Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dsmeltz
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 630 next>>
Apr 22, 2021 09:05:43   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
It was Apple that torpedoed the OP's copy of LR5, not Adobe.




Torpedo Research is the largest cost center of the Apple R&D effort! They love to do proprietary stuff that snuffs innovations not their own.

It is why I am a PC and Android guy.
Go to
Apr 22, 2021 09:02:17   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Google: what is dam


Yeah! Or go to a site with experienced photographers and ask....

Ohhh. That is what they did....

My bad...

Or yours.
Go to
Apr 22, 2021 09:01:05   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
It's so easy to go along, be part of the crowd, to subscribe ...


Right... subscribe, follow the crowd, buy a mirrorless camera...etc...



Just pulling your chain.
Go to
Apr 22, 2021 08:57:19   #
Pytrouble wrote:
Hello Hoggers:
I work on a Mac and had been using Lightroom 5 for years, first for cataloging and organizing as well as editing. For the last couple of years I've been using it mainly as a DAM while using Luminar 4 for editing. I recently upgraded my OS to Catalina which disabled some of the functions on my old version of LR. I have uninstalled LR and figured I'd use Luminar 4 as my cataloging program. It leaves a lot to be desired in that respect. So, I'm looking for an alternative. I do not want to go to the subscription for Adobe creative cloud as I have never used and don't wish to learn Photoshop and you can't get LR alone. I've been doing some internet research and have looked at Capture One (rather expensive) and ON1 Photo Raw (a little more reasonable). Both of these also have editing capabilites - not necessary for me but a nice bonus. Reading about various programs on the internet is one thing but hearing real photographers experience with these programs is better. The ability to use keywords is important to me. Any advice and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Hello Hoggers: br I work on a Mac and had been usi... (show quote)


Photoshop Elements catalogs, I believe. Do not know if it will import your LR5 catalogs. Anyone?
Go to
Apr 22, 2021 08:49:39   #
jackm1943 wrote:
Any prints I get in the future are going to be on metal or plastic, no framing necessary.


Frameless stretched canvas is also nice!
Go to
Apr 22, 2021 06:57:43   #
anotherview wrote:
Rent one.


The 600mm (the 12,000 lens in the OP's example [the 400mm 5.6 is not that much while the 2.8 is])) rents for $400.00 for 7 days. In 30 weeks you will have paid $12,000 and then have to send it back. If you are a pro, a rental is deductible, if not, the rental is lost money.
Go to
Apr 22, 2021 06:36:48   #
Cueman wrote:
Hands up those who think they will have $12,000 left after a divorce....?


Buy the lens BEFORE the divorce! That way you can get in the settlement costing as used!
Go to
Apr 22, 2021 06:34:58   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Well, since the OP’s question was specifically about long lenses I think we can surmise that they’re interested in long lenses.


Actually his question was about an [b[expensive[/b] lens. It happened to be long.
Go to
Apr 21, 2021 09:47:31   #
frankraney wrote:
Larry, the op also says he is in HEAVY underbrush and in that case, No bracket will work. That's why several of us mentioned raising the iso. If he is crawling through heavy brush, higher iso is the only option.

Not trying to argue with you, but just do not see how anything but higher iso would work on this case.


The OP also said "Jungle flash TTL photography" as in a flash one CAN use in the jungle. That is sort of the whole point of the post.
Go to
Apr 21, 2021 09:45:39   #
larryepage wrote:
As semiconductor devices, sensors would be expected to either work or not. They don't "wear out" in the traditional sense, although it is possible that sensor elements (or groups of them) could stop working. They could either fail dark or fail "hot."

It is also possible that some sort of film might have formed on the sensor or on the metering elements, causing the meter to think more light is needed than really necessary.

All that said, you mentioned that your grandson was "playing" with the camera a year ago. I'd go through and make sure nothing is set amiss in the camera.
As semiconductor devices, sensors would be expecte... (show quote)


Has anyone here ever tried to clean a sensor on a P&S? Do not know if that is the issue, but it if someone asked a similar question about a DSLR, cleaning the sensor would be in the mix of suggestions.
To be honest, there are so many inexpensive and massively better P&S cameras out there for a 9YO. I would just junk the A550 and put out $50 for something better. A used underwater GoPro or Olympus Tough might be nice.
Go to
Apr 21, 2021 09:30:12   #
joer wrote:
If you shoot DSLR the Canon 400 5.6 is what you want. New its around $1100...you can find it used for less. This prime lens out resolves all the zoom lenses in this class.


The OP "may" want that, but it really depends on what kind of photography they shoot. The 400 5.6 is a nice (as in AWESOME!) lens. Not for macro, event or portrait photography, but wildlife heck yeah. Unfortunately, we do not know much about the OP's wants and needs.
Go to
Apr 21, 2021 09:24:19   #
LFingar wrote:
Epson printers are hard to beat. I have two and both produce beautiful prints, are trouble free, and have no ink problems even though one often sits for months between uses. My XP-960 prints up to 11x17. The current version is the XP-970 priced at $299.99 on the Epson site.


Epson has been racking up a lot of very positive press. I always wanted a Canon photo printer, but have been putting it off for retirement. Now, I would seriously consider Epson.
Note: I currently use an Epson ET-4550 EcoTank for general printing and have been very happy with it.
While the OP's target is $300 for purchase, I would remind them that the cost of printing is ink, not the machine. Look at the cost per page and price of ink generally.
The Epson EcoTank ET-7750 is double the cost target, but uses the refillable and cost effective EcoTank system with five colors. (And it prints to A3 size!) Over time it will be less expensive unless you do not print much. But if you do not print much, a printing service is probably better to start with.
When I do retire, I will look for one of these on sale.
Go to
Apr 21, 2021 08:22:27   #
blackwc2 wrote:
Hi, I am new to the site.
I was just wondering how you all afford the price of lenses?
Would really like 400, or 600 mm
Lenses but $12,000.00.......
How?


Canon makes a lot of equipment for the pro sports photographer market.
The first rule of sports photography is:
"If you have to ask the price, choose another profession."
A starter setup for a pro sports shooter would come in somewhere around $30-40K
$10-15K in camera bodies, a similar amount or more in lenses, and then there are the monopods, computer equipment, protective gear, etc....
Go to
Apr 21, 2021 07:01:44   #
Winslowe wrote:
It would be interesting to see this demonstrated in a jungle.


It looks very collapsible and transportable. I would think it could work in a jungle.
Go to
Apr 21, 2021 07:00:25   #
imagemeister wrote:
Google is your friend ......but here is my story. ( NOT much on the internet after now looking ! - only us old timers know about this stuff 8-(

Back in the day, when I was young and foolish and doing weddings/portraits, I used the Larson Soff shoulder bracket/reflector system quite extensively/successfully. At the time, it was being promoted by the glamour photographer Peter Gowland (now deceased) who had a flair for designing photographic tools/equipment for his glamour niche.

The Soff shoulder was manufactured by Larson Enterprises also known for their "Refectasol" line of umbrella fabrics/systems. As stock, the Soff Shoulder (SS) came with a 15 inch foldable square reflector that was suspended by a 20 inch arm attached to the camera body. The beauty of this arm was that you could swing it in an arc around the camera thereby changing the lighting angle in both landscape and portrait camera orientations ! You could use it with the fabric reflector or as a direct flash/light. Using the reflector you lost 3 stops of light - the reflector fabric was called "super silver". It could leave diamond shaped catch lights in the eyes .....

There are a couple similar systems today if you look hard but none have the arm that can swing in an arc AFAIK. I have adapted mine to accept the current efficient LED continuous light sources available. If you want one you have to look on ebay. AFAIK.

Gee, I HOPE this is "useful" .........you're welcome
.
Google is your friend ......but here is my story.... (show quote)


Cool
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 630 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.