Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: DaveyDitzer
Page: <<prev 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 ... 157 next>>
Oct 28, 2015 12:13:28   #
bobbygee wrote:
Unions aren't about national policy, although they do contribute money like PACs and other special interests. Unions are like defense lawyers--we don't care if you are legal, illegal, black white or whatever--unions exist for better wages, benefits and working conditions. Defense lawyers are only interested in the best possible defense for a client, not guilt or innocence. Unions are only interested in the workplace conditions--not work force citizenship. As far as disagreeing with union policies, the Beck decision allows any union member to opt out of paying the share of dues that aren't related to just the contract you work under.
Unions aren't about national policy, although they... (show quote)

Thank you. Even though I might disagree sometimes with unions; I found your answer to be educational and I appreciate it.
Go to
Oct 28, 2015 10:57:56   #
If you strongly believe the country will be better off with fewer illegal aliens, for whom did you vote in the last election? This is where I find unions to be conflicted and often support candidates who do not favor policies that are supported by the rank and file members.
Go to
Oct 23, 2015 21:30:38   #
jcboy3 wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge_camera


thanks for the reference. I read it and it seems to be that the Nikon P7800 as just one example, would fit the definition of a bridge camera in so far as it has a decent zoom range and a broad range of features that allow control over the final image.
Go to
Oct 23, 2015 21:10:09   #
TucsonCoyote wrote:
It's OK for you to make up your own definitions for what ever you want; however a bridge camera's definition has been well established over the passed 20 years or so .......just so you know ! :XD: 8-)

Please direct me to the "official" definition so I can learn that. Thank you.
Go to
Oct 23, 2015 15:36:24   #
Delderby wrote:
Bridge does not mean P&S - any more than does DSLR. They all have Auto everything modes - and the best now have IA. BTW - quick in camera settings are down to practice - and knowing your camera - many don't! :-)

My Nikon P7800 shoots RAW
Go to
Oct 23, 2015 15:29:24   #
Jim Bob wrote:
Your first three words should have been sufficient to clue you in on the irrelevancy of the remainder of your post.

my comment was directed to the focal length
Go to
Oct 23, 2015 15:16:26   #
billgdyoung wrote:
Without regard to cost, what is the best bridge camera... what is "best"? longest reach, best resolution, fastest lens, etc. I understand there are personal/brand preferences, but please let me know what you're thinking.

Without disparaging any of the UHH replies to this question, I guess the first question I think of is define a "bridge" camera. I have a D5300 with about 5 lenses and wanted an "always with me camera" and decided on the P7800. Still learning what it can do which a lot more than I ever expected. For me, it's the bridge between an I-phone and my DSLR; but that's my definition of "bridge". Your definition will focus your attention on candidates.
Go to
Oct 23, 2015 12:35:55   #
98corvette wrote:
Got a heck of a deal on a Canon 7D Mk 2 with a 18-135 mm kit lens for $1300.00 USA warranty from a TN. pawn shop on Ebay. Camera and lens were brand new except for the 4 shots the pawn shop took. I have a 4 L glass lens that cover the the same range so should I keep the kit lens? Or sell it to reduce my investment in the new camera. Currently have a 5D Mk 3 and selling my 7D and 28-70mm Sigma.

While not Canon, my 18-140 Nikon kit lens is a great all around choice - only one I needed for my trip to Hawaii.
Go to
Oct 21, 2015 11:48:48   #
Architect1776 wrote:
I want longevity of the image.
Storage that is more or less permanent without having to resave and back-up over and over.
I was scanning some B&W film from the late 1800's this weekend and was marveling how well it has survived in a shoe box with no special effort to preserve it. Scanning was to share these rare photos with family of pre revolution Mexico and revolution Mexico and the Southwest (Family and historical figures that were around the family).
I love digital but am concerned about legacy.
I want longevity of the image. br Storage that is ... (show quote)

While scanning some old prints, I ran across some of my dad's that looked like 3x5 contact prints from his old accordion bellows Kodak cameral. Can't imagine what film speed he used for these BWs, but the detail is amazing.
Go to
Oct 21, 2015 11:15:30   #
[
What about you? What do you want from your digital camera?[/quote]

What I want now is more than I wanted when I got my first digital (1999). I just didn't realize I needed it. The instant feedback of a digital provides instant feedback on the quality of my composition and lighting without waiting for film processing. I can experiment more and hopefully learn more. Post processing is a plus, but I'd like to use it to enhance an already well composed photo. The other side of the coin is the steep learning curve required by the camera's menus to use the camera's capability. Ditto post processing.
Go to
Oct 20, 2015 17:19:12   #
DrWilk wrote:
To all who responded, I thank you for reading as well as for letting me know someone actually is reading this. I appreciate you letting me know.


Dr. Wilk, I am reading too and think that many others are. The fascinating part of WW-I was how WW-II was birthed in WW-I. Nobody seemed to learn from the horrific devastation of WW-I and therefore were condemned to repeat the awful lesson 20 years hence. I can never comprehend the scope of what happened and continue to learn more and more about both of these wars. Thank you for taking the time and effort to offer more of this lesson of history.
Go to
Oct 20, 2015 17:06:26   #
Marilyng wrote:
I have never used a filter before on any of my lenses.It was suggested by some of the people in my photography group that I really should start.I was looking up the Hoya HD3 ultra hard UV filters & they sounded like what I would need.I want to first just buy one for my 55-300 lens but have no idea what size to get.Could someone tell me how I choose the right one, please or is there another filter brand that is better? I don't want to spend a lot of money on them. Thanks for any help you can give.
I have never used a filter before on any of my len... (show quote)


While there are two schools of thought on the use of UV or 1A filters for the purpose of lens protection, I fall in the camp of yes and I use these. However, since the quality of glass in the filter could have an impact on image quality, I would vote for buying a good quality filter so as to get good glass in front of your front lens element. My Nikon 55-300 DX lens takes a 58mm filter. Spend a little more rather than less and buy from a reputable dealer - Adorama, B&H, etc. i.e., those recommended by fellow UHH members.
Go to
Oct 15, 2015 16:34:24   #
Peterff wrote:
I do, although I don't have cable or satellite, so can't check out some of those other channels, except when I am traveling.

I have seen a huge change in CNN over that last twenty something years, and much of it has not been positive, although there are some that still seem to do excellent work.


I think Candy Crowley's execrable performance in the Romney - Obama debate pretty much sums up CNN
Go to
Oct 15, 2015 08:17:29   #
Preachdude wrote:
Sadly, Al Jazeera America is not known for either accurate or reliable reporting. One can expect a union wanting to gain a foothold to say whatever it thinks needs to be said. I used to belong to the country's largest union, and I have some experience with this. A court will probably have to decide. Fortunately for B&H, most of their business is from the internet, and there's plenty of people who want to work and earn a paycheck, so those who quit will be replaced fairly quickly.

Not sure I could rely on Al Jazeera to fairly report on a business that is identified with Jewish ownership.
.
Go to
Sep 30, 2015 10:23:40   #
bobbygee wrote:
Your lens is fine. Older lenses made a hard stop at infinity--you could twist the focusing ring until it stopped and you knew you were at the longest focus point. Newer lenses (G type for Nikon especially) do a hard stop past infinity on the distance scale; therefore you must focus manually to get a moon shot. Maybe someone here can explain the technicalities of this but know that your lens is operating the way it should.


THANK YOU. I'm relieved.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 ... 157 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.