Sorry I didn't you anything yet, I forgot I had golf league.
I looked up your scope and it is pretty slick. If you haven't upgraded already, I would suggest that you also get an autoguider and upgrading your focuser to have a coarse/fine adjustment.
Disregard that right ascension drive, I had another mount in mind.
IR Jim wrote:
If you shoot at ISO3200 you won't need 30 seconds to get an image, the background will have a lot of color noise.
I have taken pictures of the Orion Nebula from a tripod at ISO3200+ however it was with a D7000. I'll post them for you when I get home along with the exposure times. Hopefully it will give you an idea of what to expect.
Dutchman01 wrote:
I recently bought a 3200. Having a Celestron 8in. Schmidt-Cassagrain and everything but an equatorial wedge, I naturally would love to jump into astrophotography. Would the 30 second maximum exposure of the 3200 be enough that I could stack them in Registax and come up with good results? If I can master guiding the scope and seeing that it is polar aligned correctly it seems that with practice I could get a few decent looking photos. I'm not planning to try for the faint fuzzies right off the bat, but if I could get some brighter objects like the Pleides or the Orion Nebula I would be satisfied. I don't think there is any mirror lock up feature either. Would the old trick of holding black cardboard in front of the tube and allowing time for the vibrations to cease possibly cure the problem? Hopefully some experienced person out there has some answers.
I recently bought a 3200. Having a Celestron 8in. ... (
show quote)
I think the camera will do great. If you shoot at ISO3200 you won't need 30 seconds to get an image, the background will have a lot of color noise.
Best thing to get is an equatorial mount with a right ascension drive.
Attached is a picture I took with a D3100. 30 second exposure, ISO200. Taken through a 120mm refractor.
Orion Nebula
Harry Thomas wrote:
If you are familiar with "Smart Photo Editor" do you know if there is a comprehensive manual could you point me in the right direction. Thanks in advance.
Here you go!
http://www.smartphotoeditor.com/downloads/SmartPhotoEditor.pdf
I dint think it's an NTSC / PAL issue. It may be the video format the files were recorded in. I think the default is AVCHD but you may need to convert it to MPEG-4 to get them to play on an iPad and perhaps your TV also.
What type of TV do you have?
What cable are you using to connect?
EricLPT wrote:
Nice looking Rhodies and interesting clouds on that sunset.
My crazy schedule is keeping me from photography but I did capture a few images on a hike to Lost Cove last month. Lost Cove was a small settlement that was accessed by trail, rail or river only, no roads. It was a haven for Moonshiners but when rail service ceased the town dried up. There are a few buildings, a cemetery, and various small village artifacts but local yahoo's have burned several of the buildings, there's graffiti and it was a huge disappointment, at least the 12 mile hike in/out was pretty...
Eric
Nice looking Rhodies and interesting clouds on tha... (
show quote)
Wow Eric, Pic #1 is simply awesome. :thumbup:
Hunakai wrote:
Does any UHH have experience with a camera sling that does not use the 1/4-20 tripod mount and can recommend one? It looks like I'm down to the FlashFire, or the Optech
What a good question that has brought on many good opinions. I had bought (I think an off brand) rapid strap that connected to the camera strap eyelets. I found that it was annoying that the straps would cover the screen and cover my thumb while poised for shooting. I started to unclip one side but I still found that annoying. I eventually put that strap on my IR camera and bought a CarrySpeed FS-Pro that utilizes the tripod socket. The mounting plate underneath has 6 1/4-20 sockets and I keep my tripod quick release plate installed. I haven't had any problems with the design and it holds my D7000 with 300mm zoom just fine while climbing trees, mountains, walls, etc.
I did see comments that claimed that the tripod socket was not designed to hold the camera via strap. I was concerned that I may damage my camera so I contacted Nikon and this was their reply.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Communication History
Response David D. via Email 04/30/2014 10:32 AM
HI
Thanks for the question. We have tested these sort of straps and found that they can safely be used with our products. We do caution that you don't drop the camera when finished shooting, rather, lower it gently until the strap is supporting the weight. Thanks
-David
Customer James via Web 04/30/2014 07:23 AM
Does Nikon support the use of camera straps that utilize the tripod socket for connection to the camera?
Does the ISO 1222 spec specify this?
Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A7uFSbRJ5w#t=80
BrentHarder wrote:
I was told that the star on the far right is actually Mars. Can anyone verify that?
Beautiful shots!
You are correct, that was Mars by the Moon last night.
Last nights total lunar eclipse.
Lunar eclipse phases
The phases of last nights total lunar eclipse.
The other dark side of the Moon
raysass wrote:
Post some pics.if you get any.Good luck. Ray.
Will do. I have some but my hands are too numb to handle my SD card. :lol:
I'm using 300m on a 1.5 crop sensor. About to hook my camera up to my telescope.
raysass wrote:
I won't be seeing it here for sure. Raining and clouded over. :hunf:
That's a bummer. I'm lucky tonight; many times I have cloud cover during celestial events.
The penumbral phase of tonight's total lunar eclipse. Not like you can see much eclipse, it's just dimmed at this point.
Penumbral