Capn_Dave wrote:
You nailed it. Saves me a lot of typing
TriX was able to research the monitor and find the power requirements...
(I'd be happy with it also.
)
markj wrote:
I get it. I guess what I'm asking is, using an
adapter rated at half an amp lower than the recommended amperage will it potentially cause harm to my equipment? Any electricians out there?
I suppose my post wasn't what you wanted to hear.
I'm only an electronics engineer, not an electrician.
Addendum: If the power supply cannot provide the rated power,
the supplied voltage may be lower than required, which may affect the operation of the device.
The voltage regulator circuitry would
try to supply the required power, and if it can't, it will overheat,
shortening the life of the power supply.
Try this: current required in amps = rated power in watts (of the monitor) divided by voltage supplied in volts (12).
If your answer is less than 1.0, it will probably work.
Your 1 Amp, 12 volt supply can supply 12 watts at the most. Power (watts) = voltage (volts) x current (amps)
User ID wrote:
SOOCers would not know "getting it right" if it bit them. They seem to espouse that "right" is when they compare their photo to their subject scene and find little to no difference.
Anybody who believes they've seen a photo nearly identical to a real world scene is simply somebody lacking in visual skills. This is NOT about art.
"Getting it right" is getting it the way you (the creator) want it, whether "reality", "impressionistic", or "best aesthetic looks".
"Right" is an individual objective, perceived by the creator.
Yes, it is a sculpture........
Rongnongno wrote:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/ricoh-rikenon-xr-35mm-f2-8.html
Doesn't the third picture look like a bayonet mount?
CHG_CANON wrote:
Real Photographers use Polaroid.
I actually used to know one years ago that did .
He would do the setup and a test shot with a Polaroid,
make any necessary adjustments, then do the exposure on, I think, a 4x5.