Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ole sarg
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 659 next>>
Nov 15, 2018 09:54:30   #
Fox News hopes he doesn't!


Architect1776 wrote:
Hope he does.
Go to
Nov 14, 2018 10:17:27   #
Trump has done nothing but fallen short of doing for vets and the military

FROM THE MILITARY TIMES

Pentagon & Congress
Trump's accomplishments on veterans issues fall short of administration boasts
By: Leo Shane III   August 23, 2017
2.5K

President Donald Trump signs the Veteran's Affairs Choice and Quality Employment Act of 2017 at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminister, N.J., on Aug. 12, 2017. Watching is Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin, left, and standing behind Trump are military veterans. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)
As the president prepares to address the American Legion’s annual convention, his policy successes don’t amount to the overwhelming victories claimed by his supporters.
WASHINGTON — When President Donald Trump addresses the American Legion national convention in Nevada on Wednesday, he’ll likely repeat the lengthy list of veterans accomplishments that he has chronicled at a host of events this summer.

But the list of clear-cut wins for this administration on Department of Veterans Affairs issues is considerably shorter than what the president has trumpeted.

Veterans issues are being touted both inside the White House and outside the administration as an area of significant successes for Trump. Earlier this month, Trump said his staff has done “record-setting business” at the VA in his first seven months in office, with more advances to come.

This White House can claim big changes on accountability rules at the VA, which make it easier to fire under-performing employees, and the Trump administration has also established a new hotline for veterans complaints.

However, other proclaimed advances on private-sector health care for veterans, medical records sharing with the Defense Department and new telehealth services within the VA amount to minimal changes in existing programs, not Trump-inspired innovations.

And in the case of the recent GI Bill changes — praised by the veterans community as a major benefits expansion for tens of thousands of veterans — Trump’s only real contribution was signing into law a deal that was reached by lawmakers on Capitol Hill.


Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
We are making tremendous progress with the V. A. There has never been so much done so quickly, and we have just started. We love our VETS!

75.4K
7:15 AM - Apr 28, 2017
Twitter Ads info and privacy
27.4K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The biggest part of what Trump has labeled “our many legislative successes” on veterans issues has been action from the Republican-controlled House and Senate. Issues like benefit appeals reform and accountability were discussed in recent years, but never finalized for then-President Barack Obama to sign into law.

Here are some of the successes Trump is likely to discuss during his American Legion appearance Wednesday, and the background on what has actually changed on each issue:

Accountability
The biggest change Trump has brought so far to the VA is new accountability rules, making it easier to fire workers within the department.

At a veterans event earlier this month, Trump said the changes “have been in the making for 40 years” but that previous administrations “weren’t able to get it approved.”

Republicans on Capitol Hill have pursued the idea for the last three years with limited success, passing a measure that was supposed to make dismissing senior executives at the VA a quicker, less cumbersome process. After two years, that measure was abandoned due legal concerns about its constitutionality.

But the new legislation signed into law in June replaced that with an expedited firing process for misbehaving employees, a mechanism for stripping those workers of ill-gotten bonuses, and new protections for whistleblowers.

Union groups and Democratic critics have questioned the wider value of the program, saying that simply firing workers more quickly won’t improve overall service at the VA. But department Secretary David Shulkin has repeatedly said keeping under-performing workers on the payroll hurts both morale and public opinion of the bureaucracy

Trump officials have also established a new Office of Accountability and Whistleblower Protection within the VA to better root out problem workers.

Since Trump took office, more than 700 workers have been fired from department posts, most before the new rules were put in place. VA has more than 350,000 workers across the country.

VA Choice
Trump has signed into law two bills on the controversial VA Choice program in recent months, both times stating that the moves will give more veterans a chance to seek private-sector health care at the government’s expense.

“Why can’t they go out and see a doctor?” Trump asked at a Choice bill signing earlier this month. “If they have to wait seven days or 14 days in line, why can’t they see a doctor, and we’ll pay for the cost of the doctor? That’s going to be a lot less expensive, but, more importantly, you’re going to have immediate medical care for our veterans.”

“That’s what we’re doing.”

But neither of the bills Trump signed on the Choice program created new rules for veterans’ outside care options. Rather, the measures extended and stabilized existing programs, allowing select veterans to continue using existing services.

The Choice program — one in a series of VA community care offerings that pre-date the Trump administration — pays for medical visits of veterans to private-sector physicians if those patients face a 30-day wait or a 40-mile travel to VA facilities.

About one-third of all VA-funded medical appointments happened outside department clinics and hospitals before Trump took office. That number could rise significantly in years to come if other Trump-promised changes become law, but so far those proposals are still under debate.

Veterans medical records
Similarly, Trump has touted plans to create “seamless care between the Departments of Defense and Veteran Affairs” as a new initiative for his administration. Yet that same idea was one of the high-profile goals outlined by Obama in 2009 (and by VA secretaries before his presidency).

In June, Shulkin announced plans to shift veterans’ electronic medical records to the same system used by the Defense Department, potentially bridging a long-problematic gap in continuous medical care for troops as they separate from the military and start seeking care at the VA.

While the announcement alone was significant — DoD and VA have fought for years over the most appropriate system for shared medical records — any actual results of the new plan are still years away. Implementation plans won’t be finalized until the end of 2017.

He has similarly touted a new VA website showing wait-times data for all department facilities as a game-changer for t***sparency in government. The site allows veterans to see the average appointment delays at every hospital and clinic nationwide.

VA officials unveiled the site in April, but said that work on the effort began during the previous administration.

White House hotline
One of Trump’s signature campaign promises was to set up “a private White House hotline, which will be active 24 hours a day answered by a real person” for veterans to voice their complaints about VA personnel and operations.

That hotline — available at 855-948-2311 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. EDT — launched in June. It’s expected to expand to 24-hour coverage this fall, after more veterans are hired to staff the operation.

Yet the hotline is largely disconnected from the White House. VA officials are funding, staffing and setting procedures for the call center. White House officials are deferring all questions on the hotline to the VA.

VA officials said the hotline receives about 1,200 calls a week, and that follow-ups are promised to anyone calling with specific concerns or difficulties if callers provide their personal information.

GI Bill expansion
When Trump signed the “Forever GI Bill” legislation into law earlier this month, he did so with little fanfare despite significant excitement among the veterans community at the legislation.

The measure removes the expiration date for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. It expands eligibility for reservists and Purple Heart recipients. It offers new protections for students whose schools experience financial problems during their studies. And the new law offers more tuition money for science and technology degree programs.

It represents the culmination of years of work by lawmakers on Capitol Hill, much of which was done without much input from the White House.

Republican and Democratic lawmakers huddled with veterans groups over how to pay for the $3 billion expansion and which changes to include, with negotiations breaking down and restarting multiple times in the last three years.

In the end, groups involved with the work praised Congress for the success and quietly expressed disappointment that the president didn’t better highlight the victory.

VA staffing
Another of Trump’s campaign promises for the VA was to appoint a new secretary “whose sole purpose will be to serve veterans.” Shulkin was confirmed 100-0 by the Senate, a sign of bipartisan support.

But Trump’s broader promise of stocking federal departments with qualified leaders remains largely unfilled.

Nominees for the permanent heads of the VA’s benefits and health care systems were expected before the start of the summer, but no nominees have been selected yet. The undersecretary for memorial affairs post is also currently manned by an acting official, awaiting a permanent replacement.

Leaders on Capitol Hill have criticized the slow pace of nominees from the White House, saying it compromises Trump’s ability to affect systemic changes by leaving career bureaucrats in place within federal departments.

But VA officials have pushed back against those criticisms, saying that reforms are being put in place by Shulkin, himself a holdover from the Obama administration.

Benefits appeals reform
Appeals reform was a major goal of not just Shulkin but his predecessor, former VA Secretary Bob McDonald. The plan passed by Congress this year was almost identical to ones presented to lawmakers last year which stalled out for political reasons.

Trump is expected to sign a major overhaul to the veterans benefits appeals process during the American Legion appearance Wednesday, fitting given the group’s significant work on the issue in recent years.

Along with fellow veterans organizations, the Legion helped craft a new appeals process which will speed up the time needed to process appeals by setting limits on how some supplementary information can be submitted. The hope is a significant drop in the average wait time for those cases, which now tops five years.




hj wrote:
Don't be a partisan i***t posting a ridiculous picture of President Trump suggesting he ignores veterans. President Trump has done more for the military in two years than Obama did in eight!!!

Trump
Go to
Nov 14, 2018 10:10:18   #
Was Obama first to miss Memorial Day at Arlington?
Story
Comments (2)
ShareShare
Print
Create a hardcopy of this page
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size


Ariana Diaz
Ariana Diaz
Posted: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 9:36 am

Ariana Diaz Sun Staff Writer | 2 comments

Every year Americans celebrate Memorial Day and Veterans Day to honor our nation’s service members, both past and present, for their service to our country.

On Memorial Day it is tradition for the president of the United States to visit Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia, deliver a speech and lay a wreath at the Tomb of Unknowns.

However, I say “tradition” lightly because although it is a custom, it is not required for the president to do so. The president can send someone else in his place.

According to the Arlington National Cemetery’s website, “the president or his designee lays a wreath to mark the national observance of Veterans Day, Memorial Day or some other special occasion.”

Prior to our recent observance of Memorial Day, I was seeing rumors all over the Internet that President Barack Obama was not going to attend the services at Arlington, and would thus be the first U.S. president who did not lay a wreath on Memorial Day.

Obama did in fact lay a wreath and deliver his Memorial Day speech at Arlington this year, but just for fun let’s set the record straight.

According to several p**********l libraries, university databases and the National Archives, several 20th-century presidents — including Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon — never visited the Arlington site on Memorial Day. What a shocker?!

Herbert Hoover went in 1929, but a sitting U.S. president did not visit Arlington on Memorial Day again until Gerald R. Ford attended the ceremony in 1975.

Ronald Reagan went three times out of his eight years in office, while Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush never went.

This isn’t to say these presidents didn’t do anything to honor the occasion, because they did, but I’m specifically referring to the ceremony at Arlington.

In fact, it seems according to records, the tradition of presidents going to Arlington on Memorial Day didn’t really begin until Bill Clinton was in office.

In 1993, after receiving flak about his lack of military service, Clinton visited Arlington on Memorial Day and continued to go for the next seven years.

Then there’s George W. Bush. Bush did go seven of his eight years in office, but let me also point out that would also mean there was one time he didn’t.

That year George W. Bush spoke at a cemetery in Normandy, where Americans k**led during the D-Day invasion and in World War II are buried. Former Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz laid the wreath in his place.

In 2009, months after Obama took office, he went and laid a wreath.

Here’s where the controversy starts. On Memorial Day 2010, Obama did not go to Arlington. Instead, he was scheduled to deliver a speech to honor fallen soldiers at Abraham Lincoln National Cemetery in Illinois, while Vice President Joe Biden took his place at Arlington. When a thunderstorm in Illinois interrupted Obama’s scheduled event, he returned to Washington to deliver his speech at Andrews Air Force Base instead.

The critics were in a frenzy. President Obama just can’t win, even if the critics are ignorant of the facts about the tradition.

With the exception of 2010, Obama has participated in the wreath-laying ceremony at the Tomb of Unknowns every year, including this year.

It might also be worth mentioning for anyone who questions Obama’s loyalty to the troops, that Obama has met privately with the families of the fallen.

In the fall of 2009, he also made a special midnight visit to Dover Air Force Base in Delaware to witness the return of fallen G.I.’s.

Now, the information I have provided may not mean much to Obama’s critics, but I definitely think it’s worth mentioning. He has enough problems at the moment without people making things up about him on the Internet.
http://www.southeastsun.com/opinion/ariana_diaz/article_58ea72b4-cded-11e2-b946-001a4bcf6878.html
Go to
Nov 14, 2018 10:04:22   #
the President does not fund or defund anything. Congress does!

Take a civics course


Elaine2025 wrote:
obummer never had any respect for the military and defunded it to the point it was useless.
Go to
Nov 13, 2018 10:07:21   #
Members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars place a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on Veteran's Day at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., November 11, 2018. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts (© Reuters)

Trump, Pence miss Veterans Day observance at Arlington Cemetery

The White House announced a travel lid at 10 a.m. ET, meaning the president was not expected to hold any public events or leave the executive mansion.
Fox News on MSN.com · 17h

As a veteran I cannot hold our two top elected leaders in anything but contempt! The president respects no one and Pence's words ring of holy hollowness!
Go to
Nov 13, 2018 09:12:21   #
Hell now that the e******n is over I wonder what happened to the existential immigrant problem!

Harvey wrote:
Just wondering what suddenly silenced this loud mouthed jerk - he was all over the "Trump" stuff then all of a sudden nothing - did the "Trump" tell him to shut up or what.
Go to
Nov 13, 2018 09:05:42   #
As a vet who uses the VA they were better under OBama!

Your experience?


Blurryeyed wrote:
LOL… Sure wish do nothing Obama was back in office, things were great for the Vets back then in the good ol' days.
Go to
Nov 13, 2018 08:46:44   #
For the same reason democrats aren't burning down North Dakota!
Go to
Nov 12, 2018 09:16:08   #
Here, here

There are great quotes regarding Memorial Day here is one from Patton:

“It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God such men lived” — George S. Patton

Here is one from Trump

I ain't going to no cemetary when its raining! Donald Trump


kd7eir wrote:
One day after snubbing Marines because of a little rain, trump will meet with Putin on Veteran's Day, of all days.

People need to stop giving this draft-dodging grifter the benefit of the doubt and call him EXACTLY what he is: T*****R
Go to
Nov 11, 2018 09:46:45   #
That kinda depends on how close you want to get to a lion!

Yaya wrote:
I have a Nikon D7500 and need suggestions for a good lens to use on safari. I was thinking of the Nikon 18-200 mm with VR II. I already have the Nikon 70-300 lens but figured the 18-200mm would be a better all purpose travel lens. Or do you think I’d do better to get the 18-300mm. Also, does anyone know the difference between VR and VRII? Anyone with safari experience I would really appreciate your input. I’ll only get to make this trip once so I need to get it right. Thanks for any suggestions.
I have a Nikon D7500 and need suggestions for a go... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 10, 2018 10:14:12   #
Do inform us!


Architect1776 wrote:
Please do not make this political.
You know absolutely nothing about the LDS church from your comments here. You go to f**e news sources and spew garbage that is incorrect and I do not have the time to correct you and your prejudices. You are completely wrong is the short answer.
So just move on and let those who can comprehend what this says enjoy the saying.
Thank you.
Go to
Nov 10, 2018 10:13:33   #
I'll bet you took your mortgage deduction and deductions for the children you raised (another form of welfare) Of course those funds given to you by the government are just fine. The money given to the government by poor and wealthy alike made up the above funding. Then again there is the funding of roads, the military, food safety, drug safety, medical care, scientific research, etc all funded by the government are fine because they benefit you. So just what are you prepared to give up and just how much are you prepared to donate for allowing to live in a civil society?

I am curious just what means of production the government manages and dictates as to what is produced. Do inform me.


Largobob wrote:
I'm sorry Architect1776, if I stepped on a nerve. I was born and raised in Palmyra, New York....the birthplace of Joseph Smith and the Mormon religion. Each summer, we opened our home to Mormon families, who came to participate in the Mormon Pageant, at Hill Cumorah, where Angel Moroni presented the golden plates to Joseph Smith. Thousands of Mormons from around the world descend on this small town each year with no violence or need to hire additional security. I have great respect for the LDS church and it's members. I think my experiences are far beyond those of f**e news sources...and I have lived it first hand.

Don't make this political? Socialism is a political disease!

My comment was directed at the socialistic attitude of "let the government take from the rich to give to the poor." In most cases, the poor are poor for a reason. I believe in charity and am personally very generous. I just have a problem with someone else taking my money without my direction.
I'm sorry Architect1776, if I stepped on a nerve. ... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 10, 2018 10:01:44   #
The vast majority do not think Social Security is inept! On what do you base this statement? Give us some facts! Underfunded yes, but that is just the will of the Congress not the result of the program. Tax everyone at the same rate regardless of income. Medicare for all is possible and probably desirable if we want to pay for it. Hell we could cut some of this nonsense defense budget and pay for most of it. We could tax the wealthiest 1% at the rate most pay and cover most of it. As for doctors and the rest of the medical profession they do not seem to be going broke treating medicare patients and many prefer medicare patients because they don't have to fight with insurance companies! Costs could go down because more would pay than use. You know like the way the insurance industry makes its money!

You are a sycophant for the the takers but not a giver! You show yourself as a mean spirited person.


SteveR wrote:
In her mind, Medicare for all would be affordable because it would be cheaper. Think about it. Doctors would be paid less. Hospitals would be paid less. Nurses and all healthcare professionals would be paid less. Healthcare would be cheaper because, well, it would be a watered down version of the healthcare system that we have now. The smartest individuals that we have would not be motivated to go into medicine....how could they ever pay for medical school, for one thing!! Major operations for seniors? Lotsa luck. Queue up.

You think Social Security is inept. Wait until the government takes over your healthcare.
In her mind, Medicare for all would be affordable ... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 10, 2018 09:50:52   #
If a president acts to obstruct the law which he is bound to enforce than s/he is committing a high crime. Notice that there is no definition of high crime in legal statutes. It seems that in fact the definition of high crime is defined by the Congress when it comes to the president.

dirtpusher wrote:
An says nothing about him obstructing
Go to
Nov 10, 2018 09:24:41   #
You mean the movie Space Balls wasn't a documentary!

f8lee wrote:
All this nonsense about UFOs is fun to think about, but really is meaningless. There is little doubt that life exists elsewhere in the universe - after all, the universe is a damned big place with more planets than your puny human minds can imagine!And 'twould seem life can be created from nothing without the need to invoke a guy in a robe upstairs - the right bunch of chemicals and maybe a bit of electrical zapping and voila!

That said, the odds of some intelligent life from another planet has visited here are vanishingly small - again, your puny human minds are virtually incapable of imagining the sheer distances involved. And warp drive and wormhole ridiculosity aside, there just ain't no way to go that far in any meaningful period of time. To traverse space for hundreds or thousands of years would imply the intrepid adventurous astronauts would have to be aboard a ship that holds a large number of them such that they could reproduce. So, yeah, maybe the moon is in actuality a spaceship filled with aliens who observe from above wile fooling us hairless monkeys that it's just a big dead rock up there.
Um, no.
All this nonsense about UFOs is fun to think about... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 659 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.