIF data but its great for reading it:

http://www.picmeta.com/products/picture-information-extractor.htm

What make and model camera?

Nikon D200 and D2x
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 16:28:35   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
What Should Have Been Immediately Obvious is Now In Specific Relief
Rachel wrote:
Swede wrote:
mollymolly wrote:
les_stockton wrote:
I'm not sure what the issue is, unless a person has a chip on their shoulder to begin with. When I'm on here, I generally expect that most probably have a better camera than me (certainly newer), but there are a few that don't. I've never tried to suggest to anyone that I'm better because I have a better camera, and I certainly haven't suggested that anyone that has a better camera than mine means that they're a better photographer. It is what it is. Some day, I'll have better equipment, but for now, I work with what I have, and with most people that don't have as good as I do, I give them the same advise; learn the principles of photography, and then get the most you can out of the equipment that you have.

Honestly, I don't recall any posts by Tarkus. I think I would've remembered the name, but I'll go back and check. Maybe it was in threads that I just didn't read.
I'm not sure what the issue is, unless a person ha... (show quote)


Do go back and check. He started a stink a couple of days ago. Also, once he starts a thread he has NEVER gone back and responded on it.
quote=les_stockton I'm not sure what the issue is... (show quote)


Any kind of attention is better than none
Swede
quote=mollymolly quote=les_stockton I'm not sure... (show quote)


Which is why Tarkus needs a big group HUG! :lol: :lol: :lol:
quote=Swede quote=mollymolly quote=les_stockton... (show quote)


I think he needs alot more than a hug!
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 16:26:46   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Shutter count
jerryc41 wrote:
jerryc41 wrote:
Swede wrote:
THANKS

What you can get varies considerably. When I'm back on my computer, I'll send you a link.

Here are charts showing shutter failure. Testing is one thing, but real world experience is another. Even if the shutter fails, it can be repaired for a reasonable cost.

Here are some links that might not have been mentioned yet.

Shutter Count
*http://www.camerashuttercount.com/
*http://kentweakley.com/blog/photo-tip-photos-camera/
*http://regex.info/exif.cgi
*Get Irfanview (free) and also get the plug-ins for it. Start the program, open a photo, click on Image > Information > Exif info.
*Get ExifInfo - also free. Unzip and get the icon onto the Desktop. Find a photo and drag it onto the icon. A window will open with loads of info. Look down the list for Shutter Count (or whatever they call it).
*http://www.cambridgeincolour.com):For Canon users, try this: http://www.astrojargon.net
*For Nikon users check this: http://drchung.new21.net/previewextractor/
*http://www.astrojargon.net/EOSInfo.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
quote=jerryc41 quote=Swede THANKS /quote br Wha... (show quote)


Thanks Again Pal
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 16:25:06   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Can anybody help me with this
St3v3M wrote:
A quick Google Search revealed -
http://www.piercevaubel.com/cam/ekc/2.htm
http://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/8689130
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Eastman_View_Camera_No._2-D
and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWS4NE8d6dY


Thank You
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 16:17:47   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
What Should Have Been Immediately Obvious is Now In Specific Relief
mollymolly wrote:
les_stockton wrote:
I'm not sure what the issue is, unless a person has a chip on their shoulder to begin with. When I'm on here, I generally expect that most probably have a better camera than me (certainly newer), but there are a few that don't. I've never tried to suggest to anyone that I'm better because I have a better camera, and I certainly haven't suggested that anyone that has a better camera than mine means that they're a better photographer. It is what it is. Some day, I'll have better equipment, but for now, I work with what I have, and with most people that don't have as good as I do, I give them the same advise; learn the principles of photography, and then get the most you can out of the equipment that you have.

Honestly, I don't recall any posts by Tarkus. I think I would've remembered the name, but I'll go back and check. Maybe it was in threads that I just didn't read.
I'm not sure what the issue is, unless a person ha... (show quote)


Do go back and check. He started a stink a couple of days ago. Also, once he starts a thread he has NEVER gone back and responded on it.
quote=les_stockton I'm not sure what the issue is... (show quote)


Any kind of attention is better than none
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 15:58:46   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
What Should Have Been Immediately Obvious is Now In Specific Relief
Swede wrote:
Tarkus wrote:
Photography has little to do with the discussions on this board. What is pertinent here is the perenial game of one upsmanship over who's got the best gear and who can find flaws in another's photos with an electron miscroscope.

I get it now. Your needs from this hobby and mine differ. I've got the wildest machine that a retired IBM MCSE never could have imagined possible, but there will always be someone else with a better box and theoretical arguments against why my equipment deviates from the accepted norm that the gutless sheep subscribe to.

We're all doing just fine here. Let the flames begin! Just for General info, and to cut down on the PM traffic, Tarkus was the second general album release from Emerson, Lake, and Palmer. Anyone that didn't get that didn't need to ask the question.
Photography has little to do with the discussions ... (show quote)


Who gives a rats behind who has the better equipment, to me it's all about the photo you display, if you like it, you win, remember its not the camera who sees the picture, its a tool to help you display what you see!!. Next problem
Swede
quote=Tarkus Photography has little to do with th... (show quote)


Oh my Dad can beat your dad up!!
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 15:57:01   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
What Should Have Been Immediately Obvious is Now In Specific Relief
Tarkus wrote:
Photography has little to do with the discussions on this board. What is pertinent here is the perenial game of one upsmanship over who's got the best gear and who can find flaws in another's photos with an electron miscroscope.

I get it now. Your needs from this hobby and mine differ. I've got the wildest machine that a retired IBM MCSE never could have imagined possible, but there will always be someone else with a better box and theoretical arguments against why my equipment deviates from the accepted norm that the gutless sheep subscribe to.

We're all doing just fine here. Let the flames begin! Just for General info, and to cut down on the PM traffic, Tarkus was the second general album release from Emerson, Lake, and Palmer. Anyone that didn't get that didn't need to ask the question.
Photography has little to do with the discussions ... (show quote)


Who gives a rats behind who has the better equipment, to me it's all about the photo you display, if you like it, you win, remember its not the camera who sees the picture, its a tool to help you display what you see!!. Next problem
Swede
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 15:48:23   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Can anybody help me with this
I got this at an estate sale of a good friend, paid $50 for it because I thought it was pretty neat and I was going to see if I could get it to work. Well that was over a year ago and I still don’t know anything about it. All I know is what it says on the small metal plate on its front.
Any help would be appreciated, and is it worth anything, I’d never sell it but for insurance stuff. Also what size of negative does it take and can you still get the negatives.
Thanks
Swede






Go to
Jul 4, 2012 11:34:21   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Shutter count
THANKS
Go to
Jul 4, 2012 11:15:06   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Shutter count
Thanks Pal
Go to
Jul 4, 2012 10:54:08   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Shutter count
How do I find the shutter count of my Nikon D200 and D2X, I use them both a fair bit. Just kinda curious, and what would I expect to get out of them.
Thanks in advance for you help.
Swede
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.