Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Just sayin'
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
Dec 23, 2018 14:11:22   #
nadelewitz Loc: Ithaca NY
 
Bill_de wrote:
There is a flip side to all this. I know a number of people who put so much effort into saving money that they don't realize they could earn twice what they save with half the effort. All they would need to do is retune their thought process.

--


If you earn money from your photography it's a different story. A pro with a real business can weigh benefits vs. expense, deduct equipment costs from income taxes. Whatever he/she thinks is "needed" is a business expense. Fine. My original issue is with the GREAT majority of us who do it for personal enjoyment with limited funds.

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 14:14:27   #
wham121736 Loc: Long Island, New York
 
Expensive gear allows the photographer to capture images not possible in difficult circumstances. Shutter speeds in the thousandths of a second, ISO numbers also in the thousands, for example. But if you look at images from the early 1900s and even before, you will realize that under "normal" conditions current images are no better, IMHO.

quote=nadelewitz]Is it not possible that "good" photography, whatever that means, can still be done without having a fortune to spend?

$500.00 tripods, $160.00 L-brackets, editing software that you have to pay for, the "top" Nikon cameras, Canon "L" lenses, $150.00 filters....on and on.....

Seems like ANY question asked about what to use/buy quickly turns into endless suggestions to spend tons of money, and that you are foolish if you don't. Those who have it think that everyone does.

Give us ordinary non-professionals a break, please.[/quote]

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 14:37:06   #
latebloomer Loc: Topeka, KS
 
nadelewitz wrote:
Is it not possible that "good" photography, whatever that means, can still be done without having a fortune to spend?

$500.00 tripods, $160.00 L-brackets, editing software that you have to pay for, the "top" Nikon cameras, Canon "L" lenses, $150.00 filters....on and on.....

Seems like ANY question asked about what to use/buy quickly turns into endless suggestions to spend tons of money, and that you are foolish if you don't. Those who have it think that everyone does.

Give us ordinary non-professionals a break, please.
Is it not possible that "good" photograp... (show quote)


With equipment, it depends on what you want to do and will the equipment do that. If you want a lens that is water resistant, takes very sharp pictures, and can handle tough handling, you may need a more expensive lens than cheaper models. Is build quality important?
I have found that I don't need the most rugged lens available. Also, some of my plastic body lenses work very well. It does depend on how you use them. I have no regret about buying a $600 tripod recommended by Gene51. It may not be a Gitzo; yet, it works just as well and it will last a lifetime.

It is the artist making the photograph that counts. On the other hand, if one is doing very specialized work, the equipment is critical.

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2018 14:53:18   #
axiesdad Loc: Monticello, Indiana
 
Bronco, I'm curious, what are the bells and whistles that made it worthwhile, to you, to upgrade from the 3400? I've been using a 3100 for several years now and can't think of an instance where the camera wasn't able to do what I wanted. The same has not always ben true of the operator. :)
broncomaniac wrote:
My current gear is upper entry level and I love it. I've never considered upgrading from what I have now and I probably never will. I'm really happy with what I have and I've suggested similar or like gear to those who equal my budgetary constraints. I don't need a full frame for my hobby (and that's all it is) so I'll never buy one and nobody here has ever suggested that I should.

I DO tend to steer people away from entry level because they are so easy to outgrow once the light comes on and you surpass the learning curve. I've owned entry level (Nikon D3400, Canon T6i) and quickly resold the equipment to get where I am. I have just the right amount of bells and whistles to suit me.

I don't know enough about modern point and shoot camera capabilities and features to suggest one to anyone starting out so I don't.

Once a member provides a budgetary figure I add my two cents, and they are based on my personal experience where growth is concerned. Nothing more.
My current gear is upper entry level and I love it... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 15:02:56   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
nadelewitz wrote:
If you earn money from your photography it's a different story. A pro with a real business can weigh benefits vs. expense, deduct equipment costs from income taxes. Whatever he/she thinks is "needed" is a business expense. Fine. My original issue is with the GREAT majority of us who do it for personal enjoyment with limited funds.


I haven't earned a dime from photography in over 45 years. I used to get some nice jobs, but decided I liked it better as a hobby. I worked and played hard and retired at 55. I buy what I want and can afford. Then I give away what I don't need anymore. So for anyone who thinks I shouldn't have 'this year's model', there is somebody out there shooting with 'last year's model' and is happy to have it. Of course I don't get new gear every year, but you get the point.

---

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 15:46:11   #
ncfilly22
 
Me too!

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 16:06:02   #
wetreed
 
mgoldfield wrote:
From my reading here and on various Facebook groups devoted to photography, there is enormous pride of ownership in expensive lenses and full frame cameras. How many really need a Canon 5dMk4 and $15,000 worth of lenses along with tripods filters, etc.?

It's all quite absurd.


I disagree. I don’t think I will ever have a full frame camera, but that does not make people who have full frame cameras absurd. It just means they have different priorities than I have. I think some people should stop being so very judgmental. If you don’t like the subject matter of a thread, don’t read it, but don’t criticize other people for being interested in it. That is all I have to say about that.

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2018 16:24:43   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
wetreed wrote:
I disagree. I don’t think I will ever have a full frame camera, but that does not make people who have full frame cameras absurd. It just means they have different priorities than I have. I think some people should stop being so very judgmental. If you don’t like the subject matter of a thread, don’t read it, but don’t criticize other people for being interested in it. That is all I have to say about that.


Yeah!

That's what I was going to tell my wife. But then I woke up.

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 16:41:24   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
I'm another non-pro who owns pretty good stuff. It's mine, I paid cash for it, and I didn't miss any meals due to the expenditure (although I could probably well afford to miss some meals, particularly in the winter time). I have fun with it and that's about it.
I have a friend who bought a boat. He paid more for it than the sum total of all my gear. He uses it for fishing. He occasionally catches fish and eats them. That's about it.
The expense isn't the important thing.

I believe it's possible to take great photos with moderate gear. It does take some skill on the part of the camera operator. I seriously doubt whether I will ever possess that skill.
I believe it's possible to improve my photography with capable gear. The capability of the gear offsets some of my lack of skill. (Unfortunately that is currently limited to the technical details of the photo and does not yet extend to composition or color balance).

In computer matters, the term "PEBCAK" is often used (Problem Exists Between Chair And Keyboard). A similar term might be used for photographic matters. Maybe something like "PEBEASR" (Problem Exists Between Eye And Shutter Release). (I just thought this up, so someone could undoubtedly improve on the phrasing).

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 17:03:22   #
wetreed
 
DaveO wrote:
Yeah!

That's what I was going to tell my wife. But then I woke up.


Wives very often just do not understand and can very often be a problem. What town are you in ? I grew up in Connecticut.

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 17:11:59   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
If someone can afford the gear, the money was honest and the bills are paid then ... outside the family unit ... the buyer owes no expanation.

I have a ton of luxury goods and buy nearly all of it LN but used ... and ‘getting a deal’ makes it easier to justify.

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2018 17:27:18   #
Stan Fayer
 
I had a friend that in the film days shot with a Marinda camera with home made extenders made from toilet paper spools and tape. He had a diamond star from the Photographic Society of America. It’s the eye, and the idea , not the wallet.
Stan

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 17:33:31   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
wetreed wrote:
Wives very often just do not understand and can very often be a problem. What town are you in ? I grew up in Connecticut.


No problem...she shakes her head and rolls her eyes!

I am north of Norwich up in Windham County in Plainfield. Nice and rural and referred to as the quiet corner of the state. The bad news is there are no real camera store closer than Warwick, RI. Perhaps that is a good thing!

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 17:53:16   #
N4646W
 
nadelewitz wrote:
Is it not possible that "good" photography, whatever that means, can still be done without having a fortune to spend?

$500.00 tripods, $160.00 L-brackets, editing software that you have to pay for, the "top" Nikon cameras, Canon "L" lenses, $150.00 filters....on and on.....

Seems like ANY question asked about what to use/buy quickly turns into endless suggestions to spend tons of money, and that you are foolish if you don't. Those who have it think that everyone does.

Give us ordinary non-professionals a break, please.
Is it not possible that "good" photograp... (show quote)


Right on!! Could not have said it better.

Ron

Reply
Dec 23, 2018 18:42:12   #
polskasila
 
Yes I have to agree! It's like all that expensive equipment will make them great photographers.
I also would say most people buy a camera and never fully comprehend what that camera can do.
Rather than learn by using the camera they are too busy reading articles for a better whatever!
Like any other activity there are those who actually want to buy the peripheral equipment and stare
at it like a treasure and expound on what it will do for them. Get out and take the pictures. Learn
all you can about the camera with practical experience. You will master different steps as you go along.

My very best to you,
Jim K.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.