I'm not a fan of handcuffs on naked women. I'll bet if you asked 3 or 4 guys to write a story about what the photo tells us about the human condition, I probably wouldn't like the stories either.
I wouldn't call them vulgar, but a bit clinical instead. I would prefer the first one to have some skin smoothing rather than the grainy look, but that's just me,
What ever we say, keep on working, you are the artist and you must first please yourself.
PaolaPF
Loc: Roma via Tommaso da celano,94 00179
Bunko.T wrote:
And along with breasts, are what sends men crazy.
Funny how we never see penis's in nude photography. All for men & by men, but no men???
Come on girls, how about some equality??
obviously a penis is only a penis too
it is the same for male or female.
unfortunatelly I haven't a penis to show you (maybe in my next life) In this forum there are lots of men. and I am sure that one of them will demostrate that a penis is just a penis (like a finger , an ear, an eye)
and not a bad thing to show and a dirty part of our body suitabile only for porn site
if nobody want no problem ask me and my hubby will be happy to show you his penis,
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
If I recall correctly we have seen a penis in this section and it was not well received. So in answering your question, please have your husband keep his pants on. Thanks.
foathog wrote:
I'm NO prude. I didn't condemn it, I simply questioned if it was something meant for this category. Otherwise, bring on the intercourse and sex toys. LOL
And the donkeys and the dog!!!
PaolaPF
Loc: Roma via Tommaso da celano,94 00179
JohnFrim wrote:
If I recall correctly we have seen a penis in this section and it was not well received. So in answering your question, please have your husband keep his pants on. Thanks.
yes of course ah ah ah
perhaps the non-positive judgments depended on the ......subject...... not on the technical qualities of the photo
Gabby has some very clean muscle and bone structure, which is not always the case. Well coiffed lady parts.
PaolaPF wrote:
yes of course ah ah ah
perhaps the non-positive judgments depended on the ......subject...... not on the technical qualities of the photo
Or perhaps it is on the technical qualities of the photos but all you want is positive comments.
I shoot a lot of nudes and fetish, including ads for prostitutes. I don't think the two photos in question are "vulgar", I just find them unappealing.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
dat2ra wrote:
I shoot a lot of nudes and fetish, including ads for prostitutes. I don't think the two photos in question are "vulgar", I just find them unappealing.
Well, considering your statement of what you shoot, along with the fact that you have only posted one image to this section (which I thought was tasteful), can I compliment you as a photographer with integrity?
[quote=travelwp]I'm not a fan of handcuffs on naked women.../quote]
Many photographers and naked women prefer rope or leather or other 'soft' restraints to cold steel. Some like both and some prefer metal.
JohnFrim, I don't know. That decision is solely yours to make.
Although the first image does not appeal to me, I do think this is the proper place to display it and to have this discussion. As to Bonko's comment about why no penis in photography, I refer him to gay men's magazines: there are plenty of peni there. And women photographers don't shot much penis bsadly because they are just not as captivated by looking at penis as we males wish they were.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.