Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Tomfl101
Page: <<prev 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 112 next>>
Oct 6, 2022 07:31:48   #
Or hopping. Great shot!
Go to
Sep 28, 2022 07:19:20   #
Totally cool!
Go to
Sep 25, 2022 07:40:34   #
Great example of breaking the 50/50 comp rule. Nicely done.
Go to
Sep 25, 2022 07:38:04   #
Nice!
Go to
Sep 23, 2022 09:09:04   #
User ID wrote:
When you move in to fill the frame after reducing the group size down to half, you are doubling the image magnification ... and that costs two stops to maintain same DoF as was available at the longer distance.

Thaz how I chose f/5.6 based on your photo at f/2.8. But yes your f/4 might work cuz facial details will be larger and easier to see at the closer distance. But, for truly equal DoF, half the distance means two stops.


Got it. Good point.
Go to
Sep 23, 2022 07:07:12   #
User ID wrote:
Nice. Distance allowed your f/2.8. But for only half as many peeps youll be at about half the distance, so f/5.6 (or even 8.0).


You are correct about distance, but I'd say even f-4 would do it. Accurate focus and tight spacing is the key. When we miss the mark on focus we tend to think a wide aperture was the culprit, when focus was the problem all along. Of course bokeh is usually not needed in group photos so choosing a small aperture is always smart when you have sufficient light.
Go to
Sep 22, 2022 07:23:19   #
Use single point focus. For a group of 8-10 use one or two rows. Focus carefully on the front row. Significant depth of field using a small aperture is advised but not necessary. See my example shot at 2.8 with a 50mm lens in evening light.


(Download)
Go to
Sep 18, 2022 07:40:52   #
Great job!
Go to
Sep 16, 2022 07:48:13   #
Hawkins wrote:
I am a yearbook advisor. Our very best lens has has just stopped working. We currently have a Canon Rebel kit, which we were gifted when we joined a specific yearbook company. I also purchased a 100-200 Canon lens, and that is the one which no longer works. (We have had the camera and lens for close to ten years.)

In talking with the school, we have decided to upgrade the yearbook camera. I have worked with Nikon and Canon before, but I have liked Canon a little bit better. So, that is my preference. We have a budget of about $3,000.

The camera's main use is sports photography, and I am the one who usually uses it. On occasion a student will take photos as well, and because of that, I am looking for something that could be simple for a novice to use.

I am not as knowledgeable as I should be about camera and was told that mirrorless is the future-- that the camera are lighter as well. Is this a good direction to head into?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
I am a yearbook advisor. Our very best lens has ha... (show quote)


I would talk to the YB company rep about getting a new camera and lens. 10 years is a long time for a “signing bonus”. If your school generates good money for them they should gladly fork out the money for an entry level mirrorless and lens.
Go to
Sep 16, 2022 07:39:54   #
This is just the same as focus stacking. I have no issue at all.
Go to
Sep 10, 2022 08:10:29   #
I was there two years ago. The guided tour was pretty good but as others said you could not use a tripod and the tour moved pretty fast. Here’s a few I got. Most were shot at 5.6 around 1600 ISO at slow shutter speeds like 15-30 sec with a 16-35 canon L on an R5


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Sep 4, 2022 07:53:15   #
The 85 gives it a nice flat perspective. No distortion.
Go to
Aug 26, 2022 09:04:01   #
The 1.6 image quality is outstanding as long as you're not enlarging beyond 16x20. I use it frequently for sports and find it hard to tell the difference between FF without serious pixel peeping. Shooting in 1.6 mode eliminates the need for tele-converters that sacrifice 1 -2 stops exposure. So consider that for low light situations. However, if you have plenty of time to post process you're always better off cropping in post.
Go to
Aug 26, 2022 08:14:36   #
Whether you shoot standard flash or HHS you are most likely dumping full power, allowing you to get just a single shot as the runners cross the finish line. As others have said, try finding the sweet spot of exposure, set your camera for high multiple, shoot raw, and process for the best result. Since you’re shooting with an R6 you might try using eye focus on a particular runner and hold the camera over your head tilting down, possibly reducing flare from the sun. Selecting a prime lens could also help by giving you maximum flare protection. The 24-105 hood is designed for 24mm and therefore provides minimal lens shading.
Go to
Aug 25, 2022 07:18:41   #
Over the long haul that extra $1300 won’t hurt so much. Go for the R5 and know you’ll have the better camera.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 112 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.