Posts for: WILLARD98407
May 11, 2021 20:34:33 #
mwsilvers wrote:
If you have a graphics card with a GPU supported by DXO, the processing time can be as little as 6 or 7 seconds depending on how highend the card is and the size of the raw file.
apparently I don't possess a card with that speed.
May 11, 2021 18:19:44 #
Curmudgeon wrote:
Interesting set. Not being a DXO user can you tell me about "Deep Prime Mode" please
It has a HQ mode, a Prime mode and a Deep Prime mode.
Load an UNPROCESSED file, press Process Image 'button' and choose the mode with which you want to process.
Choose either DNG or JPEG as output file and a destination.
Push START.
Sit back for a minute or two and enjoy the result.
May 11, 2021 17:47:29 #
Results of Deep Prime mode----nothing was done to enhance the images other than to run the raw files through Pure Raw's Deep Prime mode and making jpeg copies.
I have a couple of older long lenses that are prone to magnificent levels of color fringing, and this took care of 90 - 95% (personal subjective) of it. Yayyyy.
I've done about 30 other images, both raw and jpeg. The results, even on a jpeg are quite good.
However, on some images, it seems the program can go too far and some "texture" (noise) is removed and some surfaces can look too smooth or over processed. Have to admit I have only tried the Deep mode. One of the others may be more to my liking for certain subjects. I'll see.
I'm really happy with it over-all and , although I still have 17 days left on my trial, I am going to purchase it and add it to my stable of DXO tools.
Hope this helps anyone else contemplating this program.
1. jpeg copy direct from raw file
2. Prime's first try at the raw file-----Hmmmmm.....
3. Prime's second try with raw file
4. Borrowed raw file, just for his example, for another perspective on Pure Raw results--jpeg copy direct from raw
file
5. Prime's result from raw file and jpeg copy
6. Jpeg copy directly from raw file of Otto car
7. Prime's result from raw file and jpeg copy - check the results in the shadows inside the car.
Results on the bif-- wow.
mrbill
I have a couple of older long lenses that are prone to magnificent levels of color fringing, and this took care of 90 - 95% (personal subjective) of it. Yayyyy.
I've done about 30 other images, both raw and jpeg. The results, even on a jpeg are quite good.
However, on some images, it seems the program can go too far and some "texture" (noise) is removed and some surfaces can look too smooth or over processed. Have to admit I have only tried the Deep mode. One of the others may be more to my liking for certain subjects. I'll see.
I'm really happy with it over-all and , although I still have 17 days left on my trial, I am going to purchase it and add it to my stable of DXO tools.
Hope this helps anyone else contemplating this program.
1. jpeg copy direct from raw file
2. Prime's first try at the raw file-----Hmmmmm.....
3. Prime's second try with raw file
4. Borrowed raw file, just for his example, for another perspective on Pure Raw results--jpeg copy direct from raw
file
5. Prime's result from raw file and jpeg copy
6. Jpeg copy directly from raw file of Otto car
7. Prime's result from raw file and jpeg copy - check the results in the shadows inside the car.
Results on the bif-- wow.
mrbill
May 3, 2021 19:09:08 #
camerapapi wrote:
Very nice portrait. The posing of the model is excellent.
In my case I prefer, specially for women a brighter background.
In my case I prefer, specially for women a brighter background.
me,too. but when it's dark out there, it's dark out there.
Apr 26, 2021 18:59:27 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Sure, luck means a lot in photography. Not being able to afford the best camera is bad luck.
How much will that one cost me?
Apr 26, 2021 18:49:40 #
kind of a Holy mess. I like the cross in the doorway.
Apr 23, 2021 12:09:22 #
Thank you all.
Off today to see our daughter and the grandsons after 58 weeks of separation from them.
Off today to see our daughter and the grandsons after 58 weeks of separation from them.
Apr 23, 2021 02:21:27 #
along comes another season of wandering Judy's gardens.
whipped this up for Ju for our anniversary.
whipped this up for Ju for our anniversary.
Mar 6, 2021 01:06:05 #
johngault007 wrote:
I have mastered the "IDGAF" stare if people are ever around me. It says I'm not approachable and I don't want to engage in small talk. The random and sometimes incorrect comments like the one you received above are something I haven't had to deal with, but the tourist "getting anything good?" question gets old. 
To that question I just answer, "Nope, but those folks over there might be". End of conversation.
Mar 5, 2021 23:43:56 #
Fredrick wrote:
Photoshop Elements 2021. It has three levels of use. Quick, Guided, and Expert. Very easy to initially use, and as your skills progress it can be a very powerful editor.
👍👍👍
Mar 2, 2021 19:11:59 #
Note from mrbill,...
I was given permission to post my fiddler, NOT to invite other posters to put up more pictures.
I blew it.
Please respect the original intent of Howard's thread by not putting up more pics.
My fault.
mrbill
I was given permission to post my fiddler, NOT to invite other posters to put up more pictures.
I blew it.
Please respect the original intent of Howard's thread by not putting up more pics.
My fault.
mrbill
Mar 2, 2021 11:58:03 #
Howard5252 wrote:
.
Nicely lit portrait, Howard.
.
With permission, my fiddler.
Any more out there?
Feb 26, 2021 02:16:40 #
Feb 25, 2021 22:31:24 #
Feb 25, 2021 22:16:29 #
