Architect1776 wrote:
Have camera makers lost vision of actually making photos?
It seems that like the nuclear arms race of the cold war, cameras have generally become overkill to the taking of photos.
Yes, some advances are welcome, especially in the realm of AF and fps. But overall does a camera need to be so complex, needing over 1,500 pages of instructions in some cases, to use them?
Or are all the bells and whistles truly needed and used?
Just wondering for a friend.
Recently I had the use of 3 different rental cars . . . as my car was in the body shop for repairs due to an accident that was not my fault. It became painfully obvious to me that all of these particular rental cars used mostly symbols instead of simple words on the switching to indicate their use. I had these 3 cars for only a few days each and I spent quite a bit of time reading the car manual trying to remember what these meaningless symbols meant. Why not use simple words on each control switch such as on, off, up, down, etc., etc. Wouldn't it be better to make things more "user friendly". I would also like to see more "user friendly" applied to camera controls. You get the idea I hope.