SharpShooter wrote:
J, for the sake of discussion, maybe I'm just cheap, but if I had the 16-35, I would not spend whatever the 14mm cost to get 2 more mm!
And when comparing distortion, did you compare the 14mm to 14mm on the 11-24, or was that full wide at 11mm? That could make a big diff.
Anyway, just saying.
Yeah, if I had a 16-35 I am pretty sure I would sit tight with it. In my case, the widest I have(had) is 24mm, so I am happy with the 14mm. If the 16mm is not wide enough for the OP, then I would definitely be getting the 11-24mm. I did not compare both at 14mm - but honestly, I am surprised by the lack of distortion (very little). Canon has some great lenses!