Macro lens choice
Dec 21, 2018 21:20:21 #
augieg27 wrote:
Thank you all for the response.
I'm now using extension tubes for macro.
How much more quality can I get with a dedicated lens?
I'm now using extension tubes for macro.
How much more quality can I get with a dedicated lens?
Can you describe how much "Quality" you are getting with the tubes plus lens you are using at present?
I ask because what you consider as 'quality' others may not and it may be referring to something totally different that what I'm thinking. As an example, I recently read a post where someone described 'quality' as what most would describe as 'DOF'.
Dec 21, 2018 23:25:30 #
I just got the refurbushed Nikon 105 f2.8 vr from their website this week and used it on a commercial job Thursday. The build quality and optical quality is evident. I’m spotting dust, errant manufacturing flaws, zooming in beyond viewing size to catch and ckean-up the little stuff. The longer lens leaves you some distance to work, room to place lights and flags, and gently compresses perspective, more to my taste.
Dec 21, 2018 23:25:30 #
I just got the refurbushed Nikon 105 f2.8 vr from their website this week and used it on a commercial job Thursday. The build quality and optical quality is evident. I’m spotting dust, errant manufacturing flaws, zooming in beyond viewing size to catch and ckean-up the little stuff. The longer lens leaves you some distance to work, room to place lights and flags, and gently compresses perspective, more to my taste.
Dec 22, 2018 06:03:30 #
Dec 22, 2018 06:05:36 #
martinfisherphoto wrote:
I see you've been asking about macro lens since july 2017.. Get any 100mm macro lens and start learning. It's Not about the Lens, it's about the properly diffused flash and technique. You have to practice, practice, and practice. Post some of your work in the Macro section here on the Hogg and the macro folk can help you from there.......
Dec 22, 2018 06:23:49 #
augieg27 wrote:
I'am considering Tamron SF 90.mm 2.8 vs. Nikon 105mm 2.8mm (used)
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
I have the Nikon micro nikkor 105 mm and a Tamron 180 mm. Both produce outstanding, sharp images. The 180 mm gives max image size at greater focus distance, which I prefer for shooting skittish critters. You'd be happy with either, I think. Enjoy! …. and take architect's advice -- it's the only way to find Carnegie Hall... :-)
Dec 22, 2018 06:28:55 #
augieg27 wrote:
I'am considering Tamron SF 90.mm 2.8 vs. Nikon 105mm 2.8mm (used)
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
I don't know about the Tamrom but I do have the Nikon 105 f/2.8' I have used it for a couple of years and found it to be one of the sharpest lens around. I would highly recommend this lens.
Dec 22, 2018 06:29:58 #
augieg27 wrote:
I'am considering Tamron SF 90.mm 2.8 vs. Nikon 105mm 2.8mm (used)
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
I have an early version of that lens I think it is the best lens in my bag. It is a bit long-ish on an APS-C sensor camera, but the flat field 1:1 macro with plenty of working distance is great. It is FABULOUS for portraits, too.
Dec 22, 2018 07:12:13 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
augieg27 wrote:
I'am considering Tamron SF 90.mm 2.8 vs. Nikon 105mm 2.8mm (used)
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
The Nikon 105 2.8 has been the standard that all others are compared to. Go with the standard, you will not be disappointed.
Dec 22, 2018 07:18:20 #
Dec 22, 2018 07:30:33 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
DAN Phillips wrote:
Why put Ford hubcaps on a Cadillac? Go with the Nikon!
Dec 22, 2018 07:30:48 #
augieg27 wrote:
I'am considering Tamron SF 90.mm 2.8 vs. Nikon 105mm 2.8mm (used)
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
What would you be your advice?
Should I consider others?
Thank you.
I went with the Tamron 90 2.8 (F017 model - SP 2nd gen) based on reviews...love this lens (very sharp, great contrast) ...although when I get some GAS money may try:
* Nikon 60mm f/2 D lens (great used deals from Japan on ebay)
* Tokina 100mm f/2.8
Dec 22, 2018 07:52:42 #
I do this type of thing several times a day: one thing vs another.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Tamron+SF+90.mm+2.8+vs.+Nikon+105mm+2.8mm&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS716US717&oq=Tamron+SF+90.mm+2.8+vs.+Nikon+105mm+2.8mm&aqs=chrome..69i57.567j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
https://www.google.com/search?q=Tamron+SF+90.mm+2.8+vs.+Nikon+105mm+2.8mm&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS716US717&oq=Tamron+SF+90.mm+2.8+vs.+Nikon+105mm+2.8mm&aqs=chrome..69i57.567j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Dec 22, 2018 08:02:01 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
That "thumbs-up" From a man of few words, a man like that should be listened to.....Though , HE'S A MAN OF FEW WORDS< Notice that HE really is a man of Many LETTERS & NUMBERS!!! kmgw9v
Dec 22, 2018 08:13:34 #
digit-up wrote:
That "thumbs-up" From a man of few words, a man like that should be listened to.....Though , HE'S A MAN OF FEW WORDS< Notice that HE really is a man of Many LETTERS & NUMBERS!!! kmgw9v
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.