Posts for: rmorrison1116
Dec 21, 2022 18:49:36 #
Golden Rule wrote:
Marla out did herself with her sled this year and Sydney usually gives me some kind of great shot.
Great photos...
Dec 21, 2022 14:44:51 #
chikid68 wrote:
I have noticed (around here at least) the trend of photographers is to favor Nikon cameras over Canon or other brands.
The irony is that they are not even using the top models but rather a basic cropped sensor model.
Is this an indication of better quality or just minimal budget.
The irony is that they are not even using the top models but rather a basic cropped sensor model.
Is this an indication of better quality or just minimal budget.
From what I've been reading over the years I've been a UHH member, your observation is not as accurate as you may believe it to be.
Canon is still the number one camera manufacturer with a market share that dwarfs Nikon. Odds are that same trend is reflected in the gear owned by UHH membership.
I'm not saying Canon is better than Nikon, I own and use both.
My current daily shooters are my Nikon D850, Canon R5 and Canon R7. I have not retired my Canon 5D mk IV or Nikon D500, but they don't get used as much as they used to.
Of the cameras I mentioned, 3 are Canon and 2 are Nikon, 3 are full frame and all 5 are top shelf models, not the basic models you are referring to.
I consider myself to be an average UHH member, and not a professional photographer. Just a person who likes taking photos and enjoys having and using good gear. I also rarely post images to UHH. The only person I'm trying to impress is me.
Dec 20, 2022 11:59:09 #
rehess wrote:
My limit is about $1000. Ten years ago, I was a happy Canon user, then I was “let down” by two Rebels in a row. The R10 sounds good to me. If I were to go back to Canon, I would probably try it. Initial quality is not my concern - longevity is.
How were you let down and by which two Rebel models?
Dec 20, 2022 00:15:35 #
Not cropped. Just aligned and stacked. I think it looks better downloaded.
Dec 20, 2022 00:01:01 #
frankraney wrote:
You really have to ask?
Yes.
Dec 19, 2022 23:58:42 #
mrchunko wrote:
I have a canon R10 camera that I purchased and am hearing unfavorable reviews about-and it looks like what it is - overpriced, unnecessary, shiny junk!
Actually, the Canon EOS R10 is an excellent consumer grade camera that costs under $1000. You don't know what you are talking about. I was going to buy an R10 but decided to go with its more expensive big brother, the R7. Why did I pick the R7 over the R10? Because I could afford it.
Another thing, Tony and Chelsea Northrup named the R10 their camera of the year. Why did they choose such an inexpensive camera? Because it is well made, not overpriced, and is the ideal dedicated camera for folks who want a good quality camera but will probably never use the features on a more expensive camera.
Also, I've read and heard nothing but good reviews on the R10.
Dec 19, 2022 17:05:06 #
markwilliam1 wrote:
That’s what I thought! You don’t know what your talking about.
Something tells me we are not talking about the same thing.
Dec 19, 2022 13:43:31 #
Warhorse wrote:
That's why they make chocolate AND vanilla.
What does ice cream flavors have to do with it? It's still ice cream. Personally, I prefer strawberry.
Dec 19, 2022 11:36:31 #
markwilliam1 wrote:
Obviously you don’t own this iPhone Right?
I do not own any Apple products and probably never will.
Dec 17, 2022 15:29:59 #
Warhorse wrote:
But it still takes amazingly good photo's, one might not like the look of 16" X 20" prints so well.
Yes, it is quite capable of recording amazing images, but them a whole lot of digital cameras are. Amazingly good photos are usually the result of the individual taking the photo.
Dec 17, 2022 15:22:09 #
Retired CPO wrote:
Is there a right section??
Yeah, the out of ones mind fantasy section.
Dec 17, 2022 15:16:57 #
markwilliam1 wrote:
Yep! And and the 14 Pro Max has a 48 megapixel sensor!
Yeah, but it's a pretty darn small sensor and packing all those pixels onto a sensor that small isn't necessarily a good thing.
Dec 17, 2022 15:11:28 #
Bill_de wrote:
WD 40 is a brand now, not just the product we are familiar with. The post you reponded to said, "for electronics".
https://www.amazon.com/WD-40-Specialist-Electrical-Contact-Cleaner/dp/B00AF0OFVU
---
https://www.amazon.com/WD-40-Specialist-Electrical-Contact-Cleaner/dp/B00AF0OFVU
---
Yes, I'm familiar with the different WD-40 products. I was referring to the original and best known product, good old WD-40. Anyone who uses that on a DSLR or MILC as a lubricant is opening up a can of problems they probably don't want to deal with.
Dec 15, 2022 15:59:20 #
mrchunko wrote:
I have a canon R10 camera that I purchased and am hearing unfavorable reviews about-and it looks like what it is - overpriced, unnecessary, shiny junk!
I have read no bad reviews about the R10 at all. For its price, it is a pretty darn good camera. You say you are hearing unfavorable reviews. Where? I personally don't believe you.
Dec 13, 2022 15:24:54 #
agillot wrote:
Just wonder if a tiny amount of something like wd40 or ?? would do the trick .It is safe on plastic .
Don't use WD-40 as a lubricant on your camera! It will do more damage than help with your issues. It's primarily used to dissolve rust and displace moisture. Although it does have some lubricating properties, it was not formulated as a lubricant.