Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: joer
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 ... 1626 next>>
Nov 4, 2015 16:32:25   #
quixdraw wrote:
Very nice, and with no slogging thru the mud!


Thanks quixdraw. Yep, no mud on my shoes.
Go to
Nov 4, 2015 16:26:46   #
A few from today.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Nov 4, 2015 08:22:01   #
MtnMan wrote:
Took my first shots this morning. No elk so had to satisfy with my lead model and this season's birds.

I don't see a significant difference in image quality compared to the Sigma 150-500. The focus is MUCH faster. So far I have only used handheld.

I ordered a case from Amazon for $20. We'll see how it compares. It might even fit the lens with my D5300 and/or the hood attached forward. I'll probably use the Nikon sack in it as well.


Thanks for the post this is valuable info.

I'm impressed with the dog image but not the other two which don't seem very sharp. However this may be do to conditions other than the lens.
Go to
Nov 4, 2015 08:12:19   #
MtnMan wrote:
There have been many threads on thi topic. This one is an update from the manual of my new 200-500. I suspect it means an update has been made to the technology.

As most know the pervious guidance for most lenses was turn off VR when using a tripod. They didn't mention monopods and I'd say opinions from the peanut gallery were mixed on that.

This lens has two VR modes: NORMAL and SPORT. They recommrnd the latter when the subject may move erratically. Here is what they say:

"NORMAL and SPORT vibration reduction can reduce blur when the camera is mounted on a tripod. OFF may however produce better reults in some cases depending on the type of tripod and on shooting coditiond. NORMAL and SPORT are recommended if the camera is mounted on a monopod."

Purists might note that with this lens you should never mount the camera to either a tripod or monopod. They provide a lens mounting ring for that purpose. They mention that later for tripod but not for monopod.

You can decide if this is just updated advice, and therefore applicable to other lenses, or reflects a VR upgrade and only applies to lenses with this guidance.

OBTW they still don't suggest turning VR off at high shutter speed (as some peanut gallery folk suggest). I always leave it on when using high shutter speed. I don't think shutter speed has anything to do with VR, which is stabilizing for camera movement. It at least stabilizes the image in the viewfinder.
There have been many threads on thi topic. This on... (show quote)


My experience with the Nikon 300 2.8G VRII tripod mounted using the D800E or D810 is that the auto focus is more reliable with the VR off.

As far as which method provides the best image quality; I can't decide so for all practical purposes its the same.

I shoot birds at close distance and the action is fast and furious.
Go to
Nov 4, 2015 07:58:57   #
authorizeduser wrote:
I have a Nikon D300 in mint condition. I have been offered to do an even swap for a 6 month old barely used Nikon D7000. Nothing shady here, the D7000 owner had a D200 and does not like the D7000. Good deal? I do not know a lot about the Nikon D7000 or how it compares to the D300.

Any D7000 users out there who can chime in?

Thanks in advance!


I have owned both and IMHO stick with the D300 and focus on your PP skills.

There is much more to a camera then the sensor.
Go to
Nov 4, 2015 07:52:39   #
LarryFB wrote:
I think you have to realize that it depends on what resolution you need in your print. Yes, a 6000 X 4000 pixel file will produce a 20 X 13.33 print at a print resolution of 300 dots per inch.

However, if you are willing to reduce the print resolution to 200 dots per inch, you can print a 30 X 20 inch photo.

A resolution of 300 dpi seems to be the standard for off set printing for magazines (not newspapers) or for the highest quality prints. A resolution of 200 dpi is usually considered as a good quality print as long as you don't look at the print too closely, but from a distance (think about a distance of 3 feet) it will look just perfect.
I think you have to realize that it depends on wha... (show quote)


Bingo!
Go to
Nov 4, 2015 07:45:05   #
Far North wrote:
I know I have all winter to research, but it seems the camera I am closing in on is the Nikon D7200. I have looked at others, including full frame, and quite frankly I don't see a reason to go full frame. The D7200 looks to,have all that I want in a good camera. I like the fact that I can use just about any previous edition Nikon lens with it. I don't I tend to blow anything up to poster size, so I think the D7200 will be more than adequate.

I guess want I. We'd to know is if there are any problems or issues associated with this camera that I need to be aware of. Anything negative? I am really looking forward to getting this camera and have already downloaded the user's manual for winter reading so I will have a leg up on it when I get it. And I want to get the 18--140 lens as a do-all lens to start with. Now all I have to do is get my motorcycle sold.
I know I have all winter to research, but it seems... (show quote)


If I were in your place I'd focus on cold weather operation. :lol:
Go to
Nov 3, 2015 19:12:53   #
tk wrote:
You certainly know how to use that lens!


Thanks TK.
Go to
Nov 3, 2015 15:22:43   #
bsprague wrote:
I've had my Pixma Pro 100 for two or three years now. Because I'm lucky enough to do some RV travel, I abandon the printer for months at a time. It has never been a problem. It always would start up and print with quality.

Today I tried to print for the first time since the middle of July. The print was a pink mess.

A few cartridges were low, one was empty. I replaced them and there was no improvement.

I tried the "Cleaning" function followed by a "Nozzle Check". It was still plugged up.

I tried "Deep Cleaning" and the "Nozzle Check" showed it was well.

The printer is fully functional now. I'm impressed that it could fix itself.
I've had my Pixma Pro 100 for two or three years n... (show quote)


I use an ink jet irregularly as well and the heads clog too. I'm able to work through it but most of my ink consumption is spent on head cleaning.

If it wasn't for the ability to customize and get immediate results I would farm it out to a print lab.
Go to
Nov 3, 2015 14:32:07   #
Valenta wrote:
Think you should use that lens more often.....


Agree.
Go to
Nov 3, 2015 14:31:29   #
marsdad wrote:
:thumbup: I think I would keep using it. Well done, thanks for sharing.


Thanks Marsdad.
Go to
Nov 3, 2015 10:37:29   #
Stash wrote:
Very nice series joer.


Thanks for looking and commenting.
Go to
Nov 3, 2015 08:50:00   #
Steve Perry wrote:
Attach the lens to your monopod and sling the rig over your shoulder. Usually you can balance it near where the lens meets the monopod. It's similar to how I carry my 600mm F4 + D4 + 5 series Gitzo tripod. Padding on the leg of the monopod will help. I'd keep it extended and ready for use so all you have to do is place it and shoot if you see something.

Also, good call with not putting the weight on the camera. When a lens has a foot, it's a good sign that you shouldn't support the weight by the lens mount.
Attach the lens to your monopod and sling the rig ... (show quote)


I've seen people do this but have never been comfortable with it. There is a risk of coming loose.

I'd rather do the lens strap and use a QR for the monopod.

Either way its work. This is where smaller formats shine.
Go to
Nov 3, 2015 08:33:00   #
troutbum wrote:
Looks like it is well using, very nice.


Thank you troutbum.
Go to
Nov 3, 2015 08:32:10   #
warrior wrote:
:thumbup:

I also use the Nikon 28-300.


Its my general purpose lens. Thanks for the :thumbup:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 ... 1626 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.