cmc4214 wrote:
A few to start, I'll be back later
Picture #1 is intriguing to me. If those walls had eyes & ears what stories could they tell?
traderjohn wrote:
Given the suspected age in this group, in 10 years' time, a functioning anything will be a memory.
We need to think in generational terms. In previous post - it's not your artistic work that matters. It's your family that matters. Grandparents, going back as far as possible. In your family, there should there should be a member, make that a trustee, who is entrusted with the original (as far as is possible close to the original) - He / She should be skilled in processing out dust specs, scratches etc and then creating albums of archival grade prints as large as practical - given the quality of the original.
One more thing: Cloud storage - what are the odds that a given outfit is going to be in business in the next generation? Heck: back in the early days, I got sucked into that concept and then that outfit didn't go out of business they just pulled the plug. Think of cloud storage in short term. You are at the whim of those running the company. They could decide they don't want to play the cloud game any more - now what.
Final thought: yes, these albums should have copies - at different locations. I'll leave it up to y'all what that format is whether paper or some other medium. For those who hail from the film days. Hang on those negatives! The old B&W negatives that I have inherited from the family haven't deteriorated except for dust and from poor storage, scratches but there is software for that and I assume a generation from now that software will have improved.
Alan
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
That will be the issue, in 10+ years who will have a functioning BluRay or DVD drive?
This is a good point. I have a MFM format hard drive I would like to access for some WordPerfect files I stored way back in the DOS days. I can no longer access them because none of todays computers can read a MFM format HD.
Fast forward to +35 years. What kind of machine will read your CDs, BluRay etc drives.
At least get a pro-grade printer and print your important family pics (of grandparents etc) on 8 X 10 photo paper and store them in a controlled environment and tell your family that when whomever takes possession to do the same (Don't store them in the attic, basement or garage). Oh yes, be sure the ink you use won't degrade either.
Your artistic pics? Probably not as important as family pics.
Excellent work. Although I find the subject a bit disturbing but technically it's impressive.
Al
robertjerl wrote:
Nikon's dedicated action/wildlife/birds camera is the D500, just like my Canon 7DII. Go to the company site and see if they have any refurbished with factory warranty. The budget version would be the D7500, but it does not have the AF of the D500. If you would consider going Canon the 90D is "almost" a 7DII and they have them in stock at the Canon store-new and refurbished.
For birds with an interchangeable lens camera the real expense is going to be the lenses. Nikon's 200-500 is good, I use the Canon 100-400L with 1.4x at times or the Tamron 150-600 G2 - but it is big and heavy so I use it on a tripod-they make it for the Nikon and it will cost you a lot less than the 200-500 or my 100-400 cost me. A lighter, less expensive option is the Sigma C 150-600 but it isn't weather sealed and the Sigma Sport which is weather sealed is a lot more expensive.
Nikon's dedicated action/wildlife/birds camera is ... (
show quote)
While I can appreciate you budget limitation if you can mortgage your first born, the D500 was made for your application (along with fast action sports). It has a DX format sensor so glass would be relatively inexpensive
Life is short - go for it
Alan
hdfilmnoir wrote:
no ski trail but it would be fun to ski it
Thanks. I took my pics with a Sears Tower rangefinder w 2.8 lens. It took wonderful pics. It was my first camera.
Memories!
hdfilmnoir wrote:
San Antonio Mountain is a free-standing volcanic peak in Rio Arriba County, New Mexico. ... San Antonio Mountain, New Mexico, as seen from the Colorado side of the NM-CO state line on U.S. Route 285. Highest point. Elevation, 10,912 ft .
Help me out with the location. Back in the '60s I was traveling with a musical group and we took Rte 66 from the origins out to California. Did I come across this gorgeous place? How far off would I have had to go to get a shot of this mountain.
At the time - I was shooting Kodak Kodachrome ASA 10 and appreciated the bright sunlight
Subsequently, I switched over to Ektachrome - biiiggg mistake. The color shift in those slides over the decades were horrendous. However, When Ek ASA 170 came out those slides didn't fade nearly as much.
Just slightly larger than thumbnail size, no detail - don't know why I bother to type this reply except. By n large, we expect more than this. This is a working equivalent 3 x 5 print scan
Maybe it is - as there is no EXIF DATA
Must've been a nice place to visit with your Brownie - in some cases it's the memories that count, right?
Davethehiker wrote:
This long snowy spell has resulted in a lot of deer activity close to the house.
We have a flowering cherry tree just outside our guest bedroom window. Those trees make an umbrella shape as the branches extend toward the ground. We have two deer who like to hide under that tree and they like to eat the buds off the tree.
This is an un-cropped photo taken out the window.
This an amazing picture in every way. Resolution, detail, composition. I like that fact that you resisted the urge to post process.
Thanks for sharing, Alan
Boone wrote:
Funny, I mowed lawns for my .22. It was $23 back then when you could order a gun by mail.
$11.11 was a lot of money back then too. Thanks for the nice words!
Thanks,
Boone.
I remember those days. I bought my Marlin.22 bolt action via the mail. It arrived with no serial number. Amazing.
Unfortunately, I came from a divorced home (age 6), so I never got to see my Grammas either one. Thanks for sharing your wonderful memories. Hang onto that picture and store it in a place that's protected from light. You have the scanned image.
Fortunately, when my family passed one by one, I did inherit the picture albums so at least I can look at the pictures and wonder what it would have been like to visit my senior folks and learn and receive love from them
Bless you for sharing, Alan
Great picture nonetheless. Thanks for sharing.
CHG_CANON wrote:
Show us some 'bad' noise for an image above ISO-1000 from your EOS 90D. Make it an original image file in JPEG, being sure to store the attachment.
No, a firmware update will not change the noise characteristics that are a function of the sensor and the processor version.
It's *always* difficult to discuss specifically photographic results without post a full resolution photos (no PP please) so we can look at it and possibly come to some meaningful conclusions. Include EXIF information
Alan