The linux applications to which you refer are all open source, meaning they are free to anyone regardless of operating system. The question is whether they are available for a particular user's OS (I am certain you know this, just pointing it out to clarify for others). There is a version of each of the applications you mentioned available for Windows. Gimp and RT also run on MAC, I'm not certain about DT.
I use both Windows and Linux, subscribe to Adobe, but have untold respect for these open source programs and those who work tirelessly to develop and maintain them. It pleases me that you (and others) point out these fine programs. As others have pointed out, software is a personal choice, but the logic behind the notion that because Adobe is the "industry" standard, one should just go with "the best" escapes me.
LR and PS are slick applications, but there are features in DT and G that I prefer. Furthermore, the latest version of Gimp eliminates the bit-depth limit which for so long was the weakness to which most of its critics so frequently pointed in comparing it negatively to PS.
DT can do things that LR simply cannot (robust masking that allows for localized edits to the image before converting/exporting to tif or jpg is but one example).
The learning curve for these applications is no more (and, of course, no less) difficult than that for LR/PS, and, as the OP stated that he prefers to stay away from Adobe's subscription plan, I cannot imagine a reason why he should not try these fine applications before shelling out $60 or so for some other JR Adobe or other application. What is to lose by trying one of the open source programs. It's akin to stating that, in choosing a camera/camera system, you should stick to Canon/Nikon because they are "industry standards."
My Linux version of Gimp is packaged with darktable, and when you choose to open a RAW file with Gimp, the application calls darktable to open the RAW file which you can then proceed to open in Gimp (similar to Adobe's LR/PS or Bridge/PS routine).
Everything one needs is, for the most part, available in that DT/Gimp package, it is free, there are regular updates to both programs which are also free. For someone leery of subscription plans, what could possibly be better?
My 2 cents.
Merry Christmas
Caruso
G Brown wrote:
Search for Free post processing programmes. Look at the software that came with your camera CD and also what is available from their website for free.(they do not always ship it on the CD)
I use linux so use lots of freeware some like Gimp are free on windows, See if Digikam, Raw therapee and Darktable are free for your Operating system. These are great!
BUT everyone has their own favourites and there are a lot of free and cheaper options now that photography has sky rocketed in use.
Most larger programs have a bit of a learning curve....whereas the smaller ones use similar terminology but you get to use and explore all of them quickly (less drop down menu's) so as a beginner try the simpler versions for a short time (remember they are simple!) and at some point you will know 'what else' you need to do to your images.
As an aside......whilst checking out PP look at composition too.....This makes the biggest difference to your images.....just saying :-)
have fun
Search for Free post processing programmes. Look a... (
show quote)