Posts for: catchlight..
Jul 18, 2019 08:22:56 #
al13 wrote:
I personally think the raw is better and could be even more so with a little post work.
Amazing answer...
The RAW image is a preview of what the Jpeg will look like after you process it into a Jpeg. RAW is only information.
Jpeg is an image completed and possessed from RAW either by the camera or software you use to edit.
Jul 18, 2019 07:49:33 #
DirtFarmer wrote:
I think it is unlikely that the raw converter will... (show quote)
... It's like trying to take the chocolate chips out of baked cookies vs not putting them into the dough.
Jul 18, 2019 07:37:25 #
Not true...
Raw will actually differ from the "preview" camera generated Jpeg when in Photoshop or lightroom. Its easy to see the difference loading each.
Important things like sharpness and contrast have not been possessed into the RAW image because it is not output, its the input information.
That's another reason Jpeg is a poor choice for editing... taking away sharpness or other qualities the camera produced as an output Jpeg is counter productive.
mwsilvers wrote:
That's odd. They shouldn't.
They should. When the RAW converter applies exactly the same settings as the camera they are the same. Now you can modify the RAW files a lot better than the JPEG but initially when I open the RAW files they look exactly the same as the JPEG counterpart. If I simply save them as JPEG I have the exact same things. But if I don't like it I can make adjustments.
Raw will actually differ from the "preview" camera generated Jpeg when in Photoshop or lightroom. Its easy to see the difference loading each.
Important things like sharpness and contrast have not been possessed into the RAW image because it is not output, its the input information.
That's another reason Jpeg is a poor choice for editing... taking away sharpness or other qualities the camera produced as an output Jpeg is counter productive.
mwsilvers wrote:
That's odd. They shouldn't.
They should. When the RAW converter applies exactly the same settings as the camera they are the same. Now you can modify the RAW files a lot better than the JPEG but initially when I open the RAW files they look exactly the same as the JPEG counterpart. If I simply save them as JPEG I have the exact same things. But if I don't like it I can make adjustments.
Jul 18, 2019 07:21:05 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
If you're going to post an unprocessed RAW image and ask us to compare it to anything, you've demonstrated you:
1) don't know what you're doing
2) don't know why you're doing it
3) don't know what you should be doing regarding RAW
For the people who choose to edit your image for you, you're just wasting their time. What are they going to do, buy you their software and edit all your images going forward?
1) don't know what you're doing
2) don't know why you're doing it
3) don't know what you should be doing regarding RAW
For the people who choose to edit your image for you, you're just wasting their time. What are they going to do, buy you their software and edit all your images going forward?
Perfect reply in a sea of muddy water!
... and why are over saturated examples being offered that add nothing to answer the question?
Jpeg is the product of editing RAW data. It is like comparing a negative to a photo.
Jul 15, 2019 15:09:30 #
This is why the Hog is so entertaining...
Pool games played with mandatory helmets makes sense to some, right? ...
Perhaps someday in a parallel universe, visiting a state that does not recognize the mandated UV filter law could lead to hefty fines... or worse yet... extended jail time
In reality... I fell with a polarize filter attached last fall. The distorted aluminum metal filter destroyed the lens thread mount, and the shards severely scratched the coating, destroying the lens. Without a filter I think my chances would have been better.
Pool games played with mandatory helmets makes sense to some, right? ...
Perhaps someday in a parallel universe, visiting a state that does not recognize the mandated UV filter law could lead to hefty fines... or worse yet... extended jail time
In reality... I fell with a polarize filter attached last fall. The distorted aluminum metal filter destroyed the lens thread mount, and the shards severely scratched the coating, destroying the lens. Without a filter I think my chances would have been better.
Jul 15, 2019 08:31:10 #
jerryc41 wrote:
I'm waiting for B+W to perfect their bulletproof series of filters. I've had so many lenses damaged by gun shots that I've lost count. 
LOL ...
Jul 15, 2019 05:50:34 #
I thought everyone agreed that two UV filters (in case the first shatters when dropped... or the lens is hit by a stray bullet) was the consensus at the end of the last 75 page discussion?
Jul 15, 2019 05:44:39 #
I have to agree with those who say megapixels are not all that important. I think dynamic range, speed or DOF play a bigger roll.
I did a shoot with a newly acquired 1DX Mkii at 20 mp last week and actually prefer the look of the color and dynamic range over the MK4's 36 mp, even when cropping.
The print world has a place for maximum mega pixels no doubt. It will be interesting to see where the mega pixel war takes the industry in the future.
I did a shoot with a newly acquired 1DX Mkii at 20 mp last week and actually prefer the look of the color and dynamic range over the MK4's 36 mp, even when cropping.
The print world has a place for maximum mega pixels no doubt. It will be interesting to see where the mega pixel war takes the industry in the future.
Jul 13, 2019 09:00:48 #
First use of Canon my 1DX MKii this past week end.
Interesting in the first shot that the Mustang emblem is readable behind the cone. The look and color of the blurred back round has an appealing look, that is much different than the 5D MK4's I am used to using.
It seems the MK4 will capture more detail in the deep blur, but the 1DX MKii has cleaner color, with superior contrast. Both cameras fit specific needs for me, but I am impressed with the accuracy and near perfect image that comes with the 1DX MKii.
Having no buffer to worry about takes time to absorb and if you are used to the crash at about image 13 with the MK 4, the 1DX MKii is such an amazing experience.
Shot at the National Mustang/ Shelby Speed Week in Elverum, Norway
Interesting in the first shot that the Mustang emblem is readable behind the cone. The look and color of the blurred back round has an appealing look, that is much different than the 5D MK4's I am used to using.
It seems the MK4 will capture more detail in the deep blur, but the 1DX MKii has cleaner color, with superior contrast. Both cameras fit specific needs for me, but I am impressed with the accuracy and near perfect image that comes with the 1DX MKii.
Having no buffer to worry about takes time to absorb and if you are used to the crash at about image 13 with the MK 4, the 1DX MKii is such an amazing experience.
Shot at the National Mustang/ Shelby Speed Week in Elverum, Norway
Jul 3, 2019 10:25:31 #
Halden, Norway, Great place to live
Jul 3, 2019 10:13:47 #
You are dead on with your comments, and with much of the same thoughts in mind, i last week opted for a 1DX mkii purchase.
If Canon's 1DX mkii is surpassed by a mirrorless version any time soon I will be surprised, and if it happens the price will most likely be double.
If Canon's 1DX mkii is surpassed by a mirrorless version any time soon I will be surprised, and if it happens the price will most likely be double.
Jul 2, 2019 09:09:02 #
Someone is not a mechanic because they bought a box of tools. There are good mechanics with bad tools, and bad mechanic's with the finest in hardware... attitude and a cell phone can be surprising.
The outcome makes you the photographer, not the act of photographing...
The outcome makes you the photographer, not the act of photographing...
Jun 30, 2019 08:06:57 #
Doughnut Derelict's Cars and Coffee, early sat morning 6am to noon. Celebrities show up on occasion and the cars are fantastic to see. 
Jun 27, 2019 08:35:31 #
As an inspirational story, this is exactly the mindset necessary. On the other hand making a consistent 2K and now 10K per month is not easy.
There are few who dare criticize or offer contradicting advise to anything printed on the Hog, and trolls certainly enjoy the game this site offers. I would like to add I am not a troll, and hope my comments add a bit of balance.
I hope your information is factual, but I see little other than a few small examples. Graphic-media artists generally use a portfolio and have a more structured method to distribute. Adding a link would add more credibility for sure.
The level of knowledge can require 4 years of college. Adobe's vast amount of editing platforms to create sell-able art, can take years to master. The caliber of art commanding an income at the level you describe is possible, but reasonable equipment, editing software and a genuine graphic arts career education would be the best recommendation.
The camera really doesn't matter and a Rebel can produce good images, sure... but think I would most likely hire you as a journalist rather than a photographer, based on your story telling abilities ...
There are few who dare criticize or offer contradicting advise to anything printed on the Hog, and trolls certainly enjoy the game this site offers. I would like to add I am not a troll, and hope my comments add a bit of balance.
I hope your information is factual, but I see little other than a few small examples. Graphic-media artists generally use a portfolio and have a more structured method to distribute. Adding a link would add more credibility for sure.
The level of knowledge can require 4 years of college. Adobe's vast amount of editing platforms to create sell-able art, can take years to master. The caliber of art commanding an income at the level you describe is possible, but reasonable equipment, editing software and a genuine graphic arts career education would be the best recommendation.
The camera really doesn't matter and a Rebel can produce good images, sure... but think I would most likely hire you as a journalist rather than a photographer, based on your story telling abilities ...
Jun 27, 2019 04:16:00 #
Interesting is the fact that, as mirrorless bodies shrink in size, complaints increase on ergonomics.
I have the Fuji x100F as a walk around camera, and love that it is so convenient and portable. One basic shortcoming is no thumb rest... its odd how the manufactures can't figure that out. Most mirrorless need extra's like hand grips, or other add-on's to be more usable it seems.
With two Mk 4's that serve me well, a Canon 1DX mkii purchase was a tough one, considering what is in print concerning the specs of the 5D vs 1DX and the size. None the less, I love the bulkiness... and my Lord is it accurate and fast. One of the best purchases I have ever made. I really had to toss the idea of going smaller on this one.
Yes, small can be a good thing, but for me, when I need to mount serious glass or be more accurate... Bigger seems a better choice, and the size of the 1DX mkii actually has an ergonomic advantage after a week of use, when comparing bodies.
I wonder when a perfect ergonomic size, and basic hand comfort will be finally figured out in the designs of future bodies...
I have the Fuji x100F as a walk around camera, and love that it is so convenient and portable. One basic shortcoming is no thumb rest... its odd how the manufactures can't figure that out. Most mirrorless need extra's like hand grips, or other add-on's to be more usable it seems.
With two Mk 4's that serve me well, a Canon 1DX mkii purchase was a tough one, considering what is in print concerning the specs of the 5D vs 1DX and the size. None the less, I love the bulkiness... and my Lord is it accurate and fast. One of the best purchases I have ever made. I really had to toss the idea of going smaller on this one.
Yes, small can be a good thing, but for me, when I need to mount serious glass or be more accurate... Bigger seems a better choice, and the size of the 1DX mkii actually has an ergonomic advantage after a week of use, when comparing bodies.
I wonder when a perfect ergonomic size, and basic hand comfort will be finally figured out in the designs of future bodies...