Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: joer
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 ... 1623 next>>
Dec 23, 2015 05:50:45   #
Old Grey Beard wrote:
I ran across these shots of my great grand daughter, not the best shots, but she is beautiful to me.


Nice photos and lovely child.

Sure does not resemble you. :D
Go to
Dec 23, 2015 05:48:22   #
Evie wrote:
Chilly morning


Very nice Evie.

They are usually gone in our area when it gets cold.
Go to
Dec 23, 2015 05:45:40   #
Bob Yankle wrote:
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery I wish to thank UHH member R'laine for the inspiration of attempting a Black Dahlia. Film noir fans will know the title well. Welcome to the darkest of the Dark Side.

You might be surprised at the complexity of rendering a flower to look black. If you would like to try it with one of your own images, please add it to this topic. I'd like to see what others may do with the idea.


:thumbup:
Go to
Dec 23, 2015 05:44:57   #
Treepusher wrote:
I don't shoot birds. Everyone knows that. It's even specified in my Ministry of Mayhem photographer's contract that I'm not to do so, along with dogs and kids. And yet when someone asked me if I'd shoot their Conure for Christmas and do it up in metal as a present to their daughter, I said yes.

Madame P raised an eyebrow when I told her what our assignment was, but the Ministry is seriously in arrears on our salaries, so I figure they owe the two of us a little latitude in what we do.

Besides, it's Christmas, and there are bills to pay! Martian may yell at me, but he knows better than to scold Madame P. She doesn't deal well with being chastised. She gets angry. And no one wants that. Bad things happen.

So bring on the dogs, birds, and even *gulp* kids. At least until the Ministry pays up. And anyway, if the kids get too unruly, Madame P can always make her award-winning Baked Stuffed Children for Christmas dinner.

Yum!
I don't shoot birds. Everyone knows that. It's e... (show quote)


:thumbup: :lol:
Go to
Dec 23, 2015 05:41:55   #
Moxie wrote:
A red Camellia.

These flowers have such perfection!

Thanks for viewing and commenting!

Please try the download!


Nice download.
Go to
Dec 23, 2015 05:40:29   #
Lorima wrote:
While out Christmas shopping with my son, we noticed a small herd of Elk grazing around some cabins.

The Elk on the right was trying to sleep when the other one thought it was time to play. It only lasted for about a couple of minutes, when he decided to go and bother someone else.

Estes Park, Colorado.


Lori, your images are awesome. :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 23, 2015 05:37:58   #
jaycohen13 wrote:
Montauk Lighthouse
Montauk, NY


Very nice Jay. :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 23, 2015 05:36:06   #
creativ simon wrote:
Great effect on download joer :thumbup:


Thanks Simon for the :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 23, 2015 05:35:06   #
angler wrote:
I like it very much Joer, I really like this kind of effect.Is it Topaz clean.


Thanks Jim. Yes it is.
Go to
Dec 23, 2015 01:50:59   #
tomvanb wrote:
very nice imagq, Tom


Thanks Tom for looking and the comment.
Go to
Dec 22, 2015 22:23:30   #
Pierre H.J. Dumais wrote:
I do Joe -- very much.

Pierre


Thanks Pierre.
Go to
Dec 22, 2015 22:23:05   #
Frequent Flyer wrote:
very nice


Thank you.
Go to
Dec 22, 2015 21:23:09   #
Hope you like it.


(Download)
Go to
Dec 22, 2015 19:49:35   #
kenabr wrote:
I just purchased the chipped version of this lens for my Nikon D610. I'm currently evaluating it and it seems sharp enough but does display some distortion. I'm wondering if anyone else has experience with this lens. Considering the price it appears to be a good deal. I also looked at the Tokina 16-28mm f2.8 zoom which appears to be sharp but is much more money and considerably heavier. I need a wide lens for landscape work.


I use both lenses and they are sharp but do have distortion as do all lenses in this range.

Be careful how you align the scene and depending on what editor is used some of this distortion can be mitigated.
Go to
Dec 22, 2015 19:40:51   #
JD750 wrote:
Sone things to consider.

(1) if you shoot RAW format, (Nikon NEF format) you need to know that there are differences between RAW converters. I.e., differences between Adobe, Phase1, DXO, Rawtherapee, others, and also manuf software renderings. In theory the Nikon software would provide the highest fidelity converter for NEFs, yield the most accurate color, sharpness, and conversions, with the fewest artifacts. Canon the best for Canon RAW, Fuji for Fuji, etc. In practice the differences are subtle, you may not even see them, or you may find that you can see them and you prefer one RAW converter over the other. You should do your own comparisons. If you shoot JPEG format none of this will matter.

(2) Nikon software will provide post processing options for Nikon in-camera functions like picture control and in camera distortion correction, and Nikon camera white balance. In other words you can adjust these things after you shoot with RAW format, using the Nikon software. Note, You can do a custom white balance adj in aftermarket software too but you won't have the Nikon presets. This is a minor point but worth knowing. If you shoot JPEG format this will not matter.

(3) Camera manufacturers software can be clunky, slow, and and crash prone and Nikon software does nothing to change this trend.

(4) Nikon software is economical, the price is $0.00.

(5) Nikon does not make their living selling software, aftermarket companies do.

(6) Aftermarket programs can do a better job of cataloging and facilitating a "workflow". This can save time.

(7) Nikon software will only work for Nikon cameras. Aftermarket software works for multiple brands. Do you have phone cameras and would you like like to use your processing and cataloging software for them too?

All programs have learning curves. But if you shoot a lot of pictures an aftermarket program will ultimately save time. If you want the highest fidelity rendering for NEFs then you might want to suffer the manufs software, or at least use it for the initial rendering. So you may end up with more than one software in that workflow.

So it really depends on your end uses and preferences.
Sone things to consider. br br (1) if you shoot ... (show quote)


You covered it nicely.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 ... 1623 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.