Does anyone have any SX40............ (Page 5): This thread is for the Canon SX40..... PLEASE refrain from trying to HiJack this thread just because you don't like this camera. Start...

Wahawk Loc: NE IA

bvargas wrote:

It is my understanding that the Lumix FX200 has a CONSTANT f2.8 at all zoom positions. Example: 600mm @f.2.8. If this is true, it is unheard of on any other camera to date. Maybe, I read the specs wrong, but again, if it's true, WOW, and of course, it is very expensive compared to other cameras of this class.

This thread is for the Canon SX40.....
PLEASE refrain from trying to HiJack this thread just because you don't like this camera.
Start your own thread if you want to talk about the Lumix!!

WxGuesser Loc: Portland OR

Wahawk wrote:

Carioca wrote:

Wahawk wrote:

Would be nice if the next version includes the capabilities of the CHDK to allow RAW, remote release, additional ISO and speed capabilities, etc.

Nice, and expensive.

CHDK is free to ANYONE! The capabilities are there, the programming has been done, all Canon has to do is include it and with NO OTHER CHANGES, they can add value without changing the cost. It would NOT be expensive to do.

Unfortunately I can't figure out the instructions to get it to start recording in RAW. I need a dear dummy step one step two step three instruction manual.

Jackinthebox Loc: travel the world

Wahawk wrote:

quote=bvargas It is my understanding that the Lum... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

bvargas Loc: Palm Harbor, Florida

Don't take it personal. I did not say, I did not like the Canon, I have one. Just made a suggestion on the Lumix that is coming out this month. I thought you would like to be educated on what's new. But I guess I was wrong.

Carioca

Wahawk wrote:

Carioca wrote:

Wahawk wrote:

Would be nice if the next version includes the capabilities of the CHDK to allow RAW, remote release, additional ISO and speed capabilities, etc.

Nice, and expensive.

CHDK is free to ANYONE! The capabilities are there, the programming has been done, all Canon has to do is include it and with NO OTHER CHANGES, they can add value without changing the cost. It would NOT be expensive to do.

They would have to customize it to the specs of the new camera before they could release it, and do all the testing and documentation that goes along with software changes. Plus the time involved would delay getting the cams out to market, which delays that money coming in.

I'd love to see that happen, but realistically, I think it's too much to expect.

Carioca

WxGuesser wrote:

Unfortunately I can't figure out the instructions to get it to start recording in RAW. I need a dear dummy step one step two step three instruction manual.

The Quick Start Guide is here. Skip to the section headed "RAW Parameters".

Nubia

hj wrote:

Here's a good review if you haven't already seen it:
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_PowerShot_SX40_HS/

Terrific article hj. Thanks!!! I had the SX30 which I lost by dropping it in ocean water, ouch!!. I loved that camera and carried it almost everywhere I did not need my DSLR and also with it.

This article helps a lot, and adds doubt.. I have been looking at Panasonic cameras features and the raw capabilities is an important factor along with other features, but the SX40 offers the improvement of noise at higher ISO. A tough choice. I'll check Panasonic's coming models.

Thanks again

hj Loc: Florida

Wahawk wrote:

quote=bvargas It is my understanding that the Lum... (show quote)

I think your comment is inappropriate. When discussing cameras, folks frequently make observations about competing cameras other than the one first mentioned. Read any review, in any source, whether it is about autos or whatever and your will find comparisons made. How else does one learn about options?

DJ Mills Loc: Idaho

For those who want to simply weigh in on their SX40 experiences, see my thread, "How Many SX40 Users Are There?"
DJM

donrent Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl

WxGuesser wrote:

quote=prestonphoto quote=Wahawk quote=prestonph... (show quote)

donrent Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl

WxGuesser wrote:

quote=prestonphoto quote=Wahawk quote=prestonph... (show quote)

donrent Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl

Go to Manualsink.com... You can get probably ANY manual you want and get it in an 8"x11" size.... About 20 bucks and worth every penny...

Wahawk Loc: NE IA

hj wrote:

I think your comment is inappropriate. When discussing cameras, folks frequently make observations about competing cameras other than the one first mentioned. Read any review, in any source, whether it is about autos or whatever and your will find comparisons made. How else does one learn about options?

If you READ the title to this thread and the OP's original post, this thread was asking specifically for SX40 pictures and comments!!
Any other topic is "off subject".

WxGuesser Loc: Portland OR

donrent wrote:

Go to Manualsink.com... You can get probably ANY manual you want and get it in an 8"x11" size.... About 20 bucks and worth every penny...

They don't have one for the SX40 because of the word "copy" embedded in the PDF. But that is where I got a very nice printed copy for my SX30, cut to the page size the PDF file is formatted for, and spiral bound.

I do second your recommendation for those PDF manuals that haven't been 'sabotaged.' They are a lot cheaper in terms of time and effort and faster than doing it yourself.

hj Loc: Florida

Wahawk wrote:

quote=hj I think your comment is inappropriate. ... (show quote)

Off subject....according to you? Seems like you're the only one that has a problem with helpful info being shared. Guess perhaps you're the forum police? Just lighten up, please. "Comments" include how an item under discussion stacks up with other cameras.